1.Use of colony-stimulating factor in patients with ovarian cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japan.
Kenichi HARANO ; Akihiro HIRAKAWA ; Takayuki KATO ; Keisuke SUZUKI ; Sachiko WATANABE ; Noriyuki KATSUMATA
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2014;25(2):124-129
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) in patients with ovarian cancer who receive adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy in clinical practice and to assess whether the frequency of CSF use differs among hospitals in Japan. METHODS: CSF use in patients with ovarian cancer who received first-line paclitaxel and carboplatin was analyzed retrospectively using data from the Japanese hospitalization payment system. RESULTS: A total of 1,050 patients at 104 hospitals were identified. The median age was 60 years (range, 22 to 88 years). Of these, 163 patients (15.5%) were diagnosed with neutropenia and 134 patients (12.8%) received CSFs. Among the patients who received CSFs, 125 (93%) received them for the treatment of neutropenia without fever and 1 received them for febrile neutropenia. In total, CSFs were administered for 272 cycles of chemotherapy. Among them, CSFs were used as treatment for neutropenia without fever in 259 cycles (95%), as prophylaxis (primary or secondary) in 12 cycles (4%), and as treatment for febrile neutropenia in 1 cycle. Among hospitals, a median of 4.0% of patients received CSFs with an interquartile range of 25% (Q1, 0%; Q3, 25%). A logistic random effects model showed that the variation in the proportion of patients receiving CSFs among the 104 hospitals was 2.0 (p<0.001), suggesting that the use of CSFs varied across hospitals. CONCLUSION: Most patients received CSFs for neutropenia without fever. Standardized and evidence-based use of CSFs is critically required among hospitals in Japan.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Carboplatin*
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors*
;
Drug Therapy
;
Febrile Neutropenia
;
Fever
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Japan*
;
Neutropenia
;
Ovarian Neoplasms*
;
Paclitaxel*
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Phase 2 single-arm study on the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer
Aikou OKAMOTO ; Eiji KONDO ; Toshiaki NAKAMURA ; Satoshi YANAGIDA ; Junzo HAMANISHI ; Kenichi HARANO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Takeshi HIRASAWA ; Kensuke HORI ; Shinichi KOMIYAMA ; Motoki MATSUURA ; Hidekatsu NAKAI ; Hiroko NAKAMURA ; Jun SAKATA ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Kazuhiro TAKEHARA ; Munetaka TAKEKUMA ; Yoshihito YOKOYAMA ; Yoichi KASE ; Shuuji SUMINO ; Junpei SOEDA ; Ajit SURI ; Daisuke AOKI ; Toru SUGIYAMA
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2021;32(2):e16-
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer.
Methods:
This Phase 2 open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese women with homologous recombination deficiency-positive relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3–4 lines of therapy. The starting dose of niraparib was 300 mg administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or discontinuation. The primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), was assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs.
Results:
Twenty women were enrolled and the confirmed ORR in the full analysis set (FAS) was 35.0% (7/20), consisting of 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. Disease control rate in the FAS was 90.0%. The most frequently reported TEAEs (>50%) were anemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. One patient (5.0%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of niraparib whereas reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (70.0%) and 15 (75.0%) patients, respectively. The median dose intensity (202.9 mg daily) corresponded to a relative dose intensity of 67.6%.
Conclusion
Efficacy and safety of niraparib in heavily pretreated Japanese women was comparable to that seen in an equivalent population of non-Japanese women. No new safety signals were identified.