1.Clinicopathological analysis of 61 patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Xiaojun WU ; Wu JIANG ; Rongxin ZHANG ; Peirong DING ; Gong CHEN ; Zhenhai LU ; Liren LI ; Yujing FANG ; Fulong WANG ; Lingheng KONG ; Junzhong LIN ; Zhizhong PAN ; Desen WAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(4):335-339
OBJECTIVETo explore the clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy, and prognostic factors for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST).
METHODSClinicopathological and follow-up data of 61 patients with rectal GIST in our department from January 1990 to October 2012 were analyzed retrospectively and pathology specimens were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate the influencing factors of prognosis with Log-rank test and Cox regression model.
RESULTSThere were 42 male and 19 female patients with a median age of 59 years old. Eighteen cases(29.5%) were confirmed preoperatively as GIST by biopsy and 46 cases were diagnosed as GIST by first pathological examination. Fifteen cases(24.6%) were revised as GIST after re-examination of specimes among whom 14 cases had been diagnosed as leiomyoma or sarcoma, and 1 as neurolemmoma. Tumor location was above peritoneal reflection in 12 cases(19.7%) and below peritoneal reflection in 49(80.3%). Fifty-two patients underwent surgery, including 21 extended resections(lymph nodes clearance and combined organs resection simultaneously) and 31 local resections(tumor rejection or partial resection of rectal wall). Eleven patients received preoperative imatinib(400 mg/d). Forty-one cases received imatinib therapy after operation or biopsy diagnosis, including 25 cases who received palliative treatment for postoperative recurrence. Median follow-up time was 55(6 to 391) months and follow-up longer than 2 years was carried out in 46 patients. Overall survival rates of 1-, 2-, 3- , 5-year were 98%, 95.6%, 86.0% and 73.7% respectively. There were no significant differences between local resection group(96.4%, 92%, 83.3% and 77.3%) and extended resection group (100%, 94.7%, 89.50% and 82.6%)(χ(2)=0.004, P=0.947). Univariate analysis showed that survival was only associated with recurrence and metastasis (χ(2)=4.292, P=0.038). Multivariate Cox analysis showed postoperative survival was not associated with any factors(all P>0.05). The 3-year survival rate of patients with postoperative recurrence or metastasis receiving imatinib therapy was better as compared to those who did not received imatinib(82.7% vs. 71.4%).
CONCLUSIONSRectal GIST are more common in the lower rectum. Surgery is the main treatment for rectal GIST. Local complete resection is the mainstay treatment. Extensive resection and lymph node clearance may not improve survival. Imatinib can improve the prognosis of patients with recurrence or metastasis.
Benzamides ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; therapy ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Piperazines ; Prognosis ; Pyrimidines ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate
2.Value of KRAS mutation predicting prognosis of patients with colorectal liver-only metastasis after hepatectomy
Jianhong PENG ; Junzhong LIN ; Yujie ZHAO ; Yuxiang DENG ; Qiaoqi SUI ; Zhizhong PAN
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2018;17(4):393-399
Objective To explore the value of KRAS mutation predicting prognosis of patients with colorectal liver-only metastasis after hepatectomy.Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 79 patients with colorectal liver-only metastasis who underwent hepatectomy in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between October 2010 and October 2016 were collected.KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer tissue was detected by fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and laser flight mass spectrometer.Observation indicators:(1) KRAS mutation;(2) relationship between KRAS mutation and clinicopathological factors of patients with colorectal liver-only metastasis;(3) follow-up and survival situations.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect recurrence-free survival and overall survival up to June 30,2017.The relationship between KRAS mutation and clinicopathological factors of patients with colorectal liver-only metastasis was analyzed by the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.The survival curve and time were respectively drawn and calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method,and COX regression model was used for survival analysis.Results (1) KRAS mutation:79 patients received KRAS gene detection of surgical tumor tissues,including 54 in wide-type mutation and 25 in mutant-type mutation.Of 25 patients in mutant-type mutation,mutation at codon 12 of KRAS exon 2 was in 21 patients,and GGT>GAT (G12D),GGT>GTT (G12V),GGT>TGT (G12C),GGT>GCT (G12A) and GGT>CGT (G12R) of mutation types were respectively detected in 13,4,2,1 and 1 patients;mutation at codon 13 of KRAS exon 2 was in 3 patients,with a mutation type of GGC>GAC (G13D);mutation at codon 61 of KRAS exon 3 was in 1 patient,with a mutation type of CAA>CAT (Q61H).(2) Relationship between KRAS mutation and clinicopathological factors of patients with colorectal liver-only metastasis:primary tumor located in right and left hemicolon were detected in 11,14 patients with mutant-type mutation and 7,47 patients with wide-type mutation,respectively,with a statistically significant difference (x2=9.357,P<0.05).(3) Follow-up and survival situations:79 patients were followed up for 2.0-71.0 months,with a median time of 29.0 months.Median recurrence-free survival time and median overall survival time were respectively 11.3 months,43.5 months in patients with mutant-type mutation and 9.9 months,44.3 months in patients with wide-type mutation,respectively,with no statistically significant difference in recurrence-free and overall survivals [hazard ratio (HR)=1.255,1.108,95% confidence interval (CI):0.741-2.126,0.521-2.355,P>0.05].Further analysis:of patients with low clinical risk score (CRS) of Memorial Sloan Caitlin Cancer Center (MSKCC),median recurrence-free survival time was 11.3 months in 17 patients with mutant-type mutation and 23.5 months in 26 patients with wide-type mutation,with a statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival of patients (HR=2.082,95%CI:1.006-4.307,P<0.05).The median overall survival time was 44.6 months in 17 patients with mutant-type mutation and 49.0 months in 26 patients with wide-type mutation,with no statistically significant difference in overall survival of patients (HR =1.165,95%CI:0.413-3.282,P>0.05).Of patients with high CRS of MSKCC,median recurrence-free survival time and median overall survival time were respectively 5.6 months,28.7 months in 7 patients with mutant-type mutation and 4.5 months,36.7 months in 24 patients with wide-type mutation,with no statistically significant difference in recurrence-free and overall survivals (HR=0.402,1.197,95%CI:0.284-1.656,0.371-3.866,P>0.05).Conclusions KRAS mutation is often detected in patients with right colon cancer.Recurrence-free survival time is obviously reduced in patients with KRAS mutation and low CRS of MSKCC.
3.Clinicopathological analysis of 61 patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Xiaojun WU ; Wu JIANG ; Rongxin ZHANG ; Peirong DING ; Gong CHEN ; Zhenhai LU ; Liren LI ; Yujing FANG ; Fulong WANG ; Lingheng KONG ; Junzhong LIN ; Zhizhong PAN ; Desen WAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;(4):335-339
Objective To explore the clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy, and prognostic factors for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 61 patients with rectal GIST in our department from January 1990 to Oc tober 2012 were analyzed retrospectively and pathology specimens were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate the influencing factors of prognosis with Log-rank test and Cox regression model. Results There were 42 male and 19 female patients with a median age of 59 years old. Eighteen cases (29.5%) were confirmed preoperatively as GIST by biopsy and 46 cases were diagnosed as GIST by first pathological examination. Fifteen cases (24.6%) were revised as GIST after re-examination of specimes among whom 14 cases had been diagnosed as leiomyoma or sarcoma, and 1 as neurolemmoma. Tumor location was above peritoneal reflection in 12 cases (19.7%) and below peritoneal reflection in 49 (80.3%). Fifty-two patients underwent surgery, including 21 extended resections(lymph nodes clearance and combined organs resection simultaneously) and 31 local resections (tumor rejection or partial resection of rectal wall). Eleven patients received preoperative imatinib(400 mg/d). Forty-one cases received imatinib therapy after operation or biopsy diagnosis, including 25 cases who received palliative treatment for postoperative recurrence. Median follow-up time was 55 (6 to 391) months and follow-up longer than 2 years was carried out in 46 patients. Overall survival rates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year were 98%, 95.6%, 86.0%and 73.7%respectively. There were no significant differences between local resection group (96.4%, 92%, 83.3%and 77.3%) and extended resection group (100%, 94.7%, 89.50%and 82.6%) (χ2=0.004, P=0.947). Univariate analysis showed that survival was only associated with recurrence and metastasis (χ2=4.292, P=0.038). Multivariate Cox analysis showed postoperative survival was not associated with any factors (all P>0.05). The 3-year survival rate of patients with postoperative recurrence or metastasis receiving imatinib therapy was better as compared to those who did not received imatinib (82.7%vs. 71.4%). Conclusions Rectal GIST are more common in the lower rectum. Surgery is the main treatment for rectal GIST. Local complete resection is the mainstay treatment. Extensive resection and lymph node clearance may not improve survival. Imatinib can improve the prognosis of patients with recurrence or metastasis.
4.Clinicopathological analysis of 61 patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Xiaojun WU ; Wu JIANG ; Rongxin ZHANG ; Peirong DING ; Gong CHEN ; Zhenhai LU ; Liren LI ; Yujing FANG ; Fulong WANG ; Lingheng KONG ; Junzhong LIN ; Zhizhong PAN ; Desen WAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;(4):335-339
Objective To explore the clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy, and prognostic factors for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 61 patients with rectal GIST in our department from January 1990 to Oc tober 2012 were analyzed retrospectively and pathology specimens were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate the influencing factors of prognosis with Log-rank test and Cox regression model. Results There were 42 male and 19 female patients with a median age of 59 years old. Eighteen cases (29.5%) were confirmed preoperatively as GIST by biopsy and 46 cases were diagnosed as GIST by first pathological examination. Fifteen cases (24.6%) were revised as GIST after re-examination of specimes among whom 14 cases had been diagnosed as leiomyoma or sarcoma, and 1 as neurolemmoma. Tumor location was above peritoneal reflection in 12 cases (19.7%) and below peritoneal reflection in 49 (80.3%). Fifty-two patients underwent surgery, including 21 extended resections(lymph nodes clearance and combined organs resection simultaneously) and 31 local resections (tumor rejection or partial resection of rectal wall). Eleven patients received preoperative imatinib(400 mg/d). Forty-one cases received imatinib therapy after operation or biopsy diagnosis, including 25 cases who received palliative treatment for postoperative recurrence. Median follow-up time was 55 (6 to 391) months and follow-up longer than 2 years was carried out in 46 patients. Overall survival rates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year were 98%, 95.6%, 86.0%and 73.7%respectively. There were no significant differences between local resection group (96.4%, 92%, 83.3%and 77.3%) and extended resection group (100%, 94.7%, 89.50%and 82.6%) (χ2=0.004, P=0.947). Univariate analysis showed that survival was only associated with recurrence and metastasis (χ2=4.292, P=0.038). Multivariate Cox analysis showed postoperative survival was not associated with any factors (all P>0.05). The 3-year survival rate of patients with postoperative recurrence or metastasis receiving imatinib therapy was better as compared to those who did not received imatinib (82.7%vs. 71.4%). Conclusions Rectal GIST are more common in the lower rectum. Surgery is the main treatment for rectal GIST. Local complete resection is the mainstay treatment. Extensive resection and lymph node clearance may not improve survival. Imatinib can improve the prognosis of patients with recurrence or metastasis.
5.Retrospective study of role of neoadjuvant rectal scores in evaluating the 10-year disease-free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery
Weili ZHANG ; Chi ZHOU ; Weifeng WANG ; Weihao LI ; Jiahua HE ; Zhenhai LU ; Xiaojun WU ; Junzhong LIN ; Jianhong PENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2024;27(6):608-614
Objective:To investigate the correlation between the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and long-term survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Methods:Clinical and pathological data of 487 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from October 2004 to April 2014 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed and the impact of NAR score on prognosis studied. Disease-free-survival (DFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and survivals compared using the log-rank test. Cox models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive capability of NAR and tumor regression grade scores for the risk of 10-year postoperative recurrence and metastasis. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two scores.Results:Of the 487 patients included in the study, 166 were men (34.1%). The median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46–63). All patients completed adequate preoperative chemoradiotherapy and underwent R0 resection.The median interval between the end of chemoradiotherapy and surgery was 51 days (IQR: 44–58). Post-chemoradiotherapy downstaging occurred in 329 patients (67.6%). Tumor regression grades (TRGs) were 1–2 in 246 patients (50.5%) and 3–4 in 241 patients (49.5%). A total of 394 patients (80.9%) received postoperative chemotherapy. NAR scores were <8 in 182 patients (37.4%), 8–16 in 180 (37.0%), and >16 in 125 (25.6%). The median follow-up time was 111.5 months (IQR: 70.7–133.7 months). One hundred and thirteen patients died of rectal cancer, among whom 13 patients developed local recurrence, 88 patients developed distant metastasis, and 12 patients had unknown recurrence patterns. The 10-year DFS and overall survival rate of f the whole group were 68.9% and 71.5% respectively. The 10-year DFS rates for patients with NAR scores <8, 8–16, and >16 were 85.1%, 80.5%, and 66.4%, respectively ( P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the Dixon operation (HR=0.606, 95%CI: 0.408–0.902, P=0.014), and >16 (HR=2.569, 95%CI: 1.559–4.233, P<0.001) were independent predictors of the 10-year DFS of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer ( P<0.05 for all). In the entire patient cohort, the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve for NAR score predicting 10-year recurrence and metastasis was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.62–0.72), whereas the AUC for TRG score was 0.54 (95%CI: 0.49–0.60). The two scores differed significantly in accuracy ( Z=-4.06, P<0.001), the NAR score being a significantly better predictor of risk of 10-year recurrence and metastasis than the TRG score. Conclusion:The NAR score is a reliable predictor of 10-year DFS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery.
6.Retrospective study of role of neoadjuvant rectal scores in evaluating the 10-year disease-free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery
Weili ZHANG ; Chi ZHOU ; Weifeng WANG ; Weihao LI ; Jiahua HE ; Zhenhai LU ; Xiaojun WU ; Junzhong LIN ; Jianhong PENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2024;27(6):608-614
Objective:To investigate the correlation between the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and long-term survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Methods:Clinical and pathological data of 487 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from October 2004 to April 2014 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed and the impact of NAR score on prognosis studied. Disease-free-survival (DFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and survivals compared using the log-rank test. Cox models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive capability of NAR and tumor regression grade scores for the risk of 10-year postoperative recurrence and metastasis. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two scores.Results:Of the 487 patients included in the study, 166 were men (34.1%). The median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46–63). All patients completed adequate preoperative chemoradiotherapy and underwent R0 resection.The median interval between the end of chemoradiotherapy and surgery was 51 days (IQR: 44–58). Post-chemoradiotherapy downstaging occurred in 329 patients (67.6%). Tumor regression grades (TRGs) were 1–2 in 246 patients (50.5%) and 3–4 in 241 patients (49.5%). A total of 394 patients (80.9%) received postoperative chemotherapy. NAR scores were <8 in 182 patients (37.4%), 8–16 in 180 (37.0%), and >16 in 125 (25.6%). The median follow-up time was 111.5 months (IQR: 70.7–133.7 months). One hundred and thirteen patients died of rectal cancer, among whom 13 patients developed local recurrence, 88 patients developed distant metastasis, and 12 patients had unknown recurrence patterns. The 10-year DFS and overall survival rate of f the whole group were 68.9% and 71.5% respectively. The 10-year DFS rates for patients with NAR scores <8, 8–16, and >16 were 85.1%, 80.5%, and 66.4%, respectively ( P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the Dixon operation (HR=0.606, 95%CI: 0.408–0.902, P=0.014), and >16 (HR=2.569, 95%CI: 1.559–4.233, P<0.001) were independent predictors of the 10-year DFS of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer ( P<0.05 for all). In the entire patient cohort, the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve for NAR score predicting 10-year recurrence and metastasis was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.62–0.72), whereas the AUC for TRG score was 0.54 (95%CI: 0.49–0.60). The two scores differed significantly in accuracy ( Z=-4.06, P<0.001), the NAR score being a significantly better predictor of risk of 10-year recurrence and metastasis than the TRG score. Conclusion:The NAR score is a reliable predictor of 10-year DFS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery.