1.Radiological protection assessment of a hospital Clinac 23EX medical electron accelerator construction project
Zhixin ZHAO ; Hezheng ZHAI ; Wenyi ZHANG ; Jie GAO ; Quan WU ; Shuzhou RUAN ; Kaijun SU ; Ling JIAO
International Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2017;40(3):173-176
Objective To evaluate the radiation protection of occupational hazards in a hospital Clinac 23EX medical electronic accelerator construction project so as to ensure the health and safety of the relevant people involved.Methods According to the relevant laws,regulations and standards of China,combined with the relevant materials provided by the construction unit,the radiation protection tests and comprehensive assessment of this project were carried out.Results The performance test results of the medical electron accelerator met the requinements of GB/T 19046-2013 The ambient dose equivalent rate in the workplace was between the background dose rate (0.10 μ,Sv/h) and 11.5 μSv/h,which suggested the computer room shielding met the requirements of radiation protection.The total body effective dose,the for 7 radiation workers were 0.85,1.19,1.64 mSv,respectively,which were lower than the dose management control values of the construction unit and the national standards.Radiation protection supplies and the management system of the construction unit met the national requirements.Conclusions The construction project can effectively control the radioactive occupational hazard factors in normal operation,and the radiation protection facilities have reached the completion requirements.
2.Effect of high dose irradiation on thermoluminescence detector
Shuzhou RUAN ; Zhixin ZHAO ; Wenyi ZHANG ; Kaijun SU ; Xinxin PANG ; Fang WANG ; Yulian LIU ; Menghui HUO ; Changxin YAN ; Ling JIAO
International Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2019;42(4):342-345
Objective To investigate effect of high dose irradiation on the performances of thermolumines-cence detectors (LiF:Mg, Cu, P). Methods The high-dose irradiated thermoluminescence detector was annealed by a thermoluminescence annealing furnace until the annealing was completed, and then the annealed thermoluminescent detector was irradiated 0.5Gy by 137Cs irradiator to verify the accuracy of the thermoluminescentdetector. Results The thermoluminescence detector after high-dose irradiation could not be completely annealed under the temperature condition of 240 ℃, and it could be completely annealed at a high temperature as 400℃. After 0.5 Gy irradiation by 137Cs irradiator, the measurement results of the annealed thermoluminescence detector were significantly smaller, and the dose response and dispersion of the detector were also changed significantly. Conclusions After a more than 5 Gy irradiation, the crystal structure of the thermoluminescence detector has changed, and a high temperature peak above 240 ℃ has appeared, which leads to the failure to completely anneal at normal temperature. Therefore, the thermoluminescence detector can no longer be used for dosimetry after high-dose irradiation.
3.Research progress in measurement methods for210Po and 210Pb in environmental samples
Kaijun SU ; Xilong WANG ; Menghui HUO ; Wei DONG ; Hezheng ZHAI ; Ling JIAO
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health 2022;31(2):245-249
210Po and 210Pb exist widely in nature, and they have strong toxicity and strong ionization ability, which can cause continuous harm to human health. Therefore, it is of great significance to determine the activity concentrations of 210Po and 210Pb in environmental samples and to evaluate their harmful effects on human health. This article reviews the research progress in analytical methods and measurement techniques of 210Po and 210Pb in environmental samples.
4.Results and analysis of intercomparison in the 2019—2021 national personal dose monitoring
Hezheng ZHAI ; Quan WU ; Xiangjun WU ; Manyao WANG ; Qi ZHANG ; Wei ZHOU ; Kaijun SU ; Pengyue ZHOU ; Wenyi ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health 2023;32(2):102-107
Objective To analyze the process of intercomparison of national personal dose monitoring, evaluate the ability of personal dose monitoring, and ensure the accuracy and reliability of monitoring results in our laboratory. Methods In accordance with the intercomparison protocol for 2019—2021, an energy-discriminant thermoluminescence dosimeter was used for measurement at different doses. The uncertainty of measurement was evaluated and compared with the reference value. Results Hp(10) was measured for intercomparison in 2019—2021. In 2019, the single group performance difference was −0.02 to 0.02 and the comprehensive performance was 0.02. These values were 0.02-0.10 and 0.05 in 2020, and −0.02 to 0.02 and 0.01 in 2021. The intercomparison results were rated as excellent in the three consecutive years. Conclusion The personal dose monitoring system in our laboratory was in good condition, and the monitoring results were accurate and reliable. Improving the knowledge of personnel and cultivating a serious working attitude are important for intercomparison and personal dose monitoring.