1.A case of reversible disturbance of consciousness following leptomeningeal metastases
Kazuki Shimada ; Syo Goya ; Teppei Tsumori ; Mika Saijyo ; Taizo Higami ; Eriko Tani ; Sawa Takeoka ; Kanako Kurata ; Ayako Tanaka ; Masanari Hamaguchi ; Motohiro Tamiya ; Takayuki Shiroyama ; Naoko Morishita ; Norio Okamoto ; Hidekazu Suzuki ; Tomonori Hirashima ; Ichiro Kawase
Palliative Care Research 2014;9(4):528-532
Introduction:Hyponatremia, which is frequently present in patients with end-stage cancer, causes delirium and disturbance of consciousness and is considered a poor prognostic factor. We report a case of hyponatremia with hypopituitarism in association with leptomeningeal metastasis, resulting in reversible disturbance of consciousness. Case report:A 77 year-old female received chemotherapy at our hospital for postoperative recurrence of lung cancer, and best supportive care due to a side effect. After transfer to another hospital, she experienced a sudden disturbance of consciousness and was returned to our hospital. A detailed examination resulted in a diagnosis of hyponatremia from hypopituitarism following leptomeningeal metastasis involving the cerebral ventricles. Hyponatremia was improved by NaCl supplement and hormone replacement, followed by recovery from disturbance of consciousness. Discussion:QOL of patients with end-stage cancer can be improved through the active treatment of reversible causes of disturbance of consciousness. Conclusion:When severe hyponatremia is detected in cancer patients, it is important to consider the possibility of hypopituitarism with brain metastasis or meninges dissemination in the differential diagnosis.
2.Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey
Yoshihide KANNO ; Tetsuya OHIRA ; Yoshihiro HARADA ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Yoshiki KOIKE ; Taku YAMAGATA ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Kaori MASU ; Keisuke YONAMINE ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Megumi TANAKA ; Tomohiro SHIMADA ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Kazuki ENDO ; Haruka OKANO ; Daichi KOMABAYASHI ; Takeshi SHIMIZU ; Shohei SUZUKI ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2021;54(3):340-347
Background/Aims:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy.
Methods:
In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated.
Results:
Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations.
Conclusions
Propofol sedation was found to be safe—without severe adverse events or accidents—for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening.
3.Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey
Yoshihide KANNO ; Tetsuya OHIRA ; Yoshihiro HARADA ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Yoshiki KOIKE ; Taku YAMAGATA ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Kaori MASU ; Keisuke YONAMINE ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Megumi TANAKA ; Tomohiro SHIMADA ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Kazuki ENDO ; Haruka OKANO ; Daichi KOMABAYASHI ; Takeshi SHIMIZU ; Shohei SUZUKI ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2021;54(3):340-347
Background/Aims:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy.
Methods:
In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated.
Results:
Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations.
Conclusions
Propofol sedation was found to be safe—without severe adverse events or accidents—for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening.