1.Assessing amblyogenic factors in 100 patients with congenital ptosis
Kasaee ABOLFAZL ; Yazdani-Abyaneh ALIREZA ; Tabatabaie Ziaeddin SYED ; K.Jafari ALIREZA ; Ameri, AHMAD ; Eshraghi BAHRAM ; Samarai VAFA ; Mireshghi MEYSAM ; Rajabi Taher MOHAMMAD
International Eye Science 2011;11(3):390-393
AIM: To study the frequency of amblyogenic factors in patients with congenital ptosis.congenital ptosis more than 1 year old were included. Amblyopia was defined as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) less than 10/10 or a difference between the two eyes of at least 2/10. In patients too young to be measured by the linear Snellen E test, fixation behavior was observed. Different types of amblyopia were assessed for each patient as: 1) anisometropic amblyopia: astigmatic anisometropia≥ 1dpt, hyperopic spherical anisometropia≥ 1dpt, myopic spherical anisometropia≥ -3dpt (with cycloplegia);2) strabismic amblyopia, and 3) stimulus deprivation amblyopia (SDA). Then the total incidence of amblyopia and each type of it were obtained. Patients with uni-and bi-lateral ptosis were also compared. Each specific cause was refractive amblyopia in 29.8%, SDA in 10.5%, strabismic amblyopia in 4.3%. Amblyopia was more frequent in severe ptosis, 76% in patients with covered optical axes (OA), compared to non-covered OA (22.5%). In unilateral ptosis with covered OA, astigmatic anisometropic amblyopia was more frequent, and in bilateral ptosis with at least one eye covered OA, spherical anisometropic amblyopia was more frequent. In both unilateral and bilateral ptosis, SDA was more common if the OA was covered. Paying attention to all causes of amblyopia may be important in preventing amblyopia in a child with a ptotic eye.
2.Orbital Exenteration: A 23-year Report
Abolfazl KASAEE ; Bahram ESHRAGHI ; Shahbaz NEKOOZADEH ; Kambiz AMELI ; Motahareh SADEGHI ; Mansooreh JAMSHIDIAN-TEHRANI
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2019;33(4):366-370
PURPOSE: Orbital exenteration is a psychologically and anatomically disfiguring procedure which indicated in some patients with malignant or progressive diseases of orbital and periorbital area. In this study, we reviewed 176 patients that underwent orbital exenteration. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of medical records from all patients who underwent orbital exenteration from March 1991 to March 2014 in oculoplastic department at an eye care center. Demographic data, diagnosis, site of primary involvement and technique of surgery were determined in patients. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six cases of orbital exenteration were included that had documented histopathology. The age of patients ranged from 1 to 91 years (mean age ± standard deviation, 55.43 ± 27 years). Ninety-seven (55.11%) males and 79 (44.88%) females were included. Fifteen different tumors were identified. The most common indication was patients with basal cell carcinoma 49 (28%) followed by 41 (23.5%) squamous cell carcinomas, 35 (20%) retinoblastoma, and 13 (7%) adenoid cystic carcinomas. In total, adnexal malignancies were the most common tumors, secondarily involving the orbit. Eyelids 89 (50.5%) and the globe 43 (24%) were the most frequent site of involvement. Three types of exenteration were performed, based on available data of 129 operation sheets, 46 (35.7%) subtotal, 62 (48.1%) total, and 21 (16.3%) cases of extensive exenterations. In total 97 cases were evaluated pathologically for perineural involvement, of which perineural invasion was noted in 9 (7%) reports. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency of exenteration in our center has increased in past 3 years and the majority of cases were eyelid basal cell carcinoma. Patient education considering periocular lesions can help in earlier diagnosis of malignant lesions and therefore reducing the number of exenteration.
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic
;
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
;
Diagnosis
;
Eyelids
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Medical Records
;
Orbit
;
Patient Education as Topic
;
Retinoblastoma
;
Retrospective Studies