Thymic epithelial tumors are treated with reference to the Masaoka staging system. In 1999, the World Health Organization published a histologic classification of thymomas. The WHO classification was revised in 2004. There is a general consensus that it is as important a prognostic factor in primary thymoma and thymic carcinoma patients as the Masaoka staging system. In the present study, a total of 25 cases of thymic epithelial tumors (21 thymoma cases and 4 thymic carcinoma cases) treated from 1991 through 2005 in our hospital were reclassified based on the new WHO classification. The thymoma cases consisted of four at Masaoka's stage I, 11 cases at stage II and six cases at stage III, whereas according to the WHO classification they were categorized into seven B1 type tumors, eight B2 type, four B3 type and two unclassifiable cases. Of the four thymic carcinoma cases, one belonged under Masaoka's stage II, another under stage III and two under stage IV. One thymic carcinoma case resulted in death. There were no fatalities from thymomas. Most of the thymomas at Masaoka's stage III came under WHO type B2 and B3, showing a high incidence of local infiltration. Since either the WHO classification or the Masaoka staging system is an important factor for determining the course of treatment, we concluded that both should be utilized clinically.
Diagnostic Neoplasm Staging ; Classification of information ; seconds ; Carcinoma ; Thymic

Background/Aims: Bowel urgency is an important symptom for quality of life determination in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Few clinical studies have focused on bowel urgency as an efficacy endpoint. Budesonide foam enema has shown efficacy for clinical and endoscopic improvement in mild-to-moderate UC. We evaluated the improvement of clinical symptoms (bowel urgency), safety, and treatment impact of twice-daily budesonide foam enema on the quality of life in patients with UC. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, prospective observational study comprised a 4-week observation period assessing the effectiveness and safety of twice-daily budesonide foam enema. Mild-to-moderate UC patients who had bowel urgency were included. Patients collected data daily in an electronic patient-reported outcome system or logbooks. The primary endpoint was the rate of resolution of bowel urgency at the end of the 4-week observation period. The rate of bowel incontinence was also assessed. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. Of patients with a final evaluation, the rate of resolution of bowel urgency was 58.5% (31/53; 95% confidence interval, 44.1%–71.9%). Bowel urgency decreased over time, with a significant difference observed on day 7 versus day 0. Bowel incontinence showed a decreasing trend from day 5, with a significant difference confirmed on day 12 versus day 0. The clinical remission rate was 64.4% (38/59; 95% confidence interval, 50.9%–76.4%). One adverse event not related to budesonide rectal foam occurred. Conclusions The findings suggest that bowel urgency can be improved early with twice-daily budesonide foam enema. No new safety signals were observed.

Background/Aims: Bowel urgency is an important symptom for quality of life determination in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Few clinical studies have focused on bowel urgency as an efficacy endpoint. Budesonide foam enema has shown efficacy for clinical and endoscopic improvement in mild-to-moderate UC. We evaluated the improvement of clinical symptoms (bowel urgency), safety, and treatment impact of twice-daily budesonide foam enema on the quality of life in patients with UC. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, prospective observational study comprised a 4-week observation period assessing the effectiveness and safety of twice-daily budesonide foam enema. Mild-to-moderate UC patients who had bowel urgency were included. Patients collected data daily in an electronic patient-reported outcome system or logbooks. The primary endpoint was the rate of resolution of bowel urgency at the end of the 4-week observation period. The rate of bowel incontinence was also assessed. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. Of patients with a final evaluation, the rate of resolution of bowel urgency was 58.5% (31/53; 95% confidence interval, 44.1%–71.9%). Bowel urgency decreased over time, with a significant difference observed on day 7 versus day 0. Bowel incontinence showed a decreasing trend from day 5, with a significant difference confirmed on day 12 versus day 0. The clinical remission rate was 64.4% (38/59; 95% confidence interval, 50.9%–76.4%). One adverse event not related to budesonide rectal foam occurred. Conclusions The findings suggest that bowel urgency can be improved early with twice-daily budesonide foam enema. No new safety signals were observed.

Background/Aims: Bowel urgency is an important symptom for quality of life determination in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Few clinical studies have focused on bowel urgency as an efficacy endpoint. Budesonide foam enema has shown efficacy for clinical and endoscopic improvement in mild-to-moderate UC. We evaluated the improvement of clinical symptoms (bowel urgency), safety, and treatment impact of twice-daily budesonide foam enema on the quality of life in patients with UC. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, prospective observational study comprised a 4-week observation period assessing the effectiveness and safety of twice-daily budesonide foam enema. Mild-to-moderate UC patients who had bowel urgency were included. Patients collected data daily in an electronic patient-reported outcome system or logbooks. The primary endpoint was the rate of resolution of bowel urgency at the end of the 4-week observation period. The rate of bowel incontinence was also assessed. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. Of patients with a final evaluation, the rate of resolution of bowel urgency was 58.5% (31/53; 95% confidence interval, 44.1%–71.9%). Bowel urgency decreased over time, with a significant difference observed on day 7 versus day 0. Bowel incontinence showed a decreasing trend from day 5, with a significant difference confirmed on day 12 versus day 0. The clinical remission rate was 64.4% (38/59; 95% confidence interval, 50.9%–76.4%). One adverse event not related to budesonide rectal foam occurred. Conclusions The findings suggest that bowel urgency can be improved early with twice-daily budesonide foam enema. No new safety signals were observed.