Obiective To evaluate the value of allograft bone for acetab ular and femoral reconstruction in THA revision surgery. Methods A total of 19 p atients underwent reconstruction of acetabular and proximal femoral bone defects from June 1996 to December 2000 were reviewed. Eleven of the patients were men and 8 women with a mean age of 66.5 years and 63.2 years respectively at the t ime of resision surgery. According to AAOS system, the acetabular bone defects w ere classified into type I in 2 hips, type II 10 hips and type III 4 hips, and o n the femoral side, there were type I in 3 hips, type II 11 hips and type III 2 hips respectively. The reconstruction of bone defect of acetabulum included stru ctural allograft in 3 hips, impacted morselized allograft in 3 hips, and metal w ire mesh with morselized allograft in 3 hips. In all 3 of femoral segemental def ects, the reconstructions of the proximal femoral bone defects were done with st ructural allografts. Metalwire mesh with morselized allograft for femoral bone d efects were performed in 2 cases and morselized allogratts alone for femoral bon e defects in 4 cases; both acetabular and femoral bone defects were reconstruct ed with impacted morselized allografts in 6 cases (7 hips), and 4 patients with no bone grafts; Harris score system and radiograph were used for the final eva luation. Results Ninteen patients were followed up for an average period of 46 m onths (ranges, 6 to 68 months), Harris score improved from 42.7 points pre rev ision to 82.7 points at final follow up, the incorporation of allografts bone in 15 patients (16 hips) were noticed radiographically in all but one hip was fo und reabsorption of the structural allograft and radiolucents were found in the other 3 patients. No infection was encountered in this series. Conclusion If th e different types of bone defects were properly identified and suitable allogrft s adopted, reconstruction of bone defects with allografts during the THA revisi on surgery is a useful and reliable method. [

Objective To investigate the efficacy of allograft bone in posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis. Methods From March 1995 to March 2000, 60 patients with scoliosis, who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion using allograft or autograft bone, were evaluated prospectively. All of the patients were randomized into group A (30 cases using only allograft bone) and group B(30 cases using autograft iliac bone).Among the patients in group A, there were 16 with congenital scoliosis, 12 with idiopathic scoliosis, 1 with neurofibromatsis scoliosis and Marfan syndrome respectively. The average age at surgery was 14 years 6 months. the average preoperative major curve was 86.6? with an average number of 8 fused segments (range, 4 to 10 segments). Whereas in group B, there were 15 with congenital scoliosis, 9 with idiopathic scoliosis, 5 with neurofibromtasis scoliosis and 1 with Marfan syndrome. The average age at surgery was 13 years and 8 months. The average preoperative major curve was 77.8? with an average number of 7 fused segments (range, 5 to 10 segments). The mean operative duration, average blood loss, complications and loss of correction between the two groups were analyzed comparatively. Results Each patient had a minimum 2-year follow-up with an average duration of 4 years 5 months. Group A was better than group B by a shorter operative duration, less blood loss. At last follow-up, the major curve measured an average of 44? (range, 31? to 72?) in group A and 41? (range, 24? to 68?) in group B respectively. There were 3 (10%) and 2 (6.7%) pseudoarthrosis occurred in group A and group B respectively. One superficial infection developed in group A. There was no significant difference of the average loss of correction and complication rate between the 2 groups. But there were 6 patients who had donor site pain in group B. Conclusion A satisfactory outcome can be achieved in posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis using allograft bone especially when a large amount of bone graft is needed.

Objective To discuss The Clinical Significance of Eosinophil (EOS) in urosepsis. Methods A total of 99 patients of urosepsis in Department of Urology,Guangdong Provincial TCM Hospital from Mar. 2013 to Jul. 2016 were selected as research objects by retrospective analysis. The patients were classified into groupEOS= 0 andgroup EOS > 0,group PCT(procalcitonin)≥ 2 ng/mL andgroup PCT < 2 ng/mL,the differences of PCT concentration and percentage of EOS in two groups were analyzed comparatively. 99 patients of urosepsiswere also compared the difference of the percentage of EOS with another group including 100 patients of urinary tract infection (UTI) without Sepsis. Results The percentage of EOS was significantly decreased in 86.9%(86/99)of patients of urosepsis. The paired student t test show the percentage of EOS in two days after treatment,four days after treatment, before hospital discharge were higher than that before the treatment, the difference wassignificant (P < 0.05). The Independent-Sample Test show that the PCTconcentration in EOS = 0 group were higher than EOS > 0 group,the percentage of EOS in PCT≥2 ng/mL groupwere lower than PCT<2 ng/mL group,difference were significant(P<0.05). And The Independent-Sample Testalso showed that the percentage of EOS of the Urosepsis group was definitely lower than the UTI group without Sepsis. Difference was statistically significant. Concusions The percentage of EOS could be applied to assess the severity of urosepsis, monitor the disease progression and evaluate the infection control. The cost was lower than PCT in therapeuticprocess ofurosepsis.

OBJECTIVETo discuss the causes and treatments of wound infections after scoliosis surgery.

METHODSNine hundred and twenty-four caes of scoliosis were reviewed, and the clinical data of 15 cases of postoperative infection were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTSAll 15 cases underwent spinal posterior fusion with autologous bone graft using instrumentations. Seven were diagnosed as early infection, and 8 were delayed infection. Radical debridement was performed in all 15 cases. The duration of antibiotics administration was 10 to 34 days with continuous closed irrigation for 2 to approximately 4 weeks and primary closure for the wounds. All patients were followed up for an average of 3.5 years (2 to 7.5 years) with good outcomes and no recurrence.

CONCLUSIONWound infection following surgical correction of scoliosis primarily results from intraoperative seeding, although host-related and operation-related factors may contribute to its development. Once the infections are diagnosed, good results can be achieved by prompt surgical debridement, irrigation and reasonably administered antibiotics. Removal of hardware may be necessary in deep infections.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Child ; Debridement ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis ; surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; adverse effects ; Staphylococcal Infections ; therapy ; Surgical Wound Infection ; therapy

OBJECTIVETo investigate the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODSBetween 1983 and 2000, 6 patients with infection after TKAs were treated, including 2 men and 4 women, aged on average 63 years (44 - 75 years). Initial knee arthroplasty was performed for osteoarthritis in 4 patients and for rheumatoid arthritis in 2 knees. The timing of diagnosis of infection after knee arthroplasty averaged 50 months (range, 1 month-11 years). Simple debridement and antibiotic treatment were prescribed for 3 patients, debridement and one-stage reimplantation for 1, debridement and two-stage reimplantation for 1, and athrodesis for 1.

RESULTSOf the 3 patients with simple debridement, one was cured, one failed but underwent athrodesis later, and one lost to follow up. Two patients with reimplantation were cured and had good function recovery. All of the 6 patients were followed up on average for 4 years. No infection recurred except one who lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSManagement of infection after total knee arthroplasty includes antibiotic suppression and debridement with prosthesis retention, insertion of another prosthesis as a one-stage or two-stage exchange technique, knee arthrodesis and amputation. These treatments have specific indications. To treat infection after total knee arthroplasty, suitable method should be taken according to patient's condition. Arthrodesis is the best salvage operation, though it may handicap patients' daily life. Reimplantation of another prosthesis could maintain a functional joint.

Adult ; Aged ; Arthrodesis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; adverse effects ; Debridement ; Female ; Humans ; Infection ; therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; therapy ; Reoperation

Objective: To explore the application value of CT imaging in differentiating gastric stromal tumors (GST) from gastric leiomyomas (GLMs). Methods: CT images of patients with GST (n=65) or GLMs (n=13, maximum diameter of tumor ≤5 cm) proved by surgery and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. The tumor size, location, contour, growth pattern, degree and pattern of enhancement, calcification, necrosis, surface ulceration, lymph nodes, and patient clinical data were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess the measurement and calculation parameters in the differentiation of GST and GLMs. Results: Between the GST and GLMs groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the contour, growth pattern, calcification, surface ulceration, and patient's sex (P>0.05). CT values of in plain scans, degree of enhancement in arterial phase (DE1), size, location and pattern of enhancement were found to be different between GST and GLMs (P<0.05). When the cutoff value of the maximum tumor diameter was 3.2 cm, the area under ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity were 0.707, 92.3%(12/13) and 60.6%(40/66), respectively. When the cutoff value of age was 59 years, the area under ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity were 0.773, 92.3% (12/13) and 46.2% (30/65), respectively. Taking the cutoff value of 10.9 HU as the degree of enhancement in arterial phase (DE1), the area under ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity were 0.774, 84.6% (11/13) and 77.3% (51/66), respectively. Using a cutoff value of 30.3 HU, the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under ROC curve were 84.6% (11/13), 65.2% (43/66), and 0.731, respectively. Conclusions CT examination in addition to clinical data can be very helpful for the differential diagnosis of GLMs from GSTs in maximum diameter ≤5 cm.

Objective To compare the different therapeutic efficacies between radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation(AF)patients with enlarged left atrium.Methods A total of 106 AF patients with enlarged left atrium(LAVI)>34ml/m2 who visited our center between December 2016 and May 2022 for catheter ablation were enrolled.They were divided into radiofrequency group(R-group)and cryoballoon group(C-group)according to the procedure.The recurrence of AF was compared between the two groups.Results The median follow-up time was 12 months and no death occurred.The rate of loss of follow-up was 3.8%.The overall recurrence rate of AF after ablation was 36.8%.There was no significant difference in clinical baseline between the two groups(P>0.05).The radiofrequency group had longer operation time(P<0.001),shorter X-ray time and less exposure(P<0.05);There was no significant difference in clinical baseline and postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).The results of survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the survival rate of patients without atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For AF patients with enlarged left atrium,the clinical effects of the two methods were similar.Cryoballoon takes a shorter time,while radiofrequency has a lower X-ray time and exposure dose for physicians and patients.Therefore,appropriate ablation methods should be selected according to the actual situation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current status of diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis (AA) in China. METHODS: Questionnaire survey was used to retrospectively collect data of hospitalized patients with AA from 43 medical centers nationwide in 2017 (Sort by number of cases provided: Jinling Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Lu'an People's Hospital, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Dalian Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Dongying People's Hospital, Jinjiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huangshan Shoukang Hospital, Xuyi People's Hospital, Nanjing Jiangbei People's Hospital, Lanzhou 940th Hospital of PLA, Heze Municipal Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science of China Three Gorges University, Affiliated Jiujiang Hospital of Nanchang University, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Affiliated Central Hospital of Shandong Zaozhuang Mining Group, The Third People's Hospital of Kunshan City, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, The 81st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Linyi Central Hospital, The General Hospital of Huainan Eastern Hospital Group, The 908th Hospital of PLA, Liyang People's Hospital, The 901th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, The Fourth Hospital of Jilin University, Harbin Acheng District People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Nanjing Luhe People's Hospital, Taixing Municipal People's Hospital, Baotou Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Linyi People's Hospital, The 72st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, People's Hospital of Dayu County, Taixing City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Beijing Guang'anmen Hospital, Langxi County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanyang Central Hospital, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University).The diagnosis and management of AA were analyzed through unified summary. Different centers collected and summarized their data in 2017 and sent back the questionnaires for summary. RESULTS: A total of 8 766 AA patients were enrolled from 43 medical centers, including 4 711 males (53.7%) with median age of 39 years and 958 (10.9%) patients over 65 years old. Of 8 776 patients, 5 677 cases (64.6%) received one or more imaging examinations, and the other 3 099 (35.4%) did not receive any imaging examination. A total of 1 858 (21.2%) cases received medical treatment, mainly a combination of nitroimidazoles (1 107 cases, 59.8%) doublet regimen, followed by a single-agent regimen of non-nitroimidazoles (451 cases, 24.4%), a nitroimidazole-free doublet regimen (134 cases, 7.2%), a triple regimen of combined nitroimidazoles (116 cases, 6.3%), nitroimidazole alone (39 cases, 2.1%) and nitroimidazole-free triple regimen (3 cases, 0.2%). Of the 6 908 patients (78.8%) who underwent surgery, 4 319 (62.5%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 2589 (37.5%) underwent open surgery. Ratio of laparotomy was higher in those patients under 16 years old (392 cases) or over 65 years old (258 cases) [15.1%(392/2 589) and 10.0%(258/2 589), respectively, compared with 8.5%(367/4 316) and 8.0%(347/4 316) in the same age group for laparoscopic surgery, χ²=91.415, P<0.001; χ²=15.915,P<0.001]. Patients with complicated appendicitis had higher ratio of undergoing open surgery as compared to those undergoing laparoscopic surgery [26.7%(692/2 589) vs. 15.6%(672/4 316), χ²=125.726, P<0.001].The cure rates of laparoscopic and open surgery were 100.0% and 99.8%(2 585/2 589) respectively without significant difference (P=0.206). Postoperative complication rates were 4.5%(121/2 589) and 4.7%(196/4 316) respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ²=0.065, P=0.799). The incidence of surgical site infection was lower (0.6% vs. 1.7%, χ²=17.315, P<0.001), and hospital stay was shorter [6(4-7) days vs. 6(5-8) days, U=4 384 348.0, P<0.001] in the laparoscopic surgery group, while hospitalization cost was higher (median 12 527 yuan vs. 9 342 yuan, U=2 586 809.0, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still clinically based, supplemented by imaging examination. Appendectomy is still the most effective treatment at present. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the main treatment strategy, but anti-infective drugs are also very effective.
Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; diagnosis ; therapy ; China ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult