1.Development of a Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea (Suicide CARE Version 2.0) to Prevent Adolescent Suicide: Version for Teachers
Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yeon Jung LEE ; Kyong Ah KIM ; Myungjae BAIK ; Jong-Woo PAIK ; Jinmi SEOL ; Sang Min LEE ; Eun-Jin LEE ; Haewoo LEE ; Meerae LIM ; Jin Yong JUN ; Seon Wan KI ; Hong Jin JEON ; Sun Jung KWON ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):117-117
2.Development of a Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea (Suicide CARE Version 2.0) to Prevent Adolescent Suicide: Version for Teachers
Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yeon Jung LEE ; Kyong Ah KIM ; Myungjae BAIK ; Jong-Woo PAIK ; Jinmi SEOL ; Sang Min LEE ; Eun-Jin LEE ; Haewoo LEE ; Meerae LIM ; Jin Yong JUN ; Seon Wan KI ; Hong Jin JEON ; Sun Jung KWON ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):117-117
3.Development of a Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea (Suicide CARE Version 2.0) to Prevent Adolescent Suicide: Version for Teachers
Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yeon Jung LEE ; Kyong Ah KIM ; Myungjae BAIK ; Jong-Woo PAIK ; Jinmi SEOL ; Sang Min LEE ; Eun-Jin LEE ; Haewoo LEE ; Meerae LIM ; Jin Yong JUN ; Seon Wan KI ; Hong Jin JEON ; Sun Jung KWON ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):117-117
4.Development of a Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea (Suicide CARE Version 2.0) to Prevent Adolescent Suicide: Version for Teachers
Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yeon Jung LEE ; Kyong Ah KIM ; Myungjae BAIK ; Jong-Woo PAIK ; Jinmi SEOL ; Sang Min LEE ; Eun-Jin LEE ; Haewoo LEE ; Meerae LIM ; Jin Yong JUN ; Seon Wan KI ; Hong Jin JEON ; Sun Jung KWON ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):117-117
5.Development of a Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea (Suicide CARE Version 2.0) to Prevent Adolescent Suicide: Version for Teachers
Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yeon Jung LEE ; Kyong Ah KIM ; Myungjae BAIK ; Jong-Woo PAIK ; Jinmi SEOL ; Sang Min LEE ; Eun-Jin LEE ; Haewoo LEE ; Meerae LIM ; Jin Yong JUN ; Seon Wan KI ; Hong Jin JEON ; Sun Jung KWON ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):117-117
6.Standardized Medical Terminology: Awareness and Application Among Members of the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
Shinae YU ; Byung Ryul JEON ; Changseung LIU ; Dokyun KIM ; Hae-Il PARK ; Hyung Doo PARK ; Jeong Hwan SHIN ; Jun Hyung LEE ; Qute CHOI ; Sollip KIM ; Yeo Min YUN ; Eun-jung CHO ;
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2025;45(6):635-637
7.Learning curve analysis for hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of 96 consecutive cases performed by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon
Chang In CHOI ; Kyeong Jun LEE ; Min Joo KIM ; Jae-Kyun PARK ; Da Woon KIM ; Hyo Jin KIM ; Harin RHEE ; Sang Heon SONG ; Eun Young SEONG ; Dae-Hwan KIM ; Tae Yong JEON ; Hyuk Jae JUNG
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2024;107(2):81-90
Purpose:
This study aims to analyze the learning curve of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HLDN) conducted by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed on the perioperative clinical data of 96 consecutive patients who underwent HLDN from May 2013 to March 2023. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) test based on operation time and risk-adjusted CUSUM for postoperative complications. Patients were divided into three groups (novice, development, and competency phases) based on changes in operation time. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared between each group.
Results:
Among the patients, 35 were male, with a mean age of 48.9 ± 11.3 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 . The novice phase (phase 1) included the first 30 cases, with the development phase (phase 2) up to the 65th case. Operation times were significantly different across phases, averaging 263.2 ± 33.4, 211.1 ± 34.4, and 161.1 ± 31.3 minutes for phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). Blood loss decreased gradually across phases (phase 1, 264.7 ± 144.4 mL; phase 2, 239.7 ± 166.3 mL; phase 3, 198.8 ± 103.5 mL), though not statistically significant. BMI impacted operation time only in phase 1. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 13 cases (Clavien-Dindo grade I, 4 cases;grade II, 9 cases), with no significant differences across phases.
Conclusion
HLDN can be safely performed by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon, with approximately 30 cases needed to achieve proficiency.
8.Revolutionizing Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Ultra-High-Sensitive ctDNA Analysis for Detecting Hotspot Mutations with Long-term Stored Plasma
Ji-Young LEE ; Seyeon JEON ; Ha Ra JUN ; Chang Ohk SUNG ; Se Jin JANG ; Chang-Min CHOI ; Sung-Min CHUN
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(2):484-501
Purpose:
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has great potential in clinical oncology. The prognostic and predictive values of cfDNA in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported, with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, and BRAF mutations in tumor-derived cfDNAs acting as biomarkers during the early stages of tumor progression and recurrence. However, extremely low tumor-derived DNA rates hinder cfDNA application. We developed an ultra-high-sensitivity lung version 1 (ULV1) panel targeting BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR hotspot mutations using small amounts of cfDNA, allowing for semi-quantitative analysis with excellent limit-of-detection (0.05%).
Materials and Methods:
Mutation analysis was performed on cfDNAs extracted from the plasma of 104 patients with NSCLC by using the ULV1 panel and targeted next-generation sequencing (CT-ULTRA), followed by comparison analysis of mutation patterns previously screened using matched tumor tissue DNA.
Results:
The ULV1 panel demonstrated robust selective amplification of mutant alleles, enabling the detection of mutations with a high degree of analytical sensitivity (limit-of-detection, 0.025%-0.1%) and specificity (87.9%-100%). Applying ULV1 to NSCLC cfDNA revealed 51.1% (23/45) samples with EGFR mutations, increasing with tumor stage: 8.33% (stage I) to 78.26% (stage IV). Semi-quantitative analysis proved effective for low-mutation-fraction clinical samples. Comparative analysis with PANAMutyper EGFR exhibited substantial concordance (κ=0.84).
Conclusion
Good detection sensitivity (~80%) was observed despite the limited volume (1 mL) and long-term storage (12-50 months) of plasma used and is expected to increase with high cfDNA inputs. Thus, the ULV1 panel is a fast and cost-effective method for early diagnosis, treatment selection, and clinical follow-up of patients with NSCLC.
9.2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association
Jun Sung MOON ; Shinae KANG ; Jong Han CHOI ; Kyung Ae LEE ; Joon Ho MOON ; Suk CHON ; Dae Jung KIM ; Hyun Jin KIM ; Ji A SEO ; Mee Kyoung KIM ; Jeong Hyun LIM ; Yoon Ju SONG ; Ye Seul YANG ; Jae Hyeon KIM ; You-Bin LEE ; Junghyun NOH ; Kyu Yeon HUR ; Jong Suk PARK ; Sang Youl RHEE ; Hae Jin KIM ; Hyun Min KIM ; Jung Hae KO ; Nam Hoon KIM ; Chong Hwa KIM ; Jeeyun AHN ; Tae Jung OH ; Soo-Kyung KIM ; Jaehyun KIM ; Eugene HAN ; Sang-Man JIN ; Jaehyun BAE ; Eonju JEON ; Ji Min KIM ; Seon Mee KANG ; Jung Hwan PARK ; Jae-Seung YUN ; Bong-Soo CHA ; Min Kyong MOON ; Byung-Wan LEE
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(4):546-708
10.Prognostic Roles of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer Treated with Lenvatinib
Chae A KIM ; Mijin KIM ; Meihua JIN ; Hee Kyung KIM ; Min Ji JEON ; Dong Jun LIM ; Bo Hyun KIM ; Ho-Cheol KANG ; Won Bae KIM ; Dong Yeob SHIN ; Won Gu KIM
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2024;39(2):334-343
Background:
Inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), serve as valuable prognostic indicators in various cancers. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study assessed the treatment outcomes of lenvatinib in 71 patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory thyroid cancer, considering the baseline inflammatory biomarkers.
Methods:
This study retrospectively included patients from five tertiary hospitals in Korea whose complete blood counts were available before lenvatinib treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated based on the median value of inflammatory biomarkers.
Results:
No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among patients grouped according to the inflammatory biomarkers, except for older patients with a higher-than-median NLR (≥2) compared to their counterparts with a lower NLR (P= 0.01). Patients with a higher-than-median NLR had significantly shorter PFS (P=0.02) and OS (P=0.017) than those with a lower NLR. In multivariate analysis, a higher-than-median NLR was significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 7.29; P=0.015). However, neither the LMR nor the PLR was associated with PFS. A higher-than-median LMR (≥3.9) was significantly associated with prolonged OS compared to a lower LMR (P=0.036). In contrast, a higher-than-median PLR (≥142.1) was associated with shorter OS compared to a lower PLR (P=0.039).
Conclusion
Baseline inflammatory biomarkers can serve as predictive indicators of PFS and OS in patients with RAI-refractory thyroid cancer treated with lenvatinib.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail