During the period between January 1975 and April 1991, 37 patients with acute arterial occulusion of the extremities were admitted to our department and were classified into 2 groups according to their causative factors, including thrombosis and embolism. Among 16 thrombosis patients with involvement of 17 limbs, 4 patients died and 6 limbs were amputated at the time of discharge. On the contrary, among 21 embolism patients with involvement of 25 limbs, 2 patients died and only one limb was amputated. Sixteen of 17 limbs with thrombosis were operated on. Arterial reconstruction was carried out initially on 5 limbs, resulting in successful limb salvage; 3 of 6 limbs which had undergone thrombectomy initially were occluded again soon after the procedure. In the end, 1 limb had to be amputated. On the other hand, 22 of 25 limbs were operated on. Three arterial reconstructions, 18 embolectomies and 1 amputation were carried out initially. All arterial reconstructions and embolectomies were successful. From these results, it was concluded that arterial reconstruction must be done initially for thrombosis patients. For the embolism patients, embolectomy is preferable.

Purpose：The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a test of upper extremity function composed of 12 movement tasks and 14 activities of daily living tasks, and is used as an assessment battery for upper extremity prostheses. The purpose of this study is to examine its validity in clinical practice.Methods：The study included 143 patients with hemiparesis. The validity of SHAP and an existing assessment battery were compared in this study. Factors influencing the validity of differences between dominant and non-dominant hands were examined.Results：Concomitant validity was shown between the SHAP Japanese version and an existing upper extremity function evaluation method. A strong correlation with the subjective evaluation scale was obtained in cases of dominant hand paralysis.Discussion：These results suggested that SHAP is able to accurately evaluate upper extremity hemiparesis, because the difficulty level in evaluation of upper extremity function is higher than that of the Action Research Arm Test, and a ceiling effect is unlikely. Therefore, SHAP is useful in clinical practice not only for assessment of an artificial hand but also for hemiparesis with stroke. Further study to clarify the characteristics of SHAP as well as verification of reliability and standard values is warranted.

Purpose：The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a test of upper extremity function composed of 12 movement tasks and 14 activities of daily living tasks, and is used as an assessment battery for upper extremity prostheses. The purpose of this study is to examine its validity in clinical practice.Methods：The study included 143 patients with hemiparesis. The validity of SHAP and an existing assessment battery were compared in this study. Factors influencing the validity of differences between dominant and non-dominant hands were examined.Results：Concomitant validity was shown between the SHAP Japanese version and an existing upper extremity function evaluation method. A strong correlation with the subjective evaluation scale was obtained in cases of dominant hand paralysis.Discussion：These results suggested that SHAP is able to accurately evaluate upper extremity hemiparesis, because the difficulty level in evaluation of upper extremity function is higher than that of the Action Research Arm Test, and a ceiling effect is unlikely. Therefore, SHAP is useful in clinical practice not only for assessment of an artificial hand but also for hemiparesis with stroke. Further study to clarify the characteristics of SHAP as well as verification of reliability and standard values is warranted.

Objective: In recent years, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise in treating aphasia. While previous reports used the Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA) for evaluation of language functions, the difficulty level of each task in SLTA varies. To show the effects of rTMS in more detail, it is necessary to use weighted values for the SLTA scores. This study aimed to assess the impact of high-frequency rTMS on aphasia using the deviation values of the SLTA.Methods: Thirty-one post-stroke aphasic patients participated in this study [mean (SD) age 58.0 (10.1) years, 15 infarction and 16 hemorrhage] from 2017 to 2021. The average (SD) duration from the onset of stroke to the intervention was 41.1 (31.1) months. Prior to admission, brain sites for rTMS were determined by detecting activation during the word-repeat task using functional MRI. A two-week inpatient treatment, including daily high-frequency rTMS and speech language hearing therapy (excluding Sundays), was conducted. In statistical analysis, SLTA scores were converted into deviation values, with participants grouped by rTMS sites (frontal lobe, temporal lobe, left/right hemisphere) for pre- and post-treatment comparisons.Results: rTMS sites included right frontal lobe (6 cases), left frontal lobe (10 cases), right temporal lobe (5 cases), and left temporal lobe (10 cases). Pre- and post-treatment comparisons showed significant improvements in overall mean scores and speech items in all groups. Additionally, significant enhancements in auditory comprehension items were observed in the right hemisphere and frontal lobe stimulation groups.Conclusion: High-frequency rTMS shows promise that it can improve language function regardless of the stimulation site, and auditory comprehension may be improved specifically by the right hemisphere and left frontal lobe stimulation. This suggests its potential as a valuable therapeutic intervention.