Background/Aims: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) require careful anticoagulation because thrombotic and bleeding risks are both elevated. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and no anticoagulation in Korean patients with ESKD and AF. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we included 933 patients with ESKD and nonvalvular AF treated between 2010 and 2023. Patients were assigned to three groups by initial treatment: no anticoagulation (n = 604), warfarin (n = 197), or DOACs (n = 132). The primary efficacy outcome was ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (IS/SE); the primary safety outcome was major bleeding (MB). Secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Results: Both warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.55) and DOACs (aHR, 0.36) significantly reduced the risk of IS/SE compared with no anticoagulation. However, warfarin increased MB risk compared with no anticoagulation (aHR, 2.69), including ICH and GIB. DOACs also increased MB risk versus no anticoagulation (aHR, 1.37), driven primarily by ICH. Compared with warfarin, DOACs showed a lower MB risk (aHR, 0.51). Both warfarin and DOACs reduced all-cause mortality relative to no anticoagulation (aHR, 0.53 and 0.57, respectively). Conclusions Among Korean patients with ESKD and AF, both warfarin and DOACs reduced IS/SE but increased MB. Given their lower MB risk than warfarin, DOACs may be preferable for anticoagulation in this high-risk population.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Background: s/Aims: Phase angle (PhA), as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis, provides insights into hydration and nutritional status, making it a prognostic indicator of frailty. While low preoperative PhA has been linked to postoperative complications in cancer patients, its predictive value in individuals undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been thoroughly investigated.This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of preoperative PhA in predicting postoperative complications for patients undergoing PD. Methods: Among 41 patients who underwent PD at Seoul National University Hospital between September and December 2024, 35 were included in the analysis after excluding 6 patients who had concomitant blood vessel or other organ resections. Patients were divided into low (Comprehensive Complication Index [CCI] ≤ 20) and high (CCI > 20) complication groups based on the CCI, derived from the Clavien–Dindo classification. The differences in PhA between the two groups were analyzed, and logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between PhA and CCI. Results: The mean PhA was significantly lower in the high-CCI group compared to the low-CCI group (5.7° vs. 6.7°, p = 0.025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that PhA (odds ratio: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.04–0.68; p = 0.012) was an independent predictor of high CCI. A low preoperative PhA was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications following PD. Conclusions Preoperative PhA may serve as a valuable predictive indicator of postoperative complications after PD, enabling the identification of patients who could benefit from preoperative prehabilitation, including nutritional support.

Background: s/Aims: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for periampullary tumors, but it is technically challenging. Evidence directly comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic, and hybrid approaches is limited. This study conducts a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open PD (OPD), laparoscopic PD (LPD), robotic PD (RPD), and hybrid PD. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1994 and August 2024.We included randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies that evaluated at least two PD approaches. Perioperative outcomes were the primary endpoints, while oncologic safety served as a secondary endpoint. A random-effects NMA was performed, establishing treatment hierarchies through ranking probabilities (PROSPERO ID: CRD420250365864). Results: A total of 78 studies were included (5 randomized and 73 retrospective). RPD was associated with lower blood loss compared to OPD (mean difference [MD], –163.85 mL) and LPD (MD, –84.14 mL). Hospital stays were also shorter for RPD compared to OPD (MD, –2.50 days) and LPD (MD, –1.88 days). In contrast, OPD was the most time-efficient approach compared to LPD (MD, –77.61 minutes) and RPD (MD, –73.30 minutes). Mortality rates, severe complications, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rates, and reoperation rates were comparable across all surgical approaches. In terms of oncologic safety, lymph node yield and R0 resection rates were similar for all modalities. Conclusions While OPD is the most time-efficient approach, RPD provides significant advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss and shortening hospital stays compared to both LPD and OPD.

Purpose: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard minimally invasive treatment for selected patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). This study presents the first nationwide survey of patients with EGC treated with ESD in 2023, conducted by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from participating referral centers across Korea using a standardized case report form covering patient characteristics, tumor features, procedural details, histopathological findings, and clinical outcomes.Descriptive and comparative analyses were conducted to summarize nationwide ESD practice patterns and outcomes. Results: Data from 5,460 ESD cases from 5,250 patients across 27 institutions were analyzed. The mean age was 67.4 years, with 74.1% males. Multiple synchronous lesions were identified in 3.7%. Most lesions were located in the lower third of the stomach (64.0%), and differentiated-type adenocarcinomas accounted for 87.8%. The en bloc and complete resection rates were 99.2% and 91.4%, respectively. Curative resection was achieved in 80.5%, whereas local non-curative resection (L-NCR) and surgical non-curative resection (S-NCR) were identified in 2.8% and 16.7%, respectively. Additional surgery was performed more frequently in patients with S-NCR than in those with L-NCR (59.3% vs. 24.7%). The bleeding and perforation rates were 3.6% and 0.9%, respectively, and were mostly managed conservatively or endoscopically. The median length of hospitalization was 4.0 days. Conclusions This first nationwide survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current practice of EGC treatment using ESD in Korea, demonstrating high technical success and safety, and establishing a baseline dataset for future longitudinal research.

Background/Aims: Patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) commonly experience gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. We aim to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy data for DA-9701, a prokinetic agent targeting 5-hy-droxytryptamine 1A, 5-hydroxytryptamine 4, and dopamine D 2 receptors, in patients with POTS. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center crossover trial, patients with POTS were given either 30 mg of DA-9701 or a placebo 3 times daily for eight weeks in a 1:1 ratio. After a 4-week washout, patients received the alternate treatment for another 8 weeks. The primary endpoint focused on assessing the change in GI symptoms (total Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Korean version [NDI-K] symptom score) from baseline over the 8 week-treatment period. Endpoints were assessed in all enrolled and randomized patients (intention-to-treat), and in those who completed the trial (per-protocol analysis). Results: Between January 2022 and August 2023, 24 patients were randomized (n = 12 per group), with 3 discontinuing after randomization. DA-9701 did not significantly improve primary endpoints for total NDI-K symptom scores in either the intention-to-treat (least-squares means, –13.9 vs. –9.5, P = 0.326) or per-protocol analyses (–17.2 vs –12.0, P = 0.242).Notably, a trend toward improvement in specific GI symptoms, such as upper abdominal pain, was observed in both intention-to-treat (–0.6 vs 0.7; P = 0.066) and per-protocol analyses (–0.9 vs 0.6; P = 0.045). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion DA-9701 did not improve GI symptoms in this crossover trial; however, its potential effect on specific GI symptoms merits further investigation.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Since the publication of the 2020 Seoul Consensus on GERD, significant new evidence has emerged, particularly regarding acid-suppressive therapies and diagnostic approaches. This 2025 focused update aims to refine GERD management strategies by incorporating the latest evidence on acid suppressive therapies and regional considerations in Asian populations. This study builds on the 2020 Seoul Consensus by integrating systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses to offer updated recommendations for the definition and medical treatment of GERD. These guidelines incorporate recent advances in acid-suppressive therapies, particularly potassium-competitive acid blockers, and adopt updated diagnostic frameworks in accordance with the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Key clinical questions were identified and structured using the following format: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome. The resulting recommendations address the initial treatment, long-term maintenance strategies, and role of personalized therapy based on disease severity, such as the grade of reflux esophagitis. Six key statements are presented: updated definition and classification of GERD (Statement 1); initial and long-term treatment strategies tailored to GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease, mild erosive esophagitis, and severe erosive esophagitis (Statements 2-5); and dose optimization strategies for long-term safety (Statement 6). These guidelines aim to support gastroenterologists and general healthcare providers in making individualized evidence-based decisions for GERD management.

This review summarizes the establishment of the 2025 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs), the third national standard for nutrient reference values in Korea. The 2025KDRIs build on lessons from revisions in 2010, 2015, and 2020, and chart a path forward by addressing 4 priorities: upgrading the scientific evidence base through systematic evaluation, strengthening intake monitoring using national survey data, advancing international harmonization, and responding to changes in the nutrition and health environment, including those associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The scientific basis of the KDRIs was advanced by systematically evaluating the findings across exposure indicators, health assessment indicators, and the health outcomes, and reorganizing the indicators to estimate the nutrient requirements. Adequate Intake was set using explicit criteria when an Estimated Average Requirement could not be derived, data gaps, uncertain outcomes, and limited representativeness were documented. Key inputs, including coefficients of variation and uncertainty factors, as well as life stage estimation procedures, were re-evaluated in alignment with current evidence and international standards. The 2025 KDRIs incorporate intake evidence from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to inform policy and practice and support intake monitoring. For international harmonization, the NUQUEST-based literature framework was updated, and recent DRIs from other countries were compared. The shifts in anthropometric characteristics and dietary intake patterns observed during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered to reflect a changing context. The review identified remaining challenges for future revisions, including validating Koreanspecific indicators, developing evidence for infants and older adults, stronger translation of reference values into policy and practice, prioritizing of nutrients for future review within the 5-year revision cycle. Together, these advances will position the 2025 KDRIs as a science-based national reference integrating policy, practice, and evidence to support implementation aimed at improving nutritional status and healthy life expectancy in Korea.

Purpose: This study examined the awareness and knowledge levels regarding food additives among single-person adult households. Methods: An online survey was conducted with 715 single-person households aged between 19 and 64 years, residing in urban areas across 17 metropolitan cities and provinces nationwide. The questionnaire included items on the demographic characteristics, nutrition quotient, awareness of food additives and sources of information, trust in information sources, and knowledge related to food additives. Awareness and knowledge of food additives were analyzed according to the participants’ gender, age group, nutrition quotient grade, and reported awareness of food additives. Results: The proportion of respondents who reported an awareness of food additives was 53.0%, with significantly higher awareness among women and those classified in the medium or high nutrition quotient categories. Participants who were aware of food additives obtained information primarily from the internet, television, or radio. By contrast, those who were unaware attributed this to insufficient promotion and information, or to difficulty understanding the content related to food additives. The information provided by physicians, pharmacists, and professional literature was considered trustworthy, while trust in information disseminated by government agencies was notably low (< 20%). The perceived health risk score of food additives was 3.32, and significantly higher scores were observed among the subjects aged 50–64 years and those with medium or high nutrition quotient grades. The knowledge levels regarding food additives were significantly greater among older subjects, those with medium or high nutrition quotient grades, and those who reported awareness of food additives. Conclusion This study provides baseline data for developing food additive education tailored to single-person adult households, supporting educational media, program design, and promotional strategies, and extending its relevance from academic research to practical contributions in public health and consumer awareness.