Purpose: This study aimed to identify the healthcare election promises made by political parties whose members participate in the Health and Welfare Committee of the 22nd National Assembly. We evaluated whether Korea’s major political parties address various components of the health system, pursue balanced goals for healthcare improvement, and utilize diverse instruments to reform the health sector. Methods: We identified healthcare promises from the top 10 promises submitted by each political party to the National Election Commission, focusing on those classified under “health and welfare” or containing relevant healthcare content. The unit of analysis was the implementation methods within each promise. These promises were then classified using the WHO’s six building blocks of a health system, the quintuple aim for healthcare improvement, and the five control knobs for health sector reform. Results: A total of 33 election promises were identified. Promises related to regional health services and the health workforce were most common, followed closely by caregiving. In terms of the health system building blocks, service delivery was the dominant focus, and among the quintuple aims, improving the patient experience prevailed. Regulation emerged as the most frequently used control knob. Conclusion Healthcare promises mirror societal demands concerning the health workforce, regional healthcare disparities, and caregiving burdens. Although the content varied among parties, significant commonalities were observed. A balanced approach to healthcare financing, along with a broader range of policy reform instruments beyond regulation, is necessary to address health system challenges.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the healthcare election promises made by political parties whose members participate in the Health and Welfare Committee of the 22nd National Assembly. We evaluated whether Korea’s major political parties address various components of the health system, pursue balanced goals for healthcare improvement, and utilize diverse instruments to reform the health sector. Methods: We identified healthcare promises from the top 10 promises submitted by each political party to the National Election Commission, focusing on those classified under “health and welfare” or containing relevant healthcare content. The unit of analysis was the implementation methods within each promise. These promises were then classified using the WHO’s six building blocks of a health system, the quintuple aim for healthcare improvement, and the five control knobs for health sector reform. Results: A total of 33 election promises were identified. Promises related to regional health services and the health workforce were most common, followed closely by caregiving. In terms of the health system building blocks, service delivery was the dominant focus, and among the quintuple aims, improving the patient experience prevailed. Regulation emerged as the most frequently used control knob. Conclusion Healthcare promises mirror societal demands concerning the health workforce, regional healthcare disparities, and caregiving burdens. Although the content varied among parties, significant commonalities were observed. A balanced approach to healthcare financing, along with a broader range of policy reform instruments beyond regulation, is necessary to address health system challenges.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the healthcare election promises made by political parties whose members participate in the Health and Welfare Committee of the 22nd National Assembly. We evaluated whether Korea’s major political parties address various components of the health system, pursue balanced goals for healthcare improvement, and utilize diverse instruments to reform the health sector. Methods: We identified healthcare promises from the top 10 promises submitted by each political party to the National Election Commission, focusing on those classified under “health and welfare” or containing relevant healthcare content. The unit of analysis was the implementation methods within each promise. These promises were then classified using the WHO’s six building blocks of a health system, the quintuple aim for healthcare improvement, and the five control knobs for health sector reform. Results: A total of 33 election promises were identified. Promises related to regional health services and the health workforce were most common, followed closely by caregiving. In terms of the health system building blocks, service delivery was the dominant focus, and among the quintuple aims, improving the patient experience prevailed. Regulation emerged as the most frequently used control knob. Conclusion Healthcare promises mirror societal demands concerning the health workforce, regional healthcare disparities, and caregiving burdens. Although the content varied among parties, significant commonalities were observed. A balanced approach to healthcare financing, along with a broader range of policy reform instruments beyond regulation, is necessary to address health system challenges.

Japanese encephalitis (JE) cases have been increasingly reported recently especially in Seoul and its vicinity. Pigs are known as amplifying host of JE virus (JEV), but do not play an important role in these recent events because pig-breeding is not common in Seoul. The distribution and the density of migratory birds are correlated with JE cases in cities and they might be highly potential hosts contributing to transmit JEV in metropolitan areas. JE genotype and sero-prevalence in birds should be determined for the verification of the transmission route of JEV in the recent sporadic occurrence of JE cases in Seoul.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Birds ; Encephalitis, Japanese ; Genotype ; Humans ; Korea ; Seoul ; Swine