2.Quick-Drying Hand Disinfectants Reconsidered-For Prevention of Hospital Floors from getting Stained-
Kaoru OHE ; Takao OZAKI ; Naoko NISHIMURA ; Kenichi MORISHITA ; Yukio KATO
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2004;53(2):118-122
In August 2001 we began to use WELPAS (a benzalkonium chloride solution) as part of our cost-containment drive, replacing self-made glycerol-added ethanol, which had been used for a long time to prevent nosocomial infections. Since then, blackish stains have become particularly noticeable here and there on the floorboards of the passageways in the hospital wards. The newly adopted quick-drying hand disinfectant was suspected as the culprit. To find the real cause of the dirt, we built a hallway similar to the real passageway for experiment. The disinfectant agents used were WELPAS, WELLUP (chlorhexidine gluconate), HIBISOFT (chlorhexidine gluconate), medicinal ethanol, cationic detergent solution, HIBITANE solution (chlorhexidine hydrochioride) and glycerol solution. These agents and distilled water were dropped on a limited area of the floor respectively for comparison of the degrees of dirt. The cationic detergent solution and WELPAS containing cationic detergent left blackish stains that were hardest to remove. From this finding, it was inferred that the cationic detergent solution was responsible for the dirt on the floor. So we decided to switch to a quick-drying hand disinfectant which does not contain cationic detergents. After considering economic benefit, we chose WELLUP which contains medicinal alcohol plus chlorhexidine gluconate and put it into actual use in October 2003. Since then, the hospitall floors have become unmistakalbly clean.
3.Quick-Drying Hand Disinfectants Reconsidered
Kaoru OHE ; Takao OZAKI ; Naoko NISHIMURA ; Kenichi MORISHITA ; Yukio KATO
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2004;53(2):118-122
In August 2001 we began to use WELPAS (a benzalkonium chloride solution) as part of our cost-containment drive, replacing self-made glycerol-added ethanol, which had been used for a long time to prevent nosocomial infections. Since then, blackish stains have become particularly noticeable here and there on the floorboards of the passageways in the hospital wards. The newly adopted quick-drying hand disinfectant was suspected as the culprit. To find the real cause of the dirt, we built a hallway similar to the real passageway for experiment. The disinfectant agents used were WELPAS, WELLUP (chlorhexidine gluconate), HIBISOFT (chlorhexidine gluconate), medicinal ethanol, cationic detergent solution, HIBITANE solution (chlorhexidine hydrochioride) and glycerol solution. These agents and distilled water were dropped on a limited area of the floor respectively for comparison of the degrees of dirt. The cationic detergent solution and WELPAS containing cationic detergent left blackish stains that were hardest to remove. From this finding, it was inferred that the cationic detergent solution was responsible for the dirt on the floor. So we decided to switch to a quick-drying hand disinfectant which does not contain cationic detergents. After considering economic benefit, we chose WELLUP which contains medicinal alcohol plus chlorhexidine gluconate and put it into actual use in October 2003. Since then, the hospitall floors have become unmistakalbly clean.
Solutions
;
Disinfectants
;
Hand
;
Detergents
;
Desiccation
4.An Examination of Stroke Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation in a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward While Receiving Dialysis Treatment
Joji KATO ; Yasuhiro SHIMIZU ; Kenichi OZAKI ; Takahiro SHIMODAIRA ; Osamu HARA ; Izumi KONDO
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2013;50(9):751-756
Dialysis treatment was first introduced in the convalescent rehabilitation ward after the medical fee revision in April 2012 in Japan. In this study, we examined 4 stroke patients who underwent rehabilitation in the convalescent rehabilitation ward while receiving dialysis. We collected information on the patients' age, sex, disease, dialysis period, duration of hospitalization during the acute and recovery phases, the number of units of exercise, discharge destination after hospital, complications, and their Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. The average age of the subjects( 2 men and 2 women) was 71.0±9.5 years. Two of the 4 patients had cerebral hemorrhage and the other 2 had cerebral infarction. The dialysis period was 16.8±21.7 months. The duration of hospitalization during the acute phase was 50.0±20.3 days, while that in the convalescent rehabilitation ward was 120.0±28.2 days. The average exercise amount per day was 6.01±1.17 units in the convalescent rehabilitation ward. The total FIM score was 59.3±19.2 at admission and 94.5±27.0 at discharge. The FIM efficiency was 0.29±0.16. In all cases, the discharge destination was home. Three of the subjects showed progression of their renal anemia. One subject developed shunt vessel stenosis and one developed delirium as complications. We conclude that rehabilitation in the convalescent rehabilitation ward for dialysis is beneficial to patients due to the increased amount of exercise that they receive. In addition, such rehabilitation enables the patients to return home in good health, similar to the case of non-dialysis patients.
5.Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 80 or Older
Masato Yoshida ; Nobuhiko Mukohara ; Hidefumi Obo ; Nobuchika Ozaki ; Tasuku Honda ; Kenichi Kim ; Kazuhiro Mizoguchi ; Takeshi Inoue ; Keigo Fukase ; Takuya Misato ; Tsutomu Shida
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2006;35(2):61-65
With the progressive aging of the Japanese population, cardiac surgeons are increasingly faced with elderly patients. We have studied 29 consecutive patients, 80 years of age or older, who underwent aortic valve replacement at our institution between January 2000 and December 2003. Mortality, morbidity and late follow-up results were compared to those in 36 patients aged from 64 to 75 years old undergoing the same procedure over the same time period. The older patient group had a significantly higher incidence of calcified aortic stenosis and emergency operations and a higher score of NYHA functional class. Hospital mortality was 2 of 29 (6.9%) in the older patient group and 2 of 36 (5.6%) in the control group (ns). Postoperative renal failure and respiratory failure which needed prolonged ventilator support occured significantly more often in the older patient group. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of hospital stay. Almost all octogenarians showed improved NYHA functional class to class I or II after the operations. The actuarial survival rate was 89% in the older patient group and 78% in the control group at 3 years. The late survival rate and cardiac event-free rate were not significantly different between these 2 groups. Following aortic valve replacement, octogenarians, despite more compromised pre-operative status had good relief of symptoms, a favorable quality of life and a similar late survival to the younger patient groups. These findings support the recommendation that valve replacement should be performed in octogenarians with symptomatic aortic valvular disease.