No abstract available.
Intracranial Aneurysm*

No Abstract Available.
Case-Control Studies*

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of lymphocytic hypophysitis in a 31-year-old woman who presented with gradually progressive bilateral visual loss during the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Ophthalmologic examination revealed best corrected visual acuity of 0.02 OD and counting fingers at 20 cm OS. Pupil examination revealed no relative afferent pupillary defect in either eye and intraocular pressure was normal in both eyes. A visual field test revealed nearly total visual defect sparing superotemporal area OD and total defect OS. An MRI of the head was performed. RESULTS: At the time of transsphenoidal surgery following the patient's delivery, a frozen biopsy of the lesion revealed diffuse lymphocytic infilteration and fibrosis of the pituitary gland consistent with the diagnosis of lymphocytic hypophysitis. Postoperatively the patient was treated for hypopituitarism. At 5 weeks postoperative, her best corrected visual acuity was 1.0 OU, and visual field defects resolved in both eyes. On follow-up by telephone for postoperative 7 months, the patient remained visually asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of lymphocytic hypophysitis may mimic pituitary adenoma, lymphoma, germinoma, and histiocytosis. The diagnosis should be suspected in any pregnant or postpartum patient with an intrasellar or suprasellar mass.
Adult ; Biopsy ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Fibrosis ; Fingers ; Follow-Up Studies ; Germinoma ; Head ; Histiocytosis ; Humans ; Hypopituitarism ; Intraocular Pressure ; Lymphoma ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Pituitary Gland ; Pituitary Neoplasms ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy Trimester, Third ; Pregnancy* ; Pupil ; Pupil Disorders ; Telephone ; Visual Acuity ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields

No abstract available.
Adult ; Humans ; T-Lymphocytes

No abstract available.
Fertilization in Vitro* ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone*

No abstract available.
Leg*

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the incidence of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) and the efficacy of lidocaine injection for prevention. Methods: One hundred seventeen patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids and scheduled to undergo a stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) were randomly divided according to submucosal injection to the rectum: lidocaine group (n = 53, lidocaine injected just before full closure of the stapler) and control group (n = 58). Outcomes included baseline patient characteristics (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and previous VVR history), vital signs during the operation, incidence of VVRs (hypotension, bradycardia, dizziness, diaphoresis, and nausea/vomiting), and postoperative complications (pain, bleeding, and urinary retention). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The number of patients with lower abdominal pain after firing the stapler and incidence of dizziness were lower for the lidocaine group than for the control group (9.4% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.017; 0% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.035, respectively). However, there were no significant between-group differences in incidence of nausea and diaphoresis (0% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.172) and syncope (1.9% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.612). Fewer patients in the lidocaine group complained of postoperative pain (41.5% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.072), and these patients used analgesics less frequently than those in the control group (28.3% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.374). Conclusion Patients who received a submucosal lidocaine injection prior to SH experienced less lower abdominal pain and dizziness compared with those who received standard treatment. A larger, more detailed prospective study is needed for further analysis.

No abstract available.
Humans ; Siblings*

No abstract available.
Leiomyosarcoma* ; Myosarcoma* ; Rhabdomyosarcoma*

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is theoretically a superior choice of minimally-invasive surgery and function-preserving surgery for the treatment of proximal early gastric cancer (EGC) over procedures such as laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), open total gastrectomy (OTG) and open proximal gastrectomy (OPG). However, LPG and OPG are not popular surgical options due to three main concerns: the first, oncological safety; the second, functional benefits; and the third, anastomosis-related late complications (reflux symptoms and anastomotic stricture). Numerous recent studies have concluded that OPG and LPG present similar oncological safety profiles and improved functional benefits when compared with OTG and LTG. While OPG with modified esophagogastrostomy does not provide satisfactory results, OPG with modified esophagojejunostomy showed similar rates of anastomosis-related late complications when compared to OTG. At this stage, no standard reconstruction method post-LPG exists in the clinical setting. We recently showed that LPG with double tract reconstruction (DTR) is a superior choice over LTG for proximal EGC in terms of maintaining body weight and preventing anemia. However, as there is no definitive evidence in favor of LPG with DTR, a randomized clinical trial comparing LPG with DTR to LTG was recommended. This trial, the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-05 (NCT01433861), is expected to assist surgeons in choice of surgical approach and strategy for patients with proximal EGC.
Anemia ; Body Weight ; Gastrectomy* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Penicillin G Benzathine ; Stomach Neoplasms*