Methods: This was a retrospective study on normal lumbar spine lateral radiographs of patients who presented with low back pain and were reviewed by two observers. Different inclination angles were constructed to estimate the safety zones of the pedicle screws’ sagittal inclination. Results: Radiographs of 30 consecutive patients, 25 females and five males, with a mean age of 39.43±11.18 years, were studied. The mean angle of the interlaminar line and the pedicle axis was almost orthogonal at all the levels, with a range of 89.16°–94.63°, which was not affected by the lumbar sagittal profile. The safety zones of the pedicle screws were measured, and they revealed a safe sagittal range of 19.73°–24.40° if the screw was inserted from the pedicle axis, 21.03°–22.59° if inserted from the most cephalic part, and 13.31°–17.03° if inserted from the most caudal part. Conclusions Our results confirmed the perpendicularity of the interlaminar line with the pedicle axis in the lumbar spine at all the levels. The interlaminar line is a useful guide for pedicle screw sagittal inclination.

Methods: This was a retrospective study on the computed tomography (CT) chest scans of patients with no spinal pathologies. The ILL–PA, superior and inferior safe angles of the pedicle screw trajectories, and the exit zone of the screw perpendicular to the ILL were reviewed by two observers via three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction mode of the Horos DICOM software (https:// horosproject.org/). Results: The CT chest images of 30 consecutive patients (20 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 49.87±15.48 years (range, 24–74 years) were evaluated. The mean ILL–PA angle was almost orthogonal for all levels. This angle ranged between 86.21°±3.01° at D5 and 90.59°±2.72° at D10. The safety zones of the sagittal inclination of the pedicle screws were demonstrated. The results revealed that the least safe angle was when the screw was directed cranially along the middle part of the pedicle between 4.43°±0.75° at D8 and 6.94°±1.19° at D11. Conclusions The results of this study confirmed the ILL–PA angle perpendicularity in the thoracic spine at all levels. The ILL is a useful guide for pedicle screw sagittal inclination.

Methods: This was a retrospective study on the computed tomography (CT) chest scans of patients with no spinal pathologies. The ILL–PA, superior and inferior safe angles of the pedicle screw trajectories, and the exit zone of the screw perpendicular to the ILL were reviewed by two observers via three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction mode of the Horos DICOM software (https:// horosproject.org/). Results: The CT chest images of 30 consecutive patients (20 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 49.87±15.48 years (range, 24–74 years) were evaluated. The mean ILL–PA angle was almost orthogonal for all levels. This angle ranged between 86.21°±3.01° at D5 and 90.59°±2.72° at D10. The safety zones of the sagittal inclination of the pedicle screws were demonstrated. The results revealed that the least safe angle was when the screw was directed cranially along the middle part of the pedicle between 4.43°±0.75° at D8 and 6.94°±1.19° at D11. Conclusions The results of this study confirmed the ILL–PA angle perpendicularity in the thoracic spine at all levels. The ILL is a useful guide for pedicle screw sagittal inclination.

Methods: A cohort of 54 consecutive patients with DLS and RO was included in the study. All the included patients underwent selective RO fusion and at least 2 years of follow-up. They were divided into two groups: group 1 with a curve <30° and group 2 with a curve ≥30°. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numerical Rating Scale. The radiological assessment included RO location, offset and subluxated-disc orientation, Cobb angle, and coronal as well as sagittal alignments. Results: The offset value was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (13.4±4.7 mm vs. 9.3±3.5 mm, p<0.001). The subluxated disc was mainly oriented to the concave side in group 2 (15/21) but to the convex side in group 1 (20/33) (p =0.022). Group 2 had a higher rate of postoperative adjacent RO than group 1 (14/21 vs. 1/33, p<0.001). The ODI was comparable between both groups preoperatively but higher at the final follow-up in group 2 (34.9±9.5) than in group 1 (24.4±6.2). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve was identified as the risk factor for postoperative adjacent RO (odds ratio, 1.400; p=0.007). The receiver operating characteristic analysis verified it with an area under the curve of 0.960 (p<0.001). Conclusions The clinical and radiological outcomes were maintained well in group 1 but not in group 2. Selective RO fusion in DLS with a lumbar curve <30° is a rational option. However, it should be avoided in those with a lumbar curve >30° because of a higher complication rate and a worse clinical outcome at the final follow-up.