One of the target points in the PMDA 2nd midterm plan (FY2009-2013) is reinforcement and enhancement of the system for safety evaluation for pharmaceuticals using expanded data sources beyond spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). To achieve this goal, PMDA started investigation in FY2009 to develop methodology to utilize electronic medical information for secondary purpose of safety evaluation of pharmaceuticals. (MIHARI project- Medical Information for Risk Assessment Initiative)
Data sources targeted in MIHARI project are claims data, diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) data, hospital information system (HIS) data, etc.
Secondary use of electronic medical information for safety evaluation is expected to enable safety evaluation based on quantitative analysis, which has been difficult so far. It will also provide faster and easier way of evaluation compared to collecting primary data from study planned and conducted just for the purpose.
PMDA intends to establish the system to utilize electronic medical information (eg. claim data, DPC data, HIS data) practically for safety evaluation by the end of FY2013. Aiming for this, PMDA is conducting various pilot studies using currently available data in the MIHARI project. Here we report on recent developments of this project.

PMDA started MIHARI project in FY2009 to enhance drug safety assessment by developing ways to utilize electronic medical information as additional data sources to spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. The project has been established according to PMDA's second midterm plan. In this article, we will introduce latest two studies (pilot studies No. 4 and 5) using data of standardized electronic medical record(EMR) called SS-MIX (standardized structured medical record information exchange) data out of our several pilot studies. SS-MIX is a standard specification published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. In these studies, anonymized SS-MIX data were provided by six collaborative hospitals respectively. In pilot study No. 4, we explored approaches for evaluating the impact of regulatory action which instructed relevant manufacturers to revise package inserts of sitagliptin phosphate hydrate (sitagliptin) to call physician's attention. The revision was about reducing dose of sulfonylurea (SU) to avoid serious hypoglycemia when it is prescribed concomitantly with sitagliptin. As indicators of the impact, we evaluated changes in proportion of concomitant use and average SU dose before and after the action and estimated the risk of hypoglycemia in concomitant users compared to SU alone users before and after the action. In conclusion, evaluating impact of the regulatory action using SS-MIX data was technically feasible; however, it was difficult to analyze with adequate accuracy due to limited size of the data. In pilot study No. 5, we examined validity of outcome definitions for hyperthyroidism which were applied to combinations of some data elements of SS-MIX data to identify the patients. Three types of outcome definitions were prepared; 1) definitive diagnosis of hyperthyroidism, 2) prescription of medication for hyperthyroidism, 3) prescription of medication for hyperthyroidism in or after the month in which definitive diagnosis of hyperthyroidism was given. Criteria for case ascertainment were determined according to relevant clinical guidelines. After the cases were ascertained, positive predictives values were calculated. The results suggested that using information on prescription of medication improves validity of definition of outcome. The findings from pilot studies in MIHARI project have been utilized in another project which PMDA is carrying forward now (EMR network project). The findings would be also helpful when we use data from this network. (Jpn J Pharmacoepidemiol 2013；18(1)：23-29)

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To investigate the oncological outcomes, including distant relapse, after en bloc spondylectomy (EBS) for spinal metastases in patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although EBS has been reported to be locally curative and extend survival in select patients with spinal metastases, detailed reports regarding the control of distant relapse after EBS are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 18 consecutive patients (median age at EBS, 62 years; range, 40–77 years) who underwent EBS for spinal metastases between 1991 and 2015. The primary cancer sites included the kidney (n=7), thyroid (n=4), liver (n=3), and other locations (n=4). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank method. RESULTS: The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 767.5 minutes and 2,375 g, respectively. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced perioperative complications. Five patients (27.8%) experienced local recurrence of the tumor at a median of 12.5 months after EBS, four of which had a positive resection margin status. Thirteen patients (72.2%) experienced distant relapse at a median of 21 months after EBS. The estimated median survival period after distant relapse was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 0.71–39.29 months). No association was found between resection margin status and distant relapse. Overall, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates after EBS were 72.2%, 48.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. Importantly, the era in which EBS was performed did not impact the oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EBS by itself, even if margin-free, cannot prevent further dissemination, which occurred in >70% of patients at a median of 21 months after EBS. These results should be considered and conveyed to patients for clinical decision-making.
Clinical Decision-Making ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney ; Liver ; Methods ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Operative Time ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine ; Survival Rate ; Thyroid Gland

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The effects of Histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors on the gastrointestinal motility have not yet been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of intravenous bolus administration of famotidine and omeprazole on the rate of gastric emptying using the continuous 13C breath test (BreathID system, Exalenz Bioscience Ltd, Israel). METHODS: Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in this randomized, 3-way crossover study. After fasting overnight, the subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg of famotidine, 20 mg of omeprazole or 20 mL of saline alone by intravenous bolus injection before a test meal (200 kcal per 200 mL, containing 100 mg of 13C-acetate). Gastric emptying was monitored for 4 hours after the ingestion of test meal by the 13C-acetic acid breath test performed using the BreathID system. RESULTS: No significant differences in the calculated parameters, namely, the T1/2, Tlag, GEC, beta and kappa, were observed among the 3 test conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that intravenous administration of gastric acid suppressant drugs had no significant influence on the rate of gastric emptying in comparison with that of saline alone as a placebo. Our results indicating the absence of any effect of either famotidine or omeprazole on accelerating the rate of gastric emptying suggest that both medications can be administered safely to patients suffering from hemorrhagic peptic ulcers who need to be kept nil by mouth from the viewpoint of possible acceleration of gastrointestinal motility in the clinical setting.
Acceleration ; Administration, Intravenous ; Breath Tests ; Cross-Over Studies ; Eating ; Famotidine ; Fasting ; Gastric Acid ; Gastric Emptying ; Gastrointestinal Motility ; Humans ; Male ; Meals ; Mouth ; Omeprazole ; Peptic Ulcer ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; Proton Pumps ; Protons ; Stress, Psychological