1.Measurement and analysis of smile line of 62 Han-Chinese.
Xiu-lian HU ; Susanne HEBERER ; Katja NELSON ; Ye LIN
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2011;46(11):660-664
OBJECTIVETo analyze smile features in maximum lip-dynamic in Chinese.
METHODSSixty-two Han-Chinese, travelling in Germany, with a mean age of 28.5 years were enrolled and photographed. Standardized digital photos were made to measure the height of displayed maxillary gingiva, papilla and tooth during an enjoyment smile. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney-U Test and non-parametric analysis.
RESULTSThe mean height of tooth display for the central incisors was 10 mm, with no significant difference between the gender (P > 0.05). The mean height of gingival display was 1.3 mm and the mean papilla height was 3.4 mm. There was no significant difference between the genders (P > 0.05). 31% (19/62) of the subjects belonged to high smile line type, 50% (31/62) to medium smile line type and 19% (12/62) to low smile line type.
CONCLUSIONSThe red esthetics is a paramount factor for Chinese men and women in the esthetic restoration. 81% of the Chinese studied showed various degree of gingival exposure from central incisor to the premolars, which defined the esthetic area for Chinese people. Papilla is a critical parameter for esthetic evaluation and treatment design. The ratio of high smile line in Chinese may be higher than that in Caucasian.
Adult ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; ethnology ; Bicuspid ; anatomy & histology ; Cephalometry ; methods ; Dental Papilla ; anatomy & histology ; Esthetics, Dental ; Female ; Gingiva ; anatomy & histology ; Humans ; Incisor ; anatomy & histology ; Male ; Maxilla ; anatomy & histology ; Photography, Dental ; methods ; Smiling ; Young Adult
2.Retrospective long-term analysis of bone level changes after horizontal alveolar crest reconstruction with autologous bone grafts harvested from the posterior region of the mandible.
Jan Oliver VOSS ; Tobias DIEKE ; Christian DOLL ; Claudia SACHSE ; Katja NELSON ; Jan Dirk RAGUSE ; Susanne NAHLES
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2016;46(2):72-83
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term success of horizontal alveolar crest augmentation of the retromolar region of the mandible with particulated bone, as well as factors affecting subsequent peri-implant bone loss. METHODS: A total of 109 patients (68 female, 41 male) suffering from alveolar ridge deficiencies of the maxilla and mandible were included in this study. All patients were treated with particulated retromolar bone grafts from the mandible prior to the insertion of endosseous dental implants. Mesial and distal peri-implant crestal bone changes were assessed at six time points. Several parameters, including implant survival and the influence of age, gender, localisation of the implant, diameter, covering procedures, and time points of implant placement, were analysed to identify associations with bone level changes using the Mann-Whitney U-test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 164 dental implants were placed in the maxilla (n=97) and in the mandible (n=67). The mean observation period was 105.26±21.58 months after implantation. The overall survival rate was 97.6% after 10 years. Overall, peri-implant bone loss was highest during the first year, but decreased over time. The mean amount of bone loss after 10 years was 2.47 mm mesially and 2.50 mm distally. Bone loss was significantly influenced by implant type and primary stability. CONCLUSIONS: The use of particulated autologous retromolar bone grafts is a reliable technique for the horizontal reconstruction of local alveolar ridge deficiencies. Our results demonstrate that implants placed in augmented bone demonstrated similar bone level changes compared to implants inserted in non-augmented regions.
Alveolar Process
;
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
;
Autografts
;
Bone Resorption
;
Bone Transplantation
;
Dental Implants
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Mandible*
;
Maxilla
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Survival Rate
;
Transplants*