A 55-year-old male with hemophilia A came to the outpatient clinic with chest pain for several days after overdose injection of coagulation factor. He was a heavy smoker and a chronic alcoholic. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed no specific change. A coronary computed tomography showed moderate stenosis with soft plaque at the distal segment of right coronary artery. His pain was improved with antianginal and reflux medications. Twenty days later, he ran to the emergency room complaining of squeezing chest pain. ECG showed mild ST segment elevation in inferior territories. Invasive coronary angiography via right radial artery revealed severe thrombotic occlusion at the same lesion. A bare metal stent was deployed and dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel had been maintained for 6 months under the conventional hemophilia management. The patient did not develop any coronary events just with single clopidogrel therapy for 5 years until he passed away from pancreatic cancer. Our case implicates that the invasive coronary intervention and post-procedural management could be safely performed with conventional standards of care while maintaining the usual dose of coagulation factors in a hemophilia patient with acute coronary syndrome.

A 55-year-old male with hemophilia A came to the outpatient clinic with chest pain for several days after overdose injection of coagulation factor. He was a heavy smoker and a chronic alcoholic. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed no specific change. A coronary computed tomography showed moderate stenosis with soft plaque at the distal segment of right coronary artery. His pain was improved with antianginal and reflux medications. Twenty days later, he ran to the emergency room complaining of squeezing chest pain. ECG showed mild ST segment elevation in inferior territories. Invasive coronary angiography via right radial artery revealed severe thrombotic occlusion at the same lesion. A bare metal stent was deployed and dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel had been maintained for 6 months under the conventional hemophilia management. The patient did not develop any coronary events just with single clopidogrel therapy for 5 years until he passed away from pancreatic cancer. Our case implicates that the invasive coronary intervention and post-procedural management could be safely performed with conventional standards of care while maintaining the usual dose of coagulation factors in a hemophilia patient with acute coronary syndrome.

A 55-year-old male with hemophilia A came to the outpatient clinic with chest pain for several days after overdose injection of coagulation factor. He was a heavy smoker and a chronic alcoholic. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed no specific change. A coronary computed tomography showed moderate stenosis with soft plaque at the distal segment of right coronary artery. His pain was improved with antianginal and reflux medications. Twenty days later, he ran to the emergency room complaining of squeezing chest pain. ECG showed mild ST segment elevation in inferior territories. Invasive coronary angiography via right radial artery revealed severe thrombotic occlusion at the same lesion. A bare metal stent was deployed and dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel had been maintained for 6 months under the conventional hemophilia management. The patient did not develop any coronary events just with single clopidogrel therapy for 5 years until he passed away from pancreatic cancer. Our case implicates that the invasive coronary intervention and post-procedural management could be safely performed with conventional standards of care while maintaining the usual dose of coagulation factors in a hemophilia patient with acute coronary syndrome.

A 55-year-old male with hemophilia A came to the outpatient clinic with chest pain for several days after overdose injection of coagulation factor. He was a heavy smoker and a chronic alcoholic. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed no specific change. A coronary computed tomography showed moderate stenosis with soft plaque at the distal segment of right coronary artery. His pain was improved with antianginal and reflux medications. Twenty days later, he ran to the emergency room complaining of squeezing chest pain. ECG showed mild ST segment elevation in inferior territories. Invasive coronary angiography via right radial artery revealed severe thrombotic occlusion at the same lesion. A bare metal stent was deployed and dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel had been maintained for 6 months under the conventional hemophilia management. The patient did not develop any coronary events just with single clopidogrel therapy for 5 years until he passed away from pancreatic cancer. Our case implicates that the invasive coronary intervention and post-procedural management could be safely performed with conventional standards of care while maintaining the usual dose of coagulation factors in a hemophilia patient with acute coronary syndrome.

A 55-year-old male with hemophilia A came to the outpatient clinic with chest pain for several days after overdose injection of coagulation factor. He was a heavy smoker and a chronic alcoholic. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed no specific change. A coronary computed tomography showed moderate stenosis with soft plaque at the distal segment of right coronary artery. His pain was improved with antianginal and reflux medications. Twenty days later, he ran to the emergency room complaining of squeezing chest pain. ECG showed mild ST segment elevation in inferior territories. Invasive coronary angiography via right radial artery revealed severe thrombotic occlusion at the same lesion. A bare metal stent was deployed and dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel had been maintained for 6 months under the conventional hemophilia management. The patient did not develop any coronary events just with single clopidogrel therapy for 5 years until he passed away from pancreatic cancer. Our case implicates that the invasive coronary intervention and post-procedural management could be safely performed with conventional standards of care while maintaining the usual dose of coagulation factors in a hemophilia patient with acute coronary syndrome.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore defecation functions related quality of life (QoL) according to the location of cancer in colorectal cancer survivors. Methods: A total of 120 colorectal cancer survivors (67 colon vs. 53 rectum, mean age: 55.3±10.3 years, 46.7% male) who completed treatment were recruited from a tertiary hospital. QoL and defecation function related QoL were surveyed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ- colorectal cancer specific core (CR29) questionnaire. Physical activity (PA) levels of participants were surveyed using a global PA questionnaire. Results: There was no statistical difference in general QoL according to the location of cancer, but significant differences were observed in defecation function related QoL. When cancer location is closer to the anus, survivors experience more defecation dysfunction, negatively associated with QoL (Hemicolectomy: 67.71±14.07, anterior resection: 92.22±15.18, lower anterior resection: 151.85±17.20, and ultra-low anterior resection: 263.73±42.69). Conclusion When location of cancer is closer to the anus, colorectal survivors experience significantly more defecation dysfunction and poorer QoL. Strategies to reduce defecation dysfunction according to the location of cancer among colorectal cancer patients should be developed.

Background: We aimed to investigate the comparative risk of fracture among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, patients with AF who received a prescrip‑ tion for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin between 2013 and 2016 were included. Risk of major fractures (osteoporotic hip, vertebral, or pelvic fractures) were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: There were 70,481 patients identified (41.3% women; mean [SD] age 70.5 [11.3] years); 16,992 apixaban, 22,514 dabigatran, 27,998 rivaroxaban, and 29,390 warfarin users. During a median follow-up of 390 days, 2412 major fractures occurred with weighted incidences per 100 patient-years of 2.56 for apixaban, 2.39 for dabigatran, 2.78 for rivaroxaban, and 3.43 for warfarin. NOAC use was associated with a lower risk for fracture than warfarin use: HR 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.86) for apixaban, HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.60–0.78) for dabigatran, and HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.70–0.90) for rivaroxaban. In head-to-head comparisons between NOACs, there was no significant difference between apixaban and dabigatran. Rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk for fracture than dabigatran (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.31). Conclusion In patients with AF, NOAC use may result in a lower risk for osteoporotic fracture compared with warfa‑ rin use. Fracture risk does not seem to be altered by the choice of NOAC type, except for rivaroxaban. These associa‑ tions may help inform benefit–risk assessments when choosing between the different anticoagulant types.

Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) usually affects adults younger than 50 years and frequently leads to femoral head collapse and subsequent arthritis of the hip.It is becoming more prevalent along with increasing use of corticosteroids for the adjuvant therapy of leukemia and other myelogenous diseases as well as management of organ transplantation. This review updated knowledge on the pathogenesis, classification criteria, staging system, and treatment of ONFH.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition in which gastric contents regurgitate into the esophagus or beyond, resulting in either troublesome symptoms or complications. GERD is heterogeneous in terms of varied manifestations, test findings, and treatment responsiveness. GERD diagnosis can be established with symptomatology, pathology, or physiology. Recently the Lyon consensus defined the “proven GERD” with concrete evidence for reflux, including advanced grade erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles classification grades C and or D esophagitis), long-segment Barrett’s mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal esophageal acid exposure time > 6% on 24-hour ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring. However, some Asian researchers have different opinions on whether the same standards should be applied to the Asian population. The prevalence of GERD is increasing in Asia. The present evidence-based guidelines were developed using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. In GERD with typical symptoms, a proton pump inhibitor test can be recommended as a sensitive, cost-effective, and practical test for GERD diagnosis.Based on a meta-analysis of 19 estimated acid-exposure time values in Asians, the reference range upper limit for esophageal acid exposure time was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-3.9%) in the Asian countries. Esophageal manometry and novel impedance measurements, including mucosal impedance and a post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave, are promising in discrimination of GERD among different reflux phenotypes, thus increasing its diagnostic yield. We also propose a long-term strategy of evidence-based GERD treatment with proton pump inhibitors and other drugs.