1.Complications in the management of closed high-energy proximal tibial plateau fractures.
Kavin KHATRI ; Vijay SHARMA ; Darsh GOYAL ; Kamran FAROOQUE
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2016;19(6):342-347
PURPOSETo report complications in the management of complex closed proximal tibial fractures.
METHODA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the infectious and noninfectious complications encountered in the management of high-energy Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures. All patients were treated at the level 1 trauma centre between January 2011 and March 2014. Sixty two patients were included in the study. The mean patient age was (43.16 ± 11.59) years with 60 males and 2 females. Infectious complications like superficial and deep infection, wound dehiscence, malalignment in the immediate postoperative period and in follow-up period were noted.
RESULTSThe overall complication rate was 30.65% (19 out of 62). Infectious complications were noted in 20.97% cases (13/62). In majority of the cases (8/13), superficial infection was seen which managed with regular dressing and antibiotic administration. The patients (5/13) who had developed deep-seated infection were subjected to repeated debridements, flap coverage, implant removal or amputation depending upon the host response. Thirteen patients had experienced noninfectious complications. Hardware related complications were noticed in six patients and four among them received a secondary procedure. Malalignment was observed in seven patients but only single patient underwent subsequent operative intervention.
CONCLUSIONProximal tibial plateau fractures especially Shatzker type V and VI are associated with extensive soft tissue damage even in closed injuries. The complications encountered in the management of these fractures can be minimized with appropriate patient selection and minimal soft tissue dissection.
Adult ; Fasciotomy ; Female ; Fracture Fixation ; adverse effects ; Fractures, Closed ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Tibial Fractures ; surgery
2.Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of distal tibial fractures using anterolateral locking plate: Evaluation of results and complications.
Devendra LAKHOTIA ; Gaurav SHARMA ; Kavin KHATRI ; G-N KUMAR ; Vijay SHARMA ; Kamran FAROOQUE
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2016;19(1):39-44
PURPOSESoft tissue healing is of paramount importance in distal tibial fractures for a successful outcome. There is an increasing trend of using anterolateral plate due to an adequate soft tissue cover on ante- rolateral distal tibia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of minimally invasive anterolateral locking plate in distal tibial fractures.
METHODSThis is a retrospective study of 42 patients with distal tibial fractures treated with minimally invasive anterolateral tibial plating. This study evaluates the bone and soft tissue healing along with emphasis on complications related to bone and soft tissue healing.
RESULTSFull weight bearing was allowed in mean time period of 4.95 months (3-12 months). A major local complication of a wound which required revision surgery was seen in one case. Minor complications were identified in 9 cases which comprised 4 cases of marginal necrosis of the surgical wound, 1 case of superficial infection, 1 case of sensory disturbance over the anterolateral foot, 1 case of muscle hernia and 2 cases of delayed union. Mean distance between the posterolateral and anterolateral incision was 5.7 cm (4.5-8 cm).
CONCLUSIONThe minimally invasive distal tibial fixation with anterolateral plating is a safe method of stabilization. Distance between anterolateral and posterolateral incision can be placed less than 7 cm apart depending on fracture pattern with proper surgical timing and technique.
Adult ; Aged ; Bone Plates ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Tibial Fractures ; surgery
3.Neglected Thoraco Lumbar Traumatic Spine Injuries.
Kavin KHATRI ; Kamran FAROOQUE ; Vijay SHARMA ; Babita GUPTA ; Shivanand GAMANAGATTI
Asian Spine Journal 2016;10(4):678-684
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To outline the etiology, complications and management difficulties encountered in the management of neglected thoracolumbar spine injuries. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The English literature describes overlooked diagnosis as the most common cause of neglected spine injuries. However, the reasons differ in developing or under-developed nations. Moreover, there is scarcity of literature about the neglected spinal injuries. METHODS: Patients presenting with thoracolumbar traumatic injuries who had not received any form of treatment for more than three weeks were included in the study. The demographic details, operative procedure performed and complications encountered, along with American Spinal Injury Association grade and spinal cord independence measure score recorded on the history sheets were noted. The data were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study. Inadequate treatment at the first contact hospital (45%) followed by late presentation (38%) and missed injury (17%) were the major etiological factors for the neglected traumatic injuries in the thoracolumbar spine. The most common complications seen in the management of these cases were pressure sores (58%), back pain (57%), urinary tract infection (42%) and residual kyphotic deformity (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Management of neglected thoracolumbar injuries is challenging. The delay in presentation should not prevent spine surgeon in proceeding with operative intervention as good results can be expected.
Back Pain
;
Congenital Abnormalities
;
Developing Countries
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Neglected Diseases
;
Pressure Ulcer
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Cord
;
Spinal Cord Injuries
;
Spinal Fractures
;
Spinal Injuries
;
Spine*
;
Surgical Procedures, Operative
;
Urinary Tract Infections
4.Postoperative Epidural Fibrosis Prevention: Which Is Better–Autologous Fat versus Gelfoam
Karan RAJPAL ; Jagdeep SINGH ; Raj BAHADUR ; Kapil BANSAL ; Radhe SHYAM ; Kavin KHATRI
Asian Spine Journal 2022;16(3):343-351
Methods:
The study was conducted on 100 adult patients. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 50 patients each: group A, autologous fat group, and group B, Gelfoam group. The postoperative follow-up was conducted at intervals of 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Both groups were evaluated clinically (Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire [ODI], Visual Analog Scale [VAS], Straight Leg Raising Test [SLRT]) and radiologically (using Ross grading by contrast magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) for development of radicular pain and hence EF.
Results:
Based on the analysis, improvement in mean values of ODI score, VAS score, and SLRT were found to be statistically significant postoperatively at intervals of 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months when compared individually in both groups. However, improvement was greater in the autologous fat group than in the Gelfoam group. Based on contrast-enhanced MRI, the number of patients who developed EF was smaller in the autologous fat group than in the Gelfoam group.
Conclusions
In the present study, on clinical and radiological assessment, we conclude that both groups prevent radicular pain and postoperative EF individually but relatively autologous fat was found to be more effective than Gelfoam in the prevention of EF and hence radicular pain.