Improvements in the performance of health personnel are being sought in an effort to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Emphasis has thus been placed on the development of health personnel as part of a national UHC strategy throughout the world. In light of this, we planned the present symposium as a means of reviewing the current nursing trends in Southeast Asia and to investigate the issues facing the practical development of nursing personnel, as well as the future directions of nursing support, with a deliberate focus on UHC.
  At the symposium, changes in health issues in Japan, the contributions of nursing professionals in achieving UHC, and the educational programs required by Japanese nursing personnel for international cooperation were first presented. Next, the status of health personnel in Southeast Asia was reviewed. In particular, the status of the regulatory frameworks regarding nursing personnel and the measures for enhancing the practical ability of nurses through legal means were introduced separately for Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Myanmar. Subsequently, as case examples of emerging countries in Southeast Asia, the nursing policies of Thailand and Indonesia were reviewed, measures for improving the practical ability of nurses through legal means in Indonesia were introduced, and support for enhancing networks within autonomous regions was proposed.
  International cooperation in the field of nursing requires strategic and comprehensive support for the development of nursing personnel in healthcare systems variable to economic growth and the means by which to achieve this are diversifying. Indeed, the symposium indicated the importance of responding to the diversity of support by enhancing networks of Japanese individuals involved in international cooperation and providing support for the enhancement of independent networks in Southeast Asia.

Purpose：This study investigated the current state of medical care and home palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients in Japan. Methods：We conducted a retrospective questionnaire study of 352 cancer patients who received home palliative care from 6 specialized home care clinics and discontinued home care or died from January to June in 2012. Results：The questionnaire was answered by 290 patients〔165 men（57％）, mean age：72±13 years〕who started home palliative care after completing cancer treatment. Home visits from nurses were used by 238 patients（98％）and 95 patients（39％）used home care workers. Within a month before discontinuation of home care or death, 72 patients（30％）received fluid therapy and 127 patients（52％）received strong opioids. The outcome of home palliative care was death at home in 242 patients（83％）and discontinuation of home care in 48 patients（17％）. The reason for discontinuation was family physical and mental problems or physical problems of the patient. Conclusion：This study demonstrated the current state of home palliative care by specialized home care clinics.

Objectives:To determine the factors influencing death or the cessation of palliative care in home-based setting among patients with cancer. Methods:We included 352 terminally ill patients with cancer who received home-based palliative care from six specialized palliative care clinics. We reviewed the medical charts when patients died at home or chose to stop home care. Results:A total of 82％ of participants died at home, and 18％ chose to stop home care. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed five independent factors that affected cessation of home-based palliative care:patient and informal caregiver preferences for the place of death not to be at home［odds ratio, 10.1（95％ Confidential interval, 2.5-40.9）and 51.9（11.9-226.6）, respectively］or uncertain preferences［5.0（1.3-19.4）, 10.8（2.3-50.5）］;anxiety and depression among informal caregiver［4.1（1.2-13.9）］;lower frequency of informal care［6.8（2.0-23.4）］;and history of admittance to hospital during home care［11.6（4.0-33.9）］. Conclusion:We revealed independent factors influencing death or the cessation of palliative care in home-based settings among patients with cancer. Our findings suggest the importance of providing support for decision making about the place of death and hospital admission, and psychosocial support for informal caregiver to ensure home death consistent with patient preference.

Purpose: This study investigated the current state of critical hemorrhage during home palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical chart review of 7 cancer patients (1.4%) who received home palliative care from our clinic and died of critical hemorrhage at home from October 2007 to December 2014. Results: Four patients were male, the mean age was 70±11 years, and underlying diseases were different. None of the patients were accompanied by medical staff at the onset of bleeding. Six patients died at home and one patient was admitted to hospital for hemostasis. Six patients had a pre-hemorrhage episode more than 24 hours before critical hemorrhage occurred from the same site. One patient was administered a hemostatic agent, hemostasis was attempted in one, and one was given sedation. Six patients wanted to die at home, and did die at home. Discussion: If terminally ill cancer patients have critical hemorrhage at home, our options are limited. The results of this study suggest the importance of hemorrhage risk assessment and advance care planning.

OBJECTIVES: The favorable safety and consistent effectiveness of monthly intravenous (IV) ibandronate injections was demonstrated in a prospective, postmarketing, observational study in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. Here, we present subgroup analyses from the study. METHODS: Lumbar spine (L2–4) bone mineral density (BMD) gains were assessed in the following subgroups: aged <75 or ≥75 years, absence or presence of vertebral fractures, previous bisphosphonate (BP) treatment, and concomitant versus naïve osteoporosis drug treatment. The cumulative incidence of fractures and relative change in bone turnover markers were also examined. RESULTS: Of 1062 enrolled patients, 1025 received monthly IV ibandronate 1 mg and were assessed for 12 months. BMD gains with ibandronate were comparable, irrespective of older age or prevalent fractures. Overall, 515 patients (50.2%) had previously received osteoporosis treatment; of these, 166 (16.1%) received other BPs. Mean BMD changes were 3.69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89%–6.50%) in patients previously treated with other BPs, and 4.26% (95% CI, 2.88%–5.64%) in patients who had not received prior osteoporosis treatment. Among the 510 patients (49.7%) concomitantly prescribed active vitamin D drugs, mean BMD changes were 5.74% (95% CI, 2.53%–8.95%) with eldecalcitol versus 3.54% (95% CI, 1.98%–5.10%) with ibandronate alone. The lowest fracture incidence was observed with the combination of ibandronate and eldecalcitol, but differences between the subgroups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly IV ibandronate demonstrated comparable BMD gains in the patient subgroups analyzed. Concomitant use of ibandronate with eldecalcitol showed a trend of higher BMD gains and lower fracture incidence than ibandronate alone.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling ; Humans ; Incidence ; Japan ; Observational Study ; Osteoporosis ; Prospective Studies ; Spine ; Vitamin D

OBJECTIVES: This postmarketing, observational study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of monthly intravenous (IV) ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Eligible patients received monthly IV ibandronate 1mg for 12 months. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) were assessed using matched t-test analysis. Cumulative fracture rates were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: In total, 1062 patients were enrolled, of whom 1025 (n = 887 women, n = 138 men) were treated. Mean patient age was 77 years. Seventy-five ADRs were reported in 54 patients (5.26%). Four patients (0.39%) experienced serious ADRs, including one case of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Acute-phase reactions occurred in 21 patients (2.04%), and half of them arose after the first ibandronate injection. No new safety concerns were identified. Significant increases in BMD at 12 months relative to baseline were observed at the lumbar spine (4.84%, n = 187; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.47%–6.21%), femoral neck (2.73%, n = 166; 95% CI, 1.46%–4.01%), and total hip (1.93%, n = 133; 95% CI, 0.80%–3.07%). Significant reductions were observed in all BTMs at 12 months (n = 174 in tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, n = 101 in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide at baseline). The cumulative incidence of nontraumatic, new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures was 3.16% (95% CI, 2.12%–4.70%). Analyses in women only showed similar results to the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the favorable safety and consistent effectiveness of ibandronate, and indicate that monthly IV ibandronate would be beneficial in daily practice for the treatment of Japanese patients with osteoporosis.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Female ; Femur Neck ; Hip ; Humans ; Incidence ; Japan ; Jaw ; Observational Study ; Osteonecrosis ; Osteoporosis ; Procollagen ; Prospective Studies ; Spine