1.Lower SMI is a risk factor for dysphagia in Japanese hospitalized patients with osteoporotic vertebral and hip fracture: A retrospective study
Kaoru SUSEKI ; Masaomi YAMASHITA ; Yoshiaki KOJIMA ; Yojiro MINEGISHI ; Koichiro KOMIYA ; Masashi TAKASO
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2022;8(4):152-157
Objectives:
Many patients with osteoporotic fragile fracture often suffer from dysphagia that results in malnutrition, further deterioration of physical strength, and rehabilitation difficulties. This study aims to investigate the risk factors for dysphagia in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic vertebral and/or hip fractures.
Methods:
Between January 2020 and December 2021, 569 inpatients were managed for osteoporotic vertebral or hip fractures. Of these, 503 patients were analyzed and 66 were excluded as the required data could not be obtained or dysphagia with causative diseases such as cerebrovascular disease. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with dysphagia (P-group) and patients without dysphagia (N-group). We investigated gender, fracture site, age, systemic skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI) in early stage of hospitalization and studied their relationship with dysphagia.
Results:
There were no significant differences in gender and fracture site between the 2 groups. A significant difference was observed in age, SMI, BMD, and BMI (P < 0.01). We performed a logistic regression analysis with the P-group as the objective variable and age, SMI, BMD, and BMI as explanatory variables. We divided objective groups into all patients, patients with vertebral fracture, patients with hip fracture, men, and women. SMI was an independent risk factor in all groups.
Conclusions
Lower SMI was a risk factor for dysphagia in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic vertebral and hip fractures. We carefully observed swallowing function of patients with decreased SMI to maintain the nutritional status and prevent rehabilitation difficulties.
2.Correlation Between Walking Ability and Monthly Care Costs in Elderly Patients After Surgical Treatments for Hip Fractures.
Koki ABE ; Kazuhide INAGE ; Keishi YAMASHITA ; Masaomi YAMASHITA ; Akiyoshi YAMAMAOKA ; Masaki NORIMOTO ; Yoshinori NAKATA ; Takeshi MITSUKA ; Kaoru SUSEKI ; Sumihisa ORITA ; Kazuki FUJIMOTO ; Yasuhiro SHIGA ; Hirohito KANAMOTO ; Masahiro INOUE ; Hideyuki KINOSHITA ; Tomotaka UMIMURA ; Yawara EGUCHI ; Takeo FURUYA ; Kazuhisa TAKAHASHI ; Seiji OHTORI
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2018;42(4):569-574
OBJECTIVE: To validate the relationship between residual walking ability and monthly care cost as well as long-term care insurance (LTCI) certification level in elderly patients after surgical treatment for hip fractures in Japan. METHODS: Elderly patients aged >75 years who underwent surgical treatment for hip fractures in our hospital were included. The preand post-surgical (6-month) walking ability and LTCI certification and the presence or absence of dementia was determined from medical records and questionnaires. Walking ability was classified into 6 levels used in our daily medical practice. Based on these data, we correlated the relationship between walking ability and the LTCI certification level. Further, based on the official statistics pertaining to the average monthly costs per person at each LTCI certification level, we evaluated the relationship between walking ability and monthly care cost. RESULTS: A total of 105 cases (mean age, 80.2 years; 16 men; 39 patients with dementia) were included. The correlation between walking ability and average monthly cost per person as well as LTCI certification level at 6 months postoperatively (r=0.58) was demonstrated. The correlation was found in both groups with and without dementia. CONCLUSION: The ability to walk reduced the cost of care in elderly patients who experienced hip fracture, regardless of the presence of dementia.
Aged*
;
Certification
;
Cost-Benefit Analysis
;
Dementia
;
Hip Fractures*
;
Hip*
;
Humans
;
Insurance, Long-Term Care
;
Japan
;
Long-Term Care
;
Male
;
Medical Records
;
Mobility Limitation
;
Walking*