1.Two Cases of Humoral Hypercalcemia of Malignancy in Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Seungtaek LIM ; Jungwoo HAN ; Kyeong Hye PARK ; Won Jai JUNG ; Yong Kang LEE ; Ara CHOI ; Young Jae KIM ; Jong Chan LEE ; Hye Jin CHOI
Cancer Research and Treatment 2013;45(2):145-149
Humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM) is rarely associated with cholangiocarcinoma (CC), and represents dismal prognosis. A 63-year-old male was admitted for evaluation of an intrahepatic mass. He was diagnosed with HHM associated with locally advanced CC. As the tumor responded to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin, serum calcium level was normalized. However, according to the disease progression, he suffered recurrence of HHM and he expired approximately one year after initial diagnosis. A 68-year-old male who presented with abdominal pain was diagnosed with metastatic CC. After the eighth cycle of gemcitabine and cisplatin, progression of the disease was found with HHM. He was treated with the best supportive care, until his demise approximately one month after the diagnosis of HHM. We report on two cases of HHM associated with CC that demonstrate strong correlation between hypercalcemia and disease burden.
Abdominal Pain
;
Calcium
;
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Cholangiocarcinoma
;
Cisplatin
;
Deoxycytidine
;
Disease Progression
;
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
;
Hypercalcemia
;
Male
;
Paraneoplastic Syndromes
;
Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein
;
Prognosis
;
Recurrence
;
Capecitabine
2.Comparative Study of a Single-Incision Laparoscopic and a Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis.
Jungwoo KANG ; Byung Noe BAE ; Geumhee GWAK ; Inseok PARK ; Hyunjin CHO ; Keunho YANG ; Ki Whan KIM ; Sehwan HAN ; Hong Joo KIM ; Young Duck KIM
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2012;28(6):304-308
PURPOSE: For the treatment of acute appendicitis, a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been widely performed. Recently, the use of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is increasing because it is believed to have advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we compared SILS and a conventional LA. METHODS: We analyzed the 217 patients who received laparoscopy-assisted appendectomies between August 2010 and April 2012 at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital. One hundred-twelve patients underwent SILS, and 105 patients underwent LA. For the two groups, we compared the operation times, postoperative laboratory results, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The patients' demographics, including body mass index, were not significantly different between the two groups. There were 6 perforated appendicitis cases in the SILS group and 5 cases in the LA group. The mean operative time in the SILS group was 65.88 +/- 22.74 minutes whereas that in the LA group was 61.70 +/- 22.27 minutes (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in the mean hospital stays, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and wound infections between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pain, complications and hospital stay showed no statistically significant differences between the SILS and the LA groups. However, our SILS method uses a single trocar and two latex tubes, so cost savings and reduced interference during surgery are expected.
Appendectomy
;
Appendicitis
;
Body Mass Index
;
Cost Savings
;
Demography
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopes
;
Laparoscopy
;
Latex
;
Length of Stay
;
Operative Time
;
Pain, Postoperative
;
Surgical Instruments
;
Wound Infection