1.Long-term Efficacy of Dacryoendoscopy-guided Recanalization and Silicone Tube Intubation
Sung Eun KIM ; Jin Uk BEAK ; Ji-Sun PAIK ; Juwan PARK ; Suk-Woo YANG
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2022;36(3):185-193
Purpose:
To investigate the long-term efficacy of dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation in patients with obstruction in the lacrimal drainage system and to identify factors related to surgical outcome.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and canalicular obstruction who underwent dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation between August 2014 and March 2016. Factors related to surgical outcome were examined and compared between the success group (eyes with complete response and partial response) and the failure group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the success rate according to the factors found to have statistical significance.
Results:
The study included 74 eyes of 51 patients. The mean age of the patients was 60.3 ± 10.0 years (range, 34–80 years). The success group consisted of 66 eyes (89.2%) (complete response, 56 eyes, 75.7%; partial response, 10 eyes, 13.5%) and the failure group consisted of eight eyes (10.8%). The median follow-up period was 58 months (range, 6.5–72 months), and the overall success rate was 89.2%. Compared to the eyes with preoperative lacrimal irrigation test of partial passage, the eyes with no passage were associated with a lower success rate (95.9% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.01). Postoperative inflammation was also associated with a lower success rate (96.6% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation is effective and can be considered a first choice of treatment for eyes which show partial passage in the lacrimal irrigation test. The management of postoperative inflammation is essential to ensure surgical success.
2.Hinge Fracture during Cervical Open-door Laminoplasty: Does it Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes?.
Sung Hoon CHO ; Jung Hwan LEE ; Chung Kee CHOUGH ; Won Il JOO ; Hae Kwan PARK ; Kyung Jin LEE ; Hyoung Kyun RHA
Korean Journal of Spine 2014;11(2):45-51
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the status of the hinge gutter affected clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical open door laminoplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients who had undergone cervical open door laminoplasty. 23 CT scans were performed at 2 days post-operation. The number of CT scans at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were 16, 12, 21 and 11, respectively. We collected perioperative and follow-up data, including clinical and radiographic results. RESULTS: There were 7 patients without a hinge fracture and 16 patients with one or more hinge fractures at 2 days postoperation. There were 90 hinges, and the rate of ideal greenstick deformation of the hinge was 63% on 2-day-postoperative CT scans. Postoperative VAS scores of neck pain (p=0.012) in patients without a hinge fracture were higher than in patients with hinge fractures. The hinge healing rates were 37% at 3 months, 57.4% at 6 months, 86.4% at 12 months, and 85.4% at 24 months. Among the patients, 14 patients had healed hinges, and 7 patients had one or more hinge(s) that was/were not healed at 12 months post-operation. However, in clinical and radiographic outcomes, there was no difference between these patients. CONCLUSION: Cervical open door laminoplasty was safe and provided stable reconstruction of laminar expansion. In radiographs, the difference between hinges that had healed and hinges that had not healed was statistically negligible. Hinge fractures might not influence the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical open door laminoplasty.
Cervical Vertebrae
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Neck Pain
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Treatment Outcome
3.Two Cases of Endogenous Endophthalmitis That Progressed to Globe Rupture.
Tai Kyong KIM ; Ji Hyun LEE ; Jiwon BAEK ; Ji Sun PAIK ; Juwan PARK ; Mee Yon LEE
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2017;31(3):279-281
No abstract available.
Endophthalmitis*
;
Rupture*