1.Submission Rates of Medication Notebooks in Insurance Pharmacies
Kazuki Ide ; Yoshihiro Ikumi ; Aya Kiuchi ; Junko Sone ; Makoto Kojima ; Hiroshi Yamada
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics 2015;16(4):201-205
Objective: To reveal the current use of medication notebooks in clinical practice and the differences in submission rates of medication notebooks among patients with different sociodemographic and medical characteristics.
Methods: We conducted a survey of the submission rates by studying the medication history, from June 19, 2014, to July 3, 2014.
Results: The overall submission rate of returning patients was 57.1% and the submission rate of patients who visit a single medical institution was significantly lower than patients who visit more than two (55.4% vs. 67.7%, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression also indicated significant differences between the single and multiple medical institution visit group (adjusted OR=2.74 [95% CI: 1.93-3.89], p<0.001). Submission rates for patients in their 20, 30, and 50 s who visit a single medical institution were lower than 40%.
Conclusions: To improve the usefulness of the community pharmacy and increase the submission rate, we need to increase awareness of the importance of medication notebooks among patients who visit a single medical institution. Additionally, future studies need to focus on factors such as age-related issues that might affect submission rates.
2.Association of the Glasgow Prognostic Score and Prognostic Nutritional Index With Survival Time in Patients Receiving Nivolumab for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Satoshi OYAMADA ; Naoki HISAMATSU ; Junko KOJIMA ; Shoichi ISAKA ; Akihiro NOMURA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2021;70(1):32-37
Although programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a prognostic biomarker for nivolumab therapy, it is not very reliable due to its low accuracy. The pharmacological effect of nivolumab involves the cancer immunity cycle, a process that involves T cells, which are strongly associated with nutrition. In this study, we retrospectively investigated whether two measures of nutrition, namely, the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), could predict response to nivolumab as evaluated in terms of survival time. The subjects were 37 patients treated with nivolumab in the Department of Respiratory Medicine at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. Patients were classified into 2 PNI risk groups (low and high risk) and 3 GPS groups (0, 1, and 2), with lower GPS indicating better nutrition. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare differences between the PNI groups and between each possible pairing of GPS groups. Survival time was significantly longer for the low-risk PNI group compared with the high-risk PNI group and for a GPS score of 0 versus 2 and 1 versus 2, but there was no significant difference for a GPS score of 0 versus 1. These results show that GPS and PNI may be potential predictors of response to nivolumab in non-small cell lung cancer.