Objective To explore the outcomes and prognostic effects of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and evalue the N staging.Methods Participants comprised 1145 patients with ESCC from Jan.2004 to Dec.2013,who under-went Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.The clinicopathologic data were analyzed.Kaplan -Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival analysis.Results The morbidity of postoperative complication was 9.15% and with 1.83% of motality.The 1 -,3 - and 5 -year survival rates were 84.2%,58.4%,47.9% respectively.The median survival time was 55 months and average survival time was (70.16 ±2.086)months.Cox model multivariate analysis was used for those of P <0.05 in single variate analysis.Univariate analysis revealed that gender(P =0.003),smoking history (P =0.013),alcohol history(P =0.017),tumor location(P =0.001),body mass index(P =0.008),tumor length (P =0.000),differentiation degree(P =0.000),numbers of metastic zones(P =0.000)of lymph node metastasis (P =0.000),depth of invasion (P =0.000),pathological staging(P =0.000),vascular tumor thrombus (P =0.000),nerve involvement(P =0.000)and postoperative adjuvant therapy(P =0.000)were influencing prognosis factors.And multivariate analysis revealed that differentiation degree(P =0.000),depth of invasion(P =0.000), numbers of metastic zones (P =0.013 )of lymph node metastasis (P =0.000)were independent risk factors. Conclusion Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was a safe and effective treatment,and tumor differentiation degree,depth of invasion,numbers and zones of lymph node metastasis were important prognostic factors.

Objective:To analyze the consistency and correlation between the Chinese Version of Swanson Nolan and Pelham, Version Ⅳ Scale (SNAP-Ⅳ) and the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-CPT) in the assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), thus providing a reliable basis for the diagnosis of ADHD, and reducing the misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate.Methods:Clinical data of children to be diagnosed as ADHD in the Department of Children′s Rehabilitation, Yuying Children′s Hospital of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from October 2019 to July 2020 were collected.A total of 282 SNAP-Ⅳ and IVA-CPT profiles were collected, and the Kappa test and Pearson test were used to retrospectively analyzed for their consistency and correlation in the diagnosis of ADHD. Results:SNAP-Ⅳ and IVA-CPT were consistent in the diagnosis of ADHD (Kappa value=0.514, total coincidence rate=65.6%, P<0.000 1). Inattention subset scores of SNAP-Ⅳ were consistent with the assessment of ADHD by IVA-CPT (Kappa value=0.485, total coincidence rate=75.5%, P<0.000 1). Inattention subset scores of SNAP-Ⅳ were negatively correlated with the Full Scale Attention Quotient (FAQ) in IVA-CPT ( r=-0.71, P<0.000 1). Hyperactivity-impulsive subscale in the SNAP-Ⅳ and IVA-CPT were consistent in the assessment of hyperactivity-impulsive behavior (Kappa value=0.585, total coincidence rate=81.6%, P<0.000 1). Hyperactivity-impulse subset scores were negatively correlated with the Full Scale Response Control Quotient (FRCQ) in IVA-CPT ( r=-0.74, P<0.000 1). Conclusions:Both SNAP-Ⅳ and IVA-CPT have certain diagnostic potential of ADHD, showing good consistency and correlation.They can be both used to provide a more comprehensive diagnosis basis, thereby reducing the misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate of ADHD.