Using the data of 139 ovarian cancer cases at our hospital, we investigated the effect of jingizai on prognosis when it was combined with standard therapy for ovarian cancer and prognosis by histopathological types. Combining jingizai with standard therapy was not effective in cases of stage I-II ovarian cancer, but it was effective in cases of stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Upon examination the effectiveness of jingizai according to histopathological types, we observed some improved prognosis in serous adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma cases ; however, prognosis didn't improve in endometrioid adenocarcinoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma. These results indicate that the effectiveness of combining jingizai with standard therapy may differ depending on histological type of ovarian cancer. When we investigated the difference between the distribution of histopathological types by cancer staging, we frequently found clear cell adenocarcinoma in stage I-II cancer cases. Also, serous adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma had a high frequency among stage III-IV cancer cases. This difference may be the reason that the effectiveness of jingizai is different depending on the advances of each stage. However, no statistical difference was confirmed due to the small number of subjects analyzed. Analysis of larger sample size, which can be collected by performing collaborative studies with other facilities, will be required for more detailed investigation.

Objective: The drug use-results survey of Metronidazole gel (Rozex® gel 0.75%: hereinafter, this is called “this medicine”) was conducted for the purpose of assessing the safety and effectiveness of this medicine in clinical practice including long-term use. Methods: Patients who initiated treatment with this medicine for sterilization and reduction of odor at cancerous skin ulcer for the first time were registered by the central registration method. The longest period of observation was 1 year. Results: The safety analysis set included 301 patients. The incidence proportion of adverse drug reaction was 3.32% (in 10 of 301 patients), with no serious events. The overall improvement rate was 73.7% (in 205 of 278 patients). At the final observation, the improvement rate of odor by physician's assessment was 80.2% (in 203 of 253 patients) and the improvement rate of patient's satisfaction was 70.1% (in 82 of 117 patients), respectively. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that this medicine is safe and effective for sterilization and reduction of odor at cancerous skin ulcer, and leads to high treatment satisfaction of patients.