Purpose: This study is aimed at the evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of gabapentin for the management of cancer-related neuropathic pain in terminally-ill cancer patients. Methods: We investigated terminally-ill cancer patients prescribed gabapentin for the management of cancer-related neuropathic pain, from November 200X to October 200X+2. We assessed average daily pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) before administration, after one week, and while on a stable dose. Result: 44 patients were enrolled during this period and 19 patients completed the study. The medication and the survival period on average were 52.0 and 67.2 days, respectively. The average gabapentin daily dose after one week was 358 mg. The average period needed to reach a stable dose was 11.6 days and the average stable daily dose was 463 mg (male 620 mg, female 289 mg). The mean NRS decreased from 5.7 (before) to 2.1 (after one week, p<0.001) and 1.9 (stable dose, p<0.001), respectively. 57.9% of patients showed side effects, somnolence in 52.6%, delirium in 5.3%, tremor in 5.3%. Conclusion: Gabapentin can be expected to be effective and safe for managing cancer-related neuropathic pain for a long period even when in critical condition through careful titration. Palliat Care Res 2011; 6(1): 101-108

The modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) seems to be one of the best monitoring indicators for palliative sedation. We translated the modified RASS into Japanese according to the standard methods of conducting linguistic validation. The modified RASS revised two points from the original RASS for use in palliative care setting: deleted the description about the ventilator, and added some descriptions to clarify the meaning of RASS+1. In addition, we have deleted the description “rubbing sternum” in the procedure for RASS assessment, and then translated the modified RASS into Japanese. The translators and our research team members repeatedly discussed the linguistic validity until we agreed that the translated Japanese version is equivalent to the English one. The use of the Japanese version of the modified RASS to monitor palliative sedation may help to perform appropriate, and safe palliative sedation.

Purpose and Methods: Infection and neoplastic fever is one of the common complication in patients with advanced cancer. To develop a novel method to differentiate neoplastic fever from infection, we performed a retrospective study of hospitalized terminally ill cancer patients at Seirei Hospice from April 2009 to August 2011. Results: We identified a consecutive sample of 12 patients with neoplastic fever and 12 patients with infection as a control. We extracted demographic data, laboratory data, vital signs and symptoms from medical charts. We found significant differences in difference in C-reacive protein value between afebrile and febrile period (p＜0.001), difference of white blood cell count between afebrile and febrile period (p=0.0017), percentages in neutrophil counts (p=0.023), percentages in lymphocyte counts at base line (p=0.011) and the presence of delirium (p=0.012). Conclusion: These findings suggest that we might differentiate neoplastic fever from infection with common laboratory data and their longitudinal change.

Purpose: To clarify the effect of a palliative care team intervention for nausea of cancer patients. Methods: The study participants were all cancer patients who were referred to a palliative care team in Yodogawa Christian Hospital in 2010, and had nausea with score 2 or over of the Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS－J). The causes of nausea were classified into 4 categories. Etiology－based antiemetic medications were recommended, and the intensities of nausea were assessed using the STAS－J on the day of referral, and 7 days after. Result: Among 27 patients were recruited for this study, 24 were assessed 7 days after. Nine patients had chemically induced nausea, eight had impaired gastric emptying, four had vestibular and central nervous system disturbance, and three had bowel obstruction. The mean STAS－J score significantly decreased from 3.0 (SD, 0.55) on the day of referral to 1.1 (0.80) after 7 days (p＜0.001). Two patients had mild drowsiness. Conclusion: The recommendations of etiology－based antiemetics by the palliative care team may be effective for managing nausea in cancer patients.

Ceftriaxone is one of the easily administrative antibiotics, but little is known about their role in palliative care settings. The aim of this study is to show the effect and the safety of ceftriaxone subcutaneous infusion to infection among advanced cancer patients. Consecutive patients who received ceftriaxone subcutaneous infusion at the Seirei Hospice from January 2013 to January 2014 were enrolled in this retrospective analyses. Primary outcome was the response rate of ceftriaxone, determined by improvement of symptoms within 3 days of ceftriaxone use. Secondary outcomes are inflammatory site reaction, and a comparison of the response rate between ceftriatone and other antibiotics. Among a total of 100 admitted patients, 10 patients used ceftriaxone subcutaneous infusion (4 for urinary tract infection, 4 for pneumonia, 2 for soft tissue infection). The response rate was 70% (95% confidence interval, 39－89). There was no inflammatory symptom at the insertion site observed. For comparisons, 16 patients used other antibiotics with the response rate of 74% (51－88).In conclusion, subcutaneous infusion of ceftriaxone can be useful in the treatment of infections of end－of－life cancer patients, and randomized controlled trial is promising.

Objective: This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and characteristics of anguish among delirious patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care services. Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study at 14 inpatient palliative care units and 10 general wards that offered psycho-oncology consultation service in Japan. We consecutively enrolled the patients with advanced cancer who were diagnosed with delirium and prescribed antipsychotics. Palliative care specialists decided whether patients suffered from anguish or not. We assessed patients’ background and severity of delirium with the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised (DRS-R-98). Results: Of 818 enrolled patients, 99 (12.1%) suffered from anguish. We observed a significant difference in the mean age (68.9±12.6 vs. 72.1±11.2, p=0.009), prevalence of dementia (2% vs. 10.4%, p=0.005) between patients with anguish and those without anguish. Patients with anguish had lower DRS-R-98 total scores before medication than those without anguish (15.3±8.1 vs. 17.3±7.8, p=0.018), but higher severity score in lability of affect (1.2±0.8 vs 1.0±0.9, p=0.023). Conclusions: The results of this study suggested that patients with anguish tend to be younger, mostly do not have dementia, and have lower delirium severity score but higher score in lability of affect. Nevertheless, further research, investigating appropriate evaluations and medical interventions for patients with anguish is warranted.