2.Simplified instructional phrasing in dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation - when 'less is more'.
Philip Weng Kee LEONG ; Benjamin Sieu-Hon LEONG ; Shalini ARULANANDAM ; Marie Xin Ru NG ; Yih Yng NG ; Marcus Eng Hock ONG ; Desmond Ren Hao MAO
Singapore medical journal 2021;62(12):647-652
INTRODUCTION:
In our national emergency dispatch centre, the standard protocol for dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DACPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) involves the instruction 'push 100 times a minute 5 cm deep'. As part of quality improvement, the instruction was simplified to 'push hard and fast'.
METHODS:
We analysed all dispatcher-diagnosed OHCAs over four months in 2018: January to February ('push 100 times a minute 5 cm deep') and August to September ('push hard and fast'). We also performed secondary per-protocol analysis based on the protocol used: (a) standard (n = 48); (b) simplified (n = 227); and (c) own words (n = 231).
RESULTS:
A total of 506 cases were included: 282 in the 'before' group and 224 in the 'after' group. Adherence to the protocol was 15.2% in the 'before' phase and 72.8% in the 'after' phase (p < 0.001). The mean time between instruction and first compression for the 'before' and 'after' groups was 34.36 seconds and 26.83 seconds, respectively (p < 0.001). Time to first compression was 238.62 seconds and 218.83 seconds in the 'before' and 'after' groups, respectively (p = 0.016). In the per-protocol analysis, the interval between instruction and compression was 37.19 seconds, 28.31 seconds and 32.40 seconds in the standard protocol, simplified protocol and 'own words' groups, respectively (p = 0.005). The need for paraphrasing was 60.4% in the standard protocol group and 81.5% in the simplified group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Simplified instructions were associated with a shorter interval between instruction and first compression. Efforts should be directed at simplifying DACPR instructions.
3.Return to sport and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a single-institution experience.
Yeow Boon TAN ; Ken Lee PUAH ; Roland Weng WAH CHONG ; Kee Leong ONG ; Yi-Jia LIM ; Dave Yee HAN LEE
Singapore medical journal 2022;63(8):433-438
INTRODUCTION:
Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a widely accepted procedure to treat recurrent shoulder dislocation. This study aims to describe our experience with arthroscopic Bankart repair and its functional outcome.
METHODS:
107 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2008 to 2013 were followed up for a minimum of three years and reviewed by an independent observer. 80 consented to being interviewed using the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) and Simple Shoulder Test.
RESULTS:
82 shoulders (two bilateral) were studied. Mean age at first dislocation was 19.4 ± 3.4 (12.0-31.0) years. Mean follow-up was 4.4 ± 1.3 (3.0-9.0) years and 2.5 ± 3.0 (0.1-15.4) years elapsed from first dislocation to surgery. 41 (50.0%) patients played overhead or contact sports and 44 (53.7%) played competitive sports before injury; 8 (9.8%) patients reported recurrence of dislocation, which was significantly associated with playing competitive sports before injury (p <0.039), 5 (6.1%) underwent revision surgery and 22 (26.8%) reported residual instability after surgery. 49 (59.8%) patients returned to playing sports, 75 (91.5%) were satisfied with their surgery and 79 (96.3%) were willing to undergo the surgery again. 74 (90.2%) patients had two-year good/excellent OSIS, which was significantly associated with playing competitive sports before injury (p = 0.039), self-reported stability after surgery (p = 0.017), satisfaction with surgery (p = 0.018) and willingness to undergo surgery again (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSION
Arthroscopic Bankart repair yields good functional outcomes and is associated with high patient satisfaction, although not all patients return to sports.
Humans
;
Adolescent
;
Young Adult
;
Adult
;
Shoulder Dislocation/complications*
;
Joint Instability/surgery*
;
Shoulder Joint/surgery*
;
Return to Sport
;
Patient Satisfaction
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Recurrence
;
Arthroscopy/methods*