Objectives: In alignment with the World Health Organization’s goal of eliminating hepatitis C, this study assessed the current treatment status and reasons for non-treatment among patients with hepatitis C in Jeonbuk State, Republic of Korea, to inform strategies for improving care engagement. Methods: Among 311 individuals diagnosed with hepatitis C and reported through the NationalNotifiable Infectious Disease Surveillance system between January 2023 and June 2024, 208 patients were surveyed after excluding those who had died or could not be contacted.Statistical analyses included the chi-square test, the Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and logistic regression. Results: Overall, 116 participants (55.8%) reported having received antiviral therapy. Among the 92 untreated individuals, the most common reason for non-treatment was the absence of symptoms (n = 23; 25.0%), followed by the burden of drug costs (n = 21; 22.8%). Conclusion These findings highlight suboptimal treatment uptake and key barriers that may hinder progress toward hepatitis C elimination. Expanding screening and strengthening linkage-to-care strategies, while addressing financial barriers, will be essential to achievingnational elimination targets.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic anti-reflux therapy is a therapeutic option for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), providing durable effects. However, clinical data from Korea remain limited. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of endoscopic radiofrequency Stretta therapy in Korean patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 patients with GERD who underwent Stretta therapy at 2 tertiary hospitals in Korea between November 2015 and July 2021. Clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction, medication cessation or reduction, and complications, were evaluated. Pre- and post-procedural esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring test results were also analyzed. Results: Patient satisfaction rates at 1, 6, and 12 months post-procedure were 54.7% (35/64), 70.0% (28/40), and 75.0% (21/28), respectively. Medication cessation or reduction was achieved in 31.2% (20/64) at 1 month, 70.0% (28/40) at 6 months, and 67.9% (19/28) at 12 months. Esophageal manometry (n = 21) showed no significant changes in mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (18.7 mmHg [2.5-52.9] vs 17.4 mmHg [0.0-43.0], P = 0.702) or mean integrated relaxation pressure (8.2 mmHg [0.0-28.0] vs 10.1 mmHg [0.0-31.0], P = 0.840). The 24-hour pH monitoring (n = 18) demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in acid exposure time (pH < 4) from 2.3% (0.0-8.4) to 1.6% (0.0-7.3) (P = 0.182). Similarly, the DeMeester score decreased non-significantly from 8.4 (0.8-27.7) to 6.6 (0.8-21.8) (P = 0.352). No procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion Endoscopic radiofrequency Stretta therapy appears to be a safe treatment option for GERD and may provide favorable patient satisfaction and medication reduction.

Legal risks and liability issues in medical practice serve as a primary catalyst for the current collapse of essential healthcare services in Korea. Currently, medical disputes in Korea are disproportionately focused on criminal prosecutions and high-damages civil litigation. This punitive approach fosters a culture of concealment, encourages defensive medicine, and accelerates the exodus of medical professionals from essential fields. Ultimately, this cycle deprives the system of opportunities for improvement and poses a significant threat to patient safety. In contrast, many advanced nations have adopted principles of “Just Culture” and “Safe Space,” prioritizing non-punitive reporting and systemic root-cause analysis over individual retribution. To address these issues, this paper proposes four key strategies: First, the establishment of an independent “Patient Safety Investigation Agency” to objectively investigate incidents and identify systemic flaws. Second, a transition from criminal punishment to licensing board-led management, focusing on re-education and counseling to maintain quality of care. Third, the enactment of “Apology Laws” to ensure that expressions of regret or apologies cannot be used as legal evidence of liability, thereby fostering trust and psychological recovery. Finally, the creation of a “Patient Safety Fund” to provide prompt and sufficient public compensation to victims regardless of proven negligence. In conclusion, it is imperative to shift the paradigm by defining medical accidents as “system failures” rather than individual faults. Strengthening the social safety net will encourage medical professionals to return to essential care and build a sustainable healthcare environment centered on patient safety.

The South Korean healthcare system has achieved rapid quantitative growth; however, it continues to face critical challenges in ensuring the fundamental right to health of its citizens. From the perspective of healthcare consumers and civil society, this article identifies structural problems such as imbalances in medical accessibility, instability in essential and emergency care, and the limited participation of consumers in healthcare policy-making. Although the constitution stipulates the state’s responsibility to protect public health, current healthcare policies often prioritize administrative efficiency and provider-centered interests over patient experiences and health outcomes. In particular, this article argues that these challenges are closely related to the inadequate functioning of an accountable healthcare management framework. Structural failures in essential care, workforce shortages, and regional disparities are insufficiently monitored and addressed at the system level, resulting in responsibilities being blurred or shifted to individual healthcare providers. Consequently, the risks and burdens arising from systemic weaknesses are ultimately borne by citizens. To address these issues, this article emphasizes two major shifts. First, meaningful consumer participation must be institutionalized within healthcare governance to strengthen accountability, transparency, and responsiveness. Second, family medicine and primary care should be reinforced as the cornerstone of a sustainable, community-based healthcare system that ensures continuity of care, prevention, and chronic disease management. Re-establishing the healthcare system based on the right to health is not merely a technical adjustment, but a structural transformation toward a responsible and accountable system in which the state clearly assumes responsibility for monitoring, learning, and corrective action.

While South Korea’s National Health Insurance (NHI) was once disparaged as a rudimentary “discount program,” it has matured into the cornerstone of the nation’s medical safety net owing to sustained governmental initiatives. Nevertheless, the pursuit of expanded benefit coverage, exacerbated by demographic shifts toward low fertility and an aging society, has catalyzed a rapid escalation in aggregate national healthcare spending.Consequently, there is an urgent need for the NHI to implement benefit expansion policies that prioritize cost-efficiency and fiscal prudence. This perspective asserts that coverage enhancement should be strategically focused on high-cost catastrophic illnesses, specifically through the robust fortification of the annual out-of-pocket (OOP) maximum system. Furthermore, the reform of private health insurance is imperative, as its unbridled growth in non-reimbursable services has undermined the efficacy of public coverage efforts. This paper proposes concrete policy frameworks for both the enhancement of the OOP maximum system and the structural reform of private indemnity health insurance.

Recurrent difficulty securing emergency department (ED) acceptance and delayed interfacility transfer, often resulting in multiple sequential transfer attempts (“round-robin” hospital seeking), in the Republic of Korea reflect a patient safety failure across the emergency care continuum, spanning Emergency Medical Services from emergency calls and prehospital care to ED stabilization, definitive treatment, and secondary transfer. We argue that the governance split between the National Fire Agency–led prehospital response and the Ministry of Health and Welfare–led emergency medical system fragments accountability and data, undermining sustainable quality management. We describe a “double bind” in which clinicians face medico-legal risk regardless of acceptance decisions, distorting transfer behavior. We propose an outcome-linked Quality Improvement system—integrated metrics, interoperable data linkage, operational medical control, and routine feedback—to strengthen Continuity of Patient Care. This requires functional integration of the dual command structure; transferring ambulance service functions to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, or an equivalently strong joint-governance model, should be evaluated. Regionally, responsibility-based systems should be implemented through councils that set transfer principles and resource allocation, supported by stable financing and performance review, with the regional emergency medical situation room providing medical control and real-time coordination. For mass-casualty incidents, preparedness should align standardized triage, integrated command and communication, training, and after-action review. Legal reform is a necessary starting point, but trust and sustained patient safety depend more on cultivating a learning-oriented safety culture grounded in patient experience and public deliberation throughout policy design and implementation.

South Korea’s current healthcare system stands at a critical crossroads that will determine whether it can progress in a better direction over the next decade. Behind the relatively stable level of population health that has been maintained until now, it has become clear that the deterioration of patient experiences, the risk of collapse in critical emergency medical services, the burnout of healthcare providers, and the crisis in the sustainability of healthcare finances have all accumulated simultaneously. This crisis can no longer be overcome by partial fixes or short-term measures alone. The answer to what needs to change first must begin with a reaffirmation of what the healthcare system should aim for. Ultimately, what needs to be changed now is not an individual policy, but the criteria and priorities through which we view healthcare. The focus must shift from what to provide more of, to questioning what holds greater social value. If such a shift does not begin now, in ten years we won’t face a better healthcare system, but care enmeshed in a deeper crisis. Now is precisely the time to fundamentally define the direction of the healthcare system.

Purpose: A proportion of patients who undergo kidney transplantation (KT) eventually experience graft failure and require dialysis. However, the characteristics of posttransplant patients differ from non-KT patients considering the long-term use of immunosuppressants, steroids, and associated complications. These differences may influence the outcomes of vascular access (VA). This study aims to compare the VA outcomes and infection rates between KT with allograft failures and non-KT patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent VA creation between January 2018 and November 2023.A propensity score-matched cohort was created based on age and sex, comparing 61 patients who received their first VA creation after KT to 222 patients who had never undergone KT before VA creation. Results: The median VA patency was 841 days. VA abandonment within 3 months occurred in 3.2% in the non-KT group and 1.6% in the KT with failed allograft group (P = 0.845). Infection rates were also similar (4.1% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.226). Cox regression indicated that KT was not a significant risk factor for VA patency, whereas low body mass index and diabetes mellitus were significant risk factors for long-term patency. In the KT group, steroid and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor use before VA formation were identified as risk factors for primary patency. Conclusion VA outcomes in KT patients with allograft failure were comparable to those of non-KT patients. While KT status itself does not adversely affect VA patency or infection rates, patients with low body mass index, diabetes mellitus, or who are receiving steroid or mTOR inhibitors should be carefully managed.

Congenital longitudinal cleft earlobes (CLCEs) present a ginkgo leaf–shaped malformation with combined skin and soft-tissue deficiency along the inferior margin. No previous method has addressed both deficiencies while preserving earlobe length and contour. We introduce a simple, single-field procedure that combines a large, single Z-plasty for complete skin preservation with dermofat grafting for volumetric restoration. A Z-plasty was designed on the cleft-side skin, with the central limb placed along the cleft valley and the opposing limbs aligned with the anterior and posterior ridges of both lobules. After elevating both triangular flaps and fully releasing the contracted fibrotic tissue at the cleft base, a compact, dense dermofat graft harvested from the ipsilateral mastoid area was inserted into the inferior marginal defect and anchored to prevent superior migration. The Z-plasty flaps were then transposed and closed without skin sacrifice. Postoperatively, the superior portion of the earlobe was compressed to prevent graft displacement. At 16–32 months of follow-up, all reconstructed earlobes maintained stable volume and natural contour without horizontal or vertical shortening. This combined technique provides a reliable, tissue-preserving, and cosmetically favorable option for correcting CLCEs, effectively resolving both skin and soft-tissue deficiencies within a single operative field.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of primary bone restoration with transnasal balloon-assisted support for inferior orbital wall fractures and compared it with the efficacy of conventional alloplastic reconstruction. Methods: A total of 85 patients were included in this study. Of them, 25 underwent transconjunctival reconstruction with alloplastic implants (Group A), whereas the remaining 60 underwent primary bone reduction with transnasal balloon-assisted support (Group B). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on Hertel exophthalmometry, the orbital volume ratio (OVR) calculated from 6-month follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans, and a curvature analysis of the posterior orbital floor contour on sagittal CT images. Results: Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in OVR (from 109.23% to 103.07% in Group A; from 111.17% to 103.27% in Group B; p< 0.001). The mean change in the Hertel scale was –0.20 mm in Group A and –0.43 mm in Group B, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the magnitude of volume reduction between Groups A (6.16%) and B (7.90%; p= 0.296). Curvature analysis demonstrated a significantly smaller absolute curvature difference between the operated and contralateral sides in Group B than in Group A (0.0136 vs. 0.0310; p< 0.001). Conclusion Transnasal balloon-assisted primary bone restoration represents a reliable surgical alternative, facilitating the reconstruction of natural orbital floor contours while minimizing complications associated with conventional alloplastic implants.