Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Conversion therapy is a treatment strategy that shifts from palliative systemic therapy to curative surgical treatment for primary and/or metastatic stage IV gastric cancer (GC).To address its clinical statements, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association aims to present a consensus on conversion therapy among experts attending KINGCA WEEK 2024. The KINGCA Scientific Committee and Development Working Group for Korean Practice Guidelines prepared preformulated topics and 9 clinical statements for conversion therapy.The Delphi method was applied to a panel of 17 experts for consensus and opinions. The final comments were announced after the statement presentation and discussed during the consensus meeting session of KINGCA WEEK 2024. Most experts agreed that conversion herapy provides a survival benefit for selected patients who respond to systemic therapy and undergo R0 resection (88.3%). Patients with limited metastases were considered good candidates (94.2%). The optimal timing was based on the response to systemic therapy (70.6%). The regimen was recommended to be individualized (100%) and the duration to be at least 6 months (88.3%). A minimally invasive approach (82.3%) and D2 lymph node dissection (82.4%) were considered for surgery. However, resection for metastases with a complete clinical response after systemic therapy was not advocated (41.2%). All experts agreed on the need for large-scale randomized-controlled trials for further evidence (100%).Recent advancements in treatment may facilitate radical surgery for patients with stage IV GC. Further evidence is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Conversion therapy is a treatment strategy that shifts from palliative systemic therapy to curative surgical treatment for primary and/or metastatic stage IV gastric cancer (GC).To address its clinical statements, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association aims to present a consensus on conversion therapy among experts attending KINGCA WEEK 2024. The KINGCA Scientific Committee and Development Working Group for Korean Practice Guidelines prepared preformulated topics and 9 clinical statements for conversion therapy.The Delphi method was applied to a panel of 17 experts for consensus and opinions. The final comments were announced after the statement presentation and discussed during the consensus meeting session of KINGCA WEEK 2024. Most experts agreed that conversion herapy provides a survival benefit for selected patients who respond to systemic therapy and undergo R0 resection (88.3%). Patients with limited metastases were considered good candidates (94.2%). The optimal timing was based on the response to systemic therapy (70.6%). The regimen was recommended to be individualized (100%) and the duration to be at least 6 months (88.3%). A minimally invasive approach (82.3%) and D2 lymph node dissection (82.4%) were considered for surgery. However, resection for metastases with a complete clinical response after systemic therapy was not advocated (41.2%). All experts agreed on the need for large-scale randomized-controlled trials for further evidence (100%).Recent advancements in treatment may facilitate radical surgery for patients with stage IV GC. Further evidence is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Conversion therapy is a treatment strategy that shifts from palliative systemic therapy to curative surgical treatment for primary and/or metastatic stage IV gastric cancer (GC).To address its clinical statements, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association aims to present a consensus on conversion therapy among experts attending KINGCA WEEK 2024. The KINGCA Scientific Committee and Development Working Group for Korean Practice Guidelines prepared preformulated topics and 9 clinical statements for conversion therapy.The Delphi method was applied to a panel of 17 experts for consensus and opinions. The final comments were announced after the statement presentation and discussed during the consensus meeting session of KINGCA WEEK 2024. Most experts agreed that conversion herapy provides a survival benefit for selected patients who respond to systemic therapy and undergo R0 resection (88.3%). Patients with limited metastases were considered good candidates (94.2%). The optimal timing was based on the response to systemic therapy (70.6%). The regimen was recommended to be individualized (100%) and the duration to be at least 6 months (88.3%). A minimally invasive approach (82.3%) and D2 lymph node dissection (82.4%) were considered for surgery. However, resection for metastases with a complete clinical response after systemic therapy was not advocated (41.2%). All experts agreed on the need for large-scale randomized-controlled trials for further evidence (100%).Recent advancements in treatment may facilitate radical surgery for patients with stage IV GC. Further evidence is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate public perception of medical specialties in South Korea that diagnose and treat different sleep disorders. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey between January and February 2022, as part of the National Sleep Survey of South Korea 2022. A questionnaire was administered to a stratified, multistage sample of 4,000 random individuals aged 20–69 years from the general population. Participants were asked to select all sleep disorders they believed required treatment from a list. Subsequently, they were asked to identify the clinical department they would visit for each disorder. Results: Sleep apnea (83.4%) and snoring (82.4%) were widely perceived as sleep disorders requiring treatment, followed by insomnia (76.1%), sleepwalking (72.0%), narcolepsy (52.4%), bruxism (49.6%), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (43.4%), excessive daytime sleepiness (33.4%), restless legs syndrome (30.1%), and sleep talking (18.5%). Regarding departments, otorhinolaryngology was the preferred specialty for snoring (79.7%) and sleep apnea (49.4%). More than half of the respondents (55.2%) indicated that they would consult psychiatry department, followed by neurology department (28.2%) for insomnia. Neurology department is preferred for restless legs syndrome, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, excessive daytime sleepiness, and narcolepsy. “Unsure” was a common response for more than 10% of the disorders, excluding snoring and insomnia, highlighting the gaps in public awareness regarding sleep disorders. Conclusions Public perceptions of the appropriate medical specialties for different sleep disorders vary and are often inconsistent with medical guidelines. Public education regarding the roles of different specialties in managing sleep disorders may improve care by guiding patients to the appropriate specialties.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate public perception of medical specialties in South Korea that diagnose and treat different sleep disorders. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey between January and February 2022, as part of the National Sleep Survey of South Korea 2022. A questionnaire was administered to a stratified, multistage sample of 4,000 random individuals aged 20–69 years from the general population. Participants were asked to select all sleep disorders they believed required treatment from a list. Subsequently, they were asked to identify the clinical department they would visit for each disorder. Results: Sleep apnea (83.4%) and snoring (82.4%) were widely perceived as sleep disorders requiring treatment, followed by insomnia (76.1%), sleepwalking (72.0%), narcolepsy (52.4%), bruxism (49.6%), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (43.4%), excessive daytime sleepiness (33.4%), restless legs syndrome (30.1%), and sleep talking (18.5%). Regarding departments, otorhinolaryngology was the preferred specialty for snoring (79.7%) and sleep apnea (49.4%). More than half of the respondents (55.2%) indicated that they would consult psychiatry department, followed by neurology department (28.2%) for insomnia. Neurology department is preferred for restless legs syndrome, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, excessive daytime sleepiness, and narcolepsy. “Unsure” was a common response for more than 10% of the disorders, excluding snoring and insomnia, highlighting the gaps in public awareness regarding sleep disorders. Conclusions Public perceptions of the appropriate medical specialties for different sleep disorders vary and are often inconsistent with medical guidelines. Public education regarding the roles of different specialties in managing sleep disorders may improve care by guiding patients to the appropriate specialties.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate public perception of medical specialties in South Korea that diagnose and treat different sleep disorders. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey between January and February 2022, as part of the National Sleep Survey of South Korea 2022. A questionnaire was administered to a stratified, multistage sample of 4,000 random individuals aged 20–69 years from the general population. Participants were asked to select all sleep disorders they believed required treatment from a list. Subsequently, they were asked to identify the clinical department they would visit for each disorder. Results: Sleep apnea (83.4%) and snoring (82.4%) were widely perceived as sleep disorders requiring treatment, followed by insomnia (76.1%), sleepwalking (72.0%), narcolepsy (52.4%), bruxism (49.6%), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (43.4%), excessive daytime sleepiness (33.4%), restless legs syndrome (30.1%), and sleep talking (18.5%). Regarding departments, otorhinolaryngology was the preferred specialty for snoring (79.7%) and sleep apnea (49.4%). More than half of the respondents (55.2%) indicated that they would consult psychiatry department, followed by neurology department (28.2%) for insomnia. Neurology department is preferred for restless legs syndrome, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, excessive daytime sleepiness, and narcolepsy. “Unsure” was a common response for more than 10% of the disorders, excluding snoring and insomnia, highlighting the gaps in public awareness regarding sleep disorders. Conclusions Public perceptions of the appropriate medical specialties for different sleep disorders vary and are often inconsistent with medical guidelines. Public education regarding the roles of different specialties in managing sleep disorders may improve care by guiding patients to the appropriate specialties.

Background: s/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.