The surgical treatment of the rare extracranial carotid artery aneurysm can lead to significant thromboembolic events in 4.4% of cases. Intraoperative monitoring has helped detect hypoperfusion and probable ischemic events, but this is not widely available in resource-limited hospitals in the Philippines. This case highlights the use of a portable standard 21-channel EEG machine for intraoperative monitoring in a tertiary government hospital. In addition, it highlights a conception of a protocol for the intraoperative electroencephalogram monitoring of carotid endoaneurysmorrhaphy procedures in a resource-limited setting. During the aneurysmorrhaphy procedure, the authors collaborated with the surgeons and the anesthesiologists to provide feedback about EEG changes during the operation. After a pre-induction baseline was recorded, continuous EEG monitoring was performed until the patient emerged from anesthesia. Mild EEG changes, attributed to relative hypotension, were observed during the procedure. These episodes were responsive to BP augmentation. There were no EEG changes observed during carotid cross-clamping. Shunting was not recommended to the surgical team. No new neurologic deficits were documented postoperatively and on follow-up after six months. This paper illustrates how an intraoperative team was formed, and intraoperative EEG was utilized for a complex carotid endoaneurysmorrhaphy for a patient with ECAA in a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines.

Human ; Resource-limited Settings ; Carotid Arteries ; Philippines

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines for the management of asthma have advocated the use of a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer in the delivery of salbutamol. However, there is a dearth of research in children with severe exacerbation. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of MDI with spacers versus nebulizers in drug delivery of salbutamol for the management of pediatric severe asthma exacerbations. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search of the Pubmed, Cochrane library, Herdin, WPRIM, ClinicalTrials and reference review databases was conducted for studies containing “severe asthma” using MDI and spacer as an intervention with nebulization as a comparator. RESULTS: Of 220 articles, 4 met the criteria. In the subgroup analysis, children who received salbutamol through MDI showed no significant difference in hospital admission, pulmonary score, heart and respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and lung function. CONCLUSION: In severe asthma exacerbations, there is evidence to support that MDI compared with nebulizer is statistically equal in terms of hospital admission, pulmonary scores, clinical improvement, and side effects RECOMMENDATIONS Further randomized controlled trials are suggested to explore the intricacies of drug delivery in management of severe asthma. A meta-analysis may be made possible in the future with more evidence.