1.Community-based evaluation of the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0
Yueqin HUANY ; Shoufu XIE ; Jin LU ; Junting XU ; Weimin DANG ; Yi LI ; Zhaorui LIU ; Rui CHI
Chinese Mental Health Journal 2010;24(1):21-24,28
Objective:To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of Chinese version of World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.0(CIDI-3.0)by community-based study.Methods:Among 202 subjects from Dalian city,with the clinician-administered Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV(SCID),102 patents were diagnostic as mood disorder,anxiety disorder,schizophrenia or psychotic disorder and so on.All of the patients and the other 100 subjects without mental disorders as the control group were interviewed blindly by CIDI-3.0 to test the validity of CIDI-3.0.Ten patients among them were interviewed twice independently in a 7-day interval to evaluate the reliability of CIDI-3.0.Results:(1)For the screen section,the sensitivity values of different mental disorders ranged from 60.4% to 93.1%,while the specificity values from 33.6% to 92.7%.The positive predictive values were from 60.1% to 95.1%,and the negative predictive values were from 68.1% to 93.7%.(2)For different mental disorders,the specificity values ranged from 97.1% to 98.9%,while the sensitivity values were from 33.3% to 70.3%.Positive predict values were from 66.7% to 95.7%,and negative predictive values were from 87.7% to 95.4%.(3)The consistency was 0.78 in any mental disorder.(4)For test-retest reliability,kappa values ranged from 0.737 to 1.0.Conclusion:By clinical reappraisal,the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has satisfied validity and reliability.The screen section has high sensitivity,while the diagnostic sections have high specificities.That indicates that CIDI-3.0 is acceptable as a validated instrument for community survey on mental disorders.
2.Methodological analysis of different types of reviews
Xiaodan NIU ; Hongxia TAO ; Haihui RUAN ; Junting CHI ; Jing ZHANG ; Yanhong WANG
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2021;27(10):1391-1396
Literature review is an essential link in nursing research. A systematic and rigorous literature review can transform the existing primary research into evidence that effectively guides nursing practice, thereby promoting the development of nursing specialization. This article introduces common review types such as the systematic review, Meta-analysis, overview of systematic reviews, Meta-synthesis, scoping review, and integrative review, and distinguishes the similarities and differences of different types of reviews, and analyzes their advantages and limitations, in order to improve the scientific and professional level of nursing practice, and promote the development of evidence-based and nursing disciplines.
3.Research progress on the application of virtual reality technology in patients with kinetophobia
Zhaoyuan WANG ; Shujuan LIU ; Kaixin LI ; Mengxue GUO ; Tong SUN ; Yujing LI ; Yujiao CHI ; Junting WANG
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2024;30(24):3336-3340
Virtual reality technology is an emerging technology that integrates multiple disciplines. It has the advantages of immersion, interactivity and imagination, which provides convenience for intelligent nursing in the field of rehabilitation treatment. This paper summarizes the application research of virtual reality technology in patients with kinetophobia, focusing on classification, application mechanism, application status, limitations and future development of virtual reality technology in various diseases of kinetophobia, so as to provide reference and basis for the rehabilitation nursing of patients with kinetophobia based on virtual reality technology in the future.