Background: As the importance of meniscus in joint function becomes more apparent, there is a growing interest in meniscus repair techniques. Notably, biological augmentation methods have shown promising results for meniscus healing, despite their challenges in practical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate meniscus healing and clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with bone marrow aspirate for horizontal or radial tears. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair with bone marrow aspirate from the iliac crest. A total of 30 patients with horizontal or radial meniscus tears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included, excluding those with insufficient data or concurrent surgeries. Patient demographic characteristics, operative data, and clinical outcomes including pain numeric rating scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, knee x-rays, preoperative MRIs, and postoperative 3-month MRIs were evaluated. Results: Thirty patients (15 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 46.8 ± 15.2 years were followed up for a mean of 25.1 ± 3.4 months. Of these patients, 22 (73%) had horizontal meniscal tears, while 8 (27%) had radial tears. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved over the time from the initial to 2 years after surgery. Meniscus healing was 60% on MRI at 3 months after surgery. There was no correlation between changes in clinical scores and healing rate. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the healing rate or changes in clinical scores according to tear patterns. Retears were observed in 2 patients, who were non-compliant with rehabilitation and were managed conservatively. Conclusions Augmentation with bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest for meniscal repair of horizontal or radial tears yields favorable healing rates in MRI and clinical outcomes, highlighting its potential for addressing challenging meniscal repair.

Background: As the importance of meniscus in joint function becomes more apparent, there is a growing interest in meniscus repair techniques. Notably, biological augmentation methods have shown promising results for meniscus healing, despite their challenges in practical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate meniscus healing and clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with bone marrow aspirate for horizontal or radial tears. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair with bone marrow aspirate from the iliac crest. A total of 30 patients with horizontal or radial meniscus tears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included, excluding those with insufficient data or concurrent surgeries. Patient demographic characteristics, operative data, and clinical outcomes including pain numeric rating scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, knee x-rays, preoperative MRIs, and postoperative 3-month MRIs were evaluated. Results: Thirty patients (15 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 46.8 ± 15.2 years were followed up for a mean of 25.1 ± 3.4 months. Of these patients, 22 (73%) had horizontal meniscal tears, while 8 (27%) had radial tears. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved over the time from the initial to 2 years after surgery. Meniscus healing was 60% on MRI at 3 months after surgery. There was no correlation between changes in clinical scores and healing rate. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the healing rate or changes in clinical scores according to tear patterns. Retears were observed in 2 patients, who were non-compliant with rehabilitation and were managed conservatively. Conclusions Augmentation with bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest for meniscal repair of horizontal or radial tears yields favorable healing rates in MRI and clinical outcomes, highlighting its potential for addressing challenging meniscal repair.

Background: As the importance of meniscus in joint function becomes more apparent, there is a growing interest in meniscus repair techniques. Notably, biological augmentation methods have shown promising results for meniscus healing, despite their challenges in practical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate meniscus healing and clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with bone marrow aspirate for horizontal or radial tears. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair with bone marrow aspirate from the iliac crest. A total of 30 patients with horizontal or radial meniscus tears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included, excluding those with insufficient data or concurrent surgeries. Patient demographic characteristics, operative data, and clinical outcomes including pain numeric rating scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, knee x-rays, preoperative MRIs, and postoperative 3-month MRIs were evaluated. Results: Thirty patients (15 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 46.8 ± 15.2 years were followed up for a mean of 25.1 ± 3.4 months. Of these patients, 22 (73%) had horizontal meniscal tears, while 8 (27%) had radial tears. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved over the time from the initial to 2 years after surgery. Meniscus healing was 60% on MRI at 3 months after surgery. There was no correlation between changes in clinical scores and healing rate. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the healing rate or changes in clinical scores according to tear patterns. Retears were observed in 2 patients, who were non-compliant with rehabilitation and were managed conservatively. Conclusions Augmentation with bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest for meniscal repair of horizontal or radial tears yields favorable healing rates in MRI and clinical outcomes, highlighting its potential for addressing challenging meniscal repair.

Background: As the importance of meniscus in joint function becomes more apparent, there is a growing interest in meniscus repair techniques. Notably, biological augmentation methods have shown promising results for meniscus healing, despite their challenges in practical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate meniscus healing and clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with bone marrow aspirate for horizontal or radial tears. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair with bone marrow aspirate from the iliac crest. A total of 30 patients with horizontal or radial meniscus tears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included, excluding those with insufficient data or concurrent surgeries. Patient demographic characteristics, operative data, and clinical outcomes including pain numeric rating scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, knee x-rays, preoperative MRIs, and postoperative 3-month MRIs were evaluated. Results: Thirty patients (15 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 46.8 ± 15.2 years were followed up for a mean of 25.1 ± 3.4 months. Of these patients, 22 (73%) had horizontal meniscal tears, while 8 (27%) had radial tears. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved over the time from the initial to 2 years after surgery. Meniscus healing was 60% on MRI at 3 months after surgery. There was no correlation between changes in clinical scores and healing rate. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the healing rate or changes in clinical scores according to tear patterns. Retears were observed in 2 patients, who were non-compliant with rehabilitation and were managed conservatively. Conclusions Augmentation with bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest for meniscal repair of horizontal or radial tears yields favorable healing rates in MRI and clinical outcomes, highlighting its potential for addressing challenging meniscal repair.

An irreparable rotator cuff tear refers to a situation where the tear in the rotator cuff is large, and there is significant fatty degeneration and atrophy, making it impossible to suture the torn ends back to the humeral head. Various treatment options, including tendon transfer procedures, can be considered in such cases. Tendon transfer may be chosen for younger and active patients, and the selection should consider the advantages and disadvantages, the characteristics of different tendon transfer techniques and the condition of the rotator cuff.The lack of established standard treatment guidelines highlights the need for, further research and clinical experience. Future studies will be needed to establish the effectiveness and safety of treatments, and efforts should be made to improve treatment methods and ensure appropriate patient selection.