1.Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Scoliosis Surgery: A Comparison between Conventional Computed Tomography-Based and O-Arm-Based Navigation Techniques.
Toshiaki KOTANI ; Tsutomu AKAZAWA ; Tsuyoshi SAKUMA ; Kayo KOYAMA ; Tetsuharu NEMOTO ; Kento NAWATA ; Atsuro YAMAZAKI ; Shohei MINAMI
Asian Spine Journal 2014;8(3):331-338
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: We compared the accuracy of O-arm-based navigation with computed tomography (CT)-based navigation in scoliotic surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: No previous reports comparing the results of O-arm-based navigation with conventional CT-based navigation in scoliotic surgery have been published. METHODS: A total of 222 pedicle screws were implanted in 29 patients using CT-based navigation (group C) and 416 screws were implanted in 32 patients using O-arm-based navigation (group O). Postoperative CT was performed to assess the screw accuracy, using the established Neo classification (grade 0: no perforation, grade 1: perforation <2 mm, grade 2: perforation > or =2 and <4, and grade 3: perforation > or =4 mm). RESULTS: In group C, 188 (84.7%) of the 222 pedicle screw placements were categorized as grade 0, 23 (10.4%) were grade 1, 11 (5.0%) were grade 2, and 0 were grade 3. In group O, 351 (84.4%) of the 416 pedicle screw placements were categorized as grade 0, 52 (12.5%) were grade 1, 13 (3.1%) were grade 2, and 0 were grade 3. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the prevalence of grade 2.3 perforations between groups C and O. The time to position one screw, including registration, was 10.9+/-3.2 minutes in group C, but was significantly decreased to 5.4+/-1.1 minutes in group O. CONCLUSIONS: O-arm-based navigation facilitates pedicle screw insertion as accurately as conventional CT-based navigation. The use of O-arm-based navigation successfully reduced the time, demonstrating advantages in the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement for scoliotic surgery.
Classification
;
Humans
;
Prevalence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Scoliosis*
;
Spine
;
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
2.Concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation versus conservative treatment for corticosteroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in systemic lupus erythematosus
Yohei TOMARU ; Tomokazu YOSHIOKA ; Junichi NANAKAMURA ; Hisashi SUGAYA ; Shigeo HAGIWARA ; Kento NAWATA ; Seiji OHTORI ; Masashi YAMAZAKI ; Hajime MISHIMA
Journal of Rural Medicine 2021;16(1):1-7
Objective: To compare the outcomes of steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who underwent conservative treatment and concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantationMethods: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was classified according to the Japanese Investigation Committee system. Concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation was performed by aspirating the bone marrow from both iliac crests and then transplanting it to the necrotic area after the core decompression. Patients with >2-year follow-up after the concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation in our institution (Group I) and those with >2-year follow-up after the first hospital visit in a cooperative institution (Group II) were included in this study. After a randomized matching based on age, sex, type, stage, and etiology, the collapse rate in pre-collapsed stages and total hip arthroplasty conversion rate in all stages were compared between the two groups.Results: After the matching adjustment, 33 pairs of hips were included. Preoperatively, 1, 2, 16, and 14 hips were classified as types A, B, C1, and C2, respectively, and 15, 13, 2, and 3 hips were classified as stages 1, 2, 3A, and 3B, respectively. The collapse rates in the pre-collapsed stages were 68% and 39% in Groups I and II, respectively. Total hip arthroplasty conversion rates were 33% and 45% in Groups I and II, respectively. However, Group I had significantly higher and lower conversion rates in stages 1 and 3, respectively (both P<0.05).Conclusion: Conservative treatment may be preferable in stage 1 hips. In addition, concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation may prevent further collapse in stage 3.