OBJECTIVE:To investigate the situation and influential factors of hospital pharmacist career planning and career satisfaction and their relationship. METHODS:The questionnaire modified according to"general career planning and career satisfaction scale"was adopted for questionnaire survey among pharmacists in 5 third grade class A hospitals by simple random sampling. The factor analysis was used to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. The influential factors of career planning and satisfaction degree,the relationship of career planning with satisfaction degree were analyzed by multiple regression analysis and Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS:Totally 210 questionnaires were sent out and 198 were effectively received,with effective recovery of 94.28%. Cronbach'α value of reliability and validity test was 0.939(>0.6),and KMO value was 0.905(close to 1). Results of survey showed that there was statistical significance in the effects of gender,age,marital status, work experience,professional title and position on career planning(P<0.05). There was statistical significance in the effects of age and professional title on satisfaction degree(P<0.05). Different dimensions of career planning(self-assessment,career awareness and action,position questions)were positively correlated with career satisfaction degree(total correlation coefficients were 0.649,0.633,0.694). CONCLUSIONS:Career planning is mainly influenced by gender,age,marital status,work experience,professional title and position. Career satisfaction degree is greatly influenced by age and position.The better the career planning is,the higher the satisfaction is. It is suggested to conduct professional training of hospital pharmacists by referring to the theory and experience of management,help pharmacists to fully understand the job responsibilities and do a good job in the position of professional roles. The establishment of scientific and effective career planning management system improves self-management ability of hospital pharmacists and career satisfaction degree,and promotes the development of discipline.

OBJECTIVE To establish the index system of quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care （CWPC） outpatient department， and to provide a basis for the selection of CWPC pharmacist training teachers and the improvement of training plans. METHODS Based on Kirkpatrick model， using the Delphi method， a total of 15 experts from 13 tertiary hospitals in 10 provinces in China were consulted to establish the standard index system of the quality evaluation for CWPC pharmacists training. Analytic hierarchy process （AHP） was adopted to determine the weights of each indicator and quantify the index system according to the weights of indicators at all levels. RESULTS The coefficient of expert authority was 0.810， the judgment coefficient was 0.727， and the familiarity coefficient was 0.893. The Kendall coordination coefficient of each index was 0.308-0.687. The P values of χ2 test were all less than 0.05， which indicated that the degree of coordination of the experts was high. After two rounds of correspondence， Kirkpatrick model-based index system of quality evaluation standard for CWPC pharmacist training was determined. The index system included 4 first-level indexes （participants’ reaction layer， learning gain layer， behavior improvement layer， training outcome layer）， 12 second-level indexes （such as training needs， teaching methods， theoretical knowledge， practical skills， job abilities， patient benefits， etc.） and 44 third-level indexes （such as clear training objectives， core system of CWPC， special device operation and evaluation， professional knowledge related to the treatment of cough and wheeze patients， promoting the construction of CWPC， improving patient compliance）. CONCLUSIONS The constructed index system of quality evaluation standard for CWPC pharmacist training has a certain level of authority and scientificity， and provides a scientific theoretical basis for quality evaluation of CWPC pharmacist training.

OBJECTIVE To construct the evaluation index system for scientific research ability of hospital pharmacists， and provide reference for the improvement of hospital pharmacists’ scientific research ability and the formulation of relevant scientific research policies. METHODS The relevant indexes of scientific research evaluation of hospital pharmacists were extracted by literature analysis， and consultation questionnaire was designed according to Likert grade 5 scoring method. Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of questionnaire consultation for 28 experts， and the weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process. The reliability and validity of index system were analyzed by questionnaire survey. RESULTS After two rounds of expert correspondence， evaluation index system for scientific research ability of hospital pharmacists was finally determined from three core dimensions： basic scientific research ability， scientific research achievements and transformation ability， academic influence and personnel training （including 11 sub-dimensions and 34 measurement items）. The weight value of each dimension index was determined. The result of reliability and validity analysis confirmed the scientific rationality of the index system. CONCLUSIONS The established evaluation index system for scientific research ability of hospital pharmacists is innovative， comprehensive and scientific. The index system model can provide reference for the improvement of hospital pharmacists’ scientific research ability and the formulation of relevant scientific research policies.

OBJECTIVE To systema tically evaluate the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab for acute lymphoblastic leukemia （ALL）in order to provide evidence-based reference for clinical use. METHODS Retrieved from PubMed ，Embase，Web of Science，the Cochrane Library ，CNKI，Wanfang database and CBM during the inception to February 3，2022，randomized controlled trials （RCTs）and cohort studies of blinatumomab （experimental group ） versus conventional chemotherapy （control group ）in the treatment of ALL were collected. After literature screening and data extraction ，the quality of RCTs was evaluated by the risk bias evaluation tool recommended by Cochrane handbook 5.1.0，and the quality of cohort studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale （NOS）. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4 software. GRADE grading system was used to evaluate the evidence quality of outcomes. The publication bias was analyzed by inverted funnel plot. RESULTS A total of 8 studies were included ，involving 3 RCTs and 5 cohort studies ，with a total of 2 841 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed that the overall survival rate more than one year [RR ＝1.30，95％CI（1.14，1.48），P＜0.000 1]，relapse-free survival rate [RR ＝1.78，95％CI（1.50，2.12），P＜0.000 01]，complete remission rate [RR ＝1.42，95％CI（1.11，1.82），P＝0.006]，the incidence of tremor [RR ＝16.98，95％CI（2.17，133.12），P＝0.007]，and the incidence of cytokine release syndrome [RR ＝14.11， 95％CI（3.43，58.01），P＝0.000 2] in trial group were all significantly higher than control group ，but there was no statistical significance in the incidence of headache between two groups [RR ＝1.31，95％CI（0.66，2.59），P＝0.44]. The incidence of adverse events with grade more than or equal to 3，infection，stomatitis，thrombocytopenia，febrile neutropenia ，anorexia， constipation，diarrhea，abdominal pain ，hypokalemia in trial group were significantly lower than control group （P＜0.05）. The incidence of cough ，rash and hypogamma globulinemia and fever in the trial group were significantly higher than control group （P＜0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the total incidence of adverse events ，sepsis，anemia，leucopenia，neutropenia， lymphopenia，nausea，vomiting，hyperglycemia，hypotension，hypertension，elevated transaminase or epistaxis between two groups（P＞0.05）. Results of subgroup analysis by study type showed that the overall survival rate ，relapse-free survival rate and complete response rate （except for cohort studies ）of patients in trial group were significantly higher than control group in both RCTs and cohort studies （P＜0.05）. The results of GRADE evaluation showed that the overall quality of index evidence included in this study was low. There was little possibility of publication bias in this study based on the publication bias analysis. CONCLUSIONS Blinatumomab is effective in the treatment of ALL ，with low incidence of infection and adverse events of digestive system ，but high incidence of tremor ，cough，rash，fever，hypoproglobulinemia and cytokine release syndrome. The evidence quality of the indicators included in this study is generally low .