1.Cervical Symmetric Dumbbell Ganglioneuromas Causing Severe Paresis.
Akira HIOKI ; Kei MIYAMOTO ; Yoshinobu HIROSE ; Yusuke KITO ; Kazunari FUSHIMI ; Katsuji SHIMIZU
Asian Spine Journal 2014;8(1):74-78
We report an extremely rare case with bilateral and symmetric dumbbell ganglioneuromas of the cervical spine in an elderly patient. A 72-year-old man came by ambulance to our hospital due to progressive incomplete paraplegia. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated bilateral symmetric dumbbell tumors at the C1/2 level. We performed total resection of the intracanalar tumor, aiming at complete decompression of the spinal cord, and partial and subtotal resection of foraminal outside portions. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen indicated the tumor cells to be spindle cells with the presence of ganglion cells and no cellular pleomorphism, suggesting a diagnosis of ganglioneuroma. Although the surgery was not curative, the postoperative course was uneventful and provided a satisfactory outcome. This is the fourth known case of cervical ganglioneuromas of the bilateral symmetric dumbbell type.
Aged
;
Ambulances
;
Decompression
;
Diagnosis
;
Ganglion Cysts
;
Ganglioneuroma*
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Paraplegia
;
Paresis*
;
Spinal Cord
;
Spine
2.Sagittal Alignment of a Strut Graft Affects Graft Subsidence and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion.
Koun YAMAUCHI ; Kazunari FUSHIMI ; Kei MIYAMOTO ; Akira HIOKI ; Katsuji SHIMIZU ; Haruhiko AKIYAMA
Asian Spine Journal 2017;11(5):739-747
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of sagittal alignment of the strut graft on graft subsidence and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: ACCF is a common technique for the treatment of various cervical pathologies. Although graft subsidence sometimes occurs after ACCF, it is one cause for poor clinical results. Malalignment of the strut graft is probably one of the factors associated with graft subsidence. However, to the best of our knowledge, no prior reports have demonstrated correlations between the alignment of the strut graft and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated 56 patients (33 men and 23 women; mean age, 59 years; range, 33–84 years; 45 with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 11 with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament) who underwent one- or two-level ACCF with an autogenous fibular strut graft and anterior plating. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score recovery ratio for cervical spondylotic myelopathy was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The JOA score and lateral radiograms were evaluated 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups (a straight group [group I] and an oblique group [group Z]) based on radiographic assessment of the sagittal alignment of the strut graft. RESULTS: Group I showed a significantly greater JOA score recovery ratio (p<0.05) and a significantly lower graft subsidence than group Z (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a straight alignment of the strut graft provides better clinical outcomes and lower incidence of graft subsidence after ACCF. In contrast, an oblique strut graft can lead to significantly increased strut graft subsidence and poor clinical results.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Bone Transplantation
;
Cervical Vertebrae
;
Clinical Study
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Male
;
Pathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Cord Compression
;
Spinal Cord Diseases
;
Spinal Fusion
;
Transplants*
3.Compensatory Pelvic Retro-Rotation Associated with a Decreased Quality of Life in Patients with Normal Sagittal Balance
Tetsuya SHIMOKAWA ; Kei MIYAMOTO ; Akira HIOKI ; Takahiro MASUDA ; Kazunari FUSHIMI ; Hiroyasu OGAWA ; Kazuichiro OHNISHI ; Haruhiko AKIYAMA
Asian Spine Journal 2022;16(2):241-247
Methods:
Overall, 134 subjects aged ≥20 years with lower back pain were included (104 females; mean age, 70±9.8 years). Sagittal vertical alignment (SVA) and PT were analyzed radiographically. Patients were stratified into three groups based on SVA values: good alignment (group G), intermediate alignment (group I), and poor sagittal alignment (group P). Patients in group I were further categorized into two groups: low PT and high PT. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was used for clinical assessment, and the scores were compared between groups.
Results:
As SVA increased, PT and lumbar lordosis (LL) increased and decreased, respectively. PT and LL differed significantly between groups G and P (p<0.01 for each comparison). Within group I, there was no significant difference in SVA between the high PT and low PT groups, suggesting that the high PT group had acquired a compensated sagittal balance. Importantly, all domains in the JOABPEQ (except for lower back pain) were significantly lower in the high PT group than in the low PT group (p<0.05 for every comparison).
Conclusions
This study showed that focusing solely on SVA as a single indicator can cause important losses in QOL to be overlooked in patients with lumbar disorders. Although pelvic retroversion can compensate for sagittal balance, it is associated with a significant decrease in QOL. To improve the assessment of patients with lumbar disorders, PT should be considered besides SVA.