1.Collateral Flow in Magnetic Resonance Angiography:Prognostic Value for Vertebrobasilar Stenosis With Stroke Recurrence
Long YAN ; Ying YU ; Kaijiang KANG ; Zhikai HOU ; Min WAN ; Weilun FU ; Rongrong CUI ; Yongjun WANG ; Zhongrong MIAO ; Xin LOU ; Ning MA
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2022;18(5):507-513
Background:
and Purpose Intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis (IVBAS) is a major cause of posterior circulation stroke. Some patients suffer from stroke recurrence despite receiving medical treatment. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of a new score for the posterior communicating artery and the P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery (PCoA-P1) for predicting stroke recurrence in IVBAS.
Methods:
We retrospectively enrolled patients with severe IVBAS (70%–99%). According to the number of stroke recurrences, patients were divided into no-recurrence, single-recurrence, and multiple-recurrences groups. We developed a new 5-point grading scale, with the PCoA-P1 score ranging from 0 to 4 based on magnetic resonance angiography, in which primary collaterals were dichotomized into good (2–4 points) and poor (0 or 1 point). Stroke recurrences after the index stroke were recorded. Patients who did not experience stroke recurrence were compared with those who experienced single or multiple stroke recurrences.
Results:
From January 2012 to December 2019, 176 patients were enrolled, of which 116 (65.9%) had no stroke recurrence, 35 (19.9%) had a single stroke recurrence, and 25 (14.2%) had multiple stroke recurrences. Patients with single stroke recurrence (odds ratio [OR]= 4.134, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.822–9.380, p=0.001) and multiple stroke recurrences (OR=6.894, 95% CI=2.489–19.092, p<0.001) were more likely to have poor primary collaterals than those with no stroke recurrence.
Conclusions
The new PCoA-P1 score appears to provide improve predictions of stroke recurrence in patients with IVBAS.
2.Technical specification for clinical application of critical ultrasonography
Wanhong YIN ; Xiaoting WANG ; Dawei LIU ; Yangong CHAO ; Xiangdong GUAN ; Yan KANG ; Jing YAN ; Xiaochun MA ; Yaoqing TANG ; Zhenjie HU ; Kaijiang YU ; Dechang CHEN ; Yuhang AI ; Lina ZHANG ; Hongmin ZHANG ; Jun WU ; Lixia LIU ; Ran ZHU ; Wei HE ; Qing ZHANG ; Xin DING ; Li LI ; Yi LI ; Haitao LIU ; Qinbing ZENG ; Xiang SI ; Huan CHEN ; Junwei ZHANG ; Qianghong XU ; Wenjin CHEN ; Xiukai CHEN ; Daozheng HUANG ; Shuhan CAI ; Xiuling SHANG ; Jian GUAN ; Juan DU ; Li ZHAO ; Minjia WANG ; Song CUI ; Xiaomeng WANG ; Ran ZHOU ; Xueying ZENG ; Yiping WANG ; Liwen LYU ; Weihua ZHU ; Ying ZHU ; Jun DUAN ; Jing YANG ; Hao YANG ; Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group ; Gritical Hemodynamic Therapy Collabration Group
Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine 2018;57(6):397-417
Critical ultrasonography(CUS) is different from the traditional diagnostic ultrasound,the examiner and interpreter of the image are critical care medicine physicians.The core content of CUS is to evaluate the pathophysiological changes of organs and systems and etiology changes.With the idea of critical care medicine as the soul,it can integrate the above information and clinical information,bedside real-time diagnosis and titration treatment,and evaluate the therapeutic effect so as to improve the outcome.CUS is a traditional technique which is applied as a new application method.The consensus of experts on critical ultrasonography in China released in 2016 put forward consensus suggestions on the concept,implementation and application of CUS.It should be further emphasized that the accurate and objective assessment and implementation of CUS requires the standardization of ultrasound image acquisition and the need to establish a CUS procedure.At the same time,the standardized training for CUS accepted by critical care medicine physicians requires the application of technical specifications,and the establishment of technical specifications is the basis for the quality control and continuous improvement of CUS.Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group and Critical Hemodynamic Therapy Collabration Group,based on the rich experience of clinical practice in critical care and research,combined with the essence of CUS,to learn the traditional ultrasonic essence,established the clinical application technical specifications of CUS,including in five parts:basic view and relevant indicators to obtain in CUS;basic norms for viscera organ assessment and special assessment;standardized processes and systematic inspection programs;examples of CUS applications;CUS training and the application of qualification certification.The establishment of applied technology standard is helpful for standardized training and clinical correct implementation.It is helpful for clinical evaluation and correct guidance treatment,and is also helpful for quality control and continuous improvement of CUS application.
3.Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019.
You SHANG ; Jianfeng WU ; Jinglun LIU ; Yun LONG ; Jianfeng XIE ; Dong ZHANG ; Bo HU ; Yuan ZONG ; Xuelian LIAO ; Xiuling SHANG ; Renyu DING ; Kai KANG ; Jiao LIU ; Aijun PAN ; Yonghao XU ; Changsong WANG ; Qianghong XU ; Xijing ZHANG ; Jicheng ZHANG ; Ling LIU ; Jiancheng ZHANG ; Yi YANG ; Kaijiang YU ; Xiangdong GUAN ; Dechang CHEN
Chinese Medical Journal 2022;135(16):1913-1916
Humans
;
COVID-19
;
Consensus
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
China