ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effec between sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) and continuous blood purification (CBP) in critically ill patients.MethodsAccording to the treatment ways,96 critically ill patients were divided into SLED group and CBP group.A comparison was made on the biochemical indicators,in-hospital duration,hemodynamic parameters,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE-Ⅱ ),the survival and the mortality rates.ResultsAfter treatment,the levels of serum creatine kinase isozyme MB (CK-MB),creatine kinase (CK),creatinine (Cr),glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase (AST),glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (ALT),APACHE Ⅱ score on the 1st,2nd and 7th day were lower than those prior to the treatment in both groups ( P ＜0.05).There were no statistical differences in in-hospital duration, biochemical indicators, APACHEⅡscore,hemodynamic parameters,the survival rate and the mortality rate between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05 ).ConclusionsSLED has similar hemodynamic stability with CBP,and the two methods have similar treatment effects in critically ill patients.However,SLED can be relatively economical and convenient for critically ill patients in clinical.