INTRODUCTIONThis study aimed to compare medication adherence and treatment persistence of patients on warfarin versus rivaroxaban in Singapore. A secondary objective was to identify significant covariates influencing adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODSA retrospective cohort study was conducted where data from September 2009 to October 2014 was retrieved from the hospital electronic databases. Prescription records of rivaroxaban patients with 3 months or more of continuous prescription were extracted and compared against those of patients on warfarin. Primary outcome of adherence was determined based on the medication possession ratio (MPR), while treatment persistence was determined by outpatient clinic appointment gaps.

RESULTSA total of 94 rivaroxaban and 137 warfarin users were analysed by complete case analysis. The MPR of warfarin patients was lower than rivaroxaban patients by 10% (95% CI, 6.4% to 13.6%; P <0.0001). Also, there were more warfarin patients who had gaps in treatment persistence compared to those prescribed rivaroxaban (8.0% vs 1.1%; P = 0.03). Significant factors affecting medication adherence were age and duration of anticoagulant use. For every 10-year increase in age, MPR increased by 1.7% (95% CI, 0.7% to 2.8%). Similarly, for every year increase in duration of use, MPR increased by 1.8% (95% CI, 0.6% to 3.0%). Race, gender, concomitant medication and type of residence were not found to be significant covariates in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONPatients on rivaroxaban are likely to be more adherent to their prescribed oral anticoagulant with increasing age and duration of treatment influencing adherence.

Adult ; Age Factors ; Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Databases, Factual ; Factor Xa Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medication Adherence ; statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Embolism ; drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Rivaroxaban ; therapeutic use ; Singapore ; Venous Thrombosis ; drug therapy ; Warfarin ; therapeutic use

INTRODUCTIONWe aimed to report the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair performed at Tan Tock Seng Hospital and compare them with those performed at dedicated hernia centres.

METHODSWe retrospectively analysed the medical records and telephone interviews of 520 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair in 2010.

RESULTSThe majority of the patients were male (498 [95.8%] men vs. 22 [4.2%] women). The mean age was 59.9 ± 15.7 years. Most patients (n = 445, 85.6%) had unilateral hernias (25.8% direct, 64.3% indirect, 9.9% pantaloon). The overall recurrence rate was 3.8%, with a mean time to recurrence of 12.0 ± 8.6 months. Risk factors for recurrence included contaminated wounds (odds ratio [OR] 50.325; p = 0.004), female gender (OR 8.757; p = 0.003) and pantaloon hernias (OR 5.059; p = 0.013). Complication rates were as follows: chronic pain syndrome (1.2%), hypoaesthesia (5.2%), wound dehiscence (0.4%), infection (0.6%), haematoma/seroma (4.8%), urinary retention (1.3%) and intraoperative visceral injury (0.6%). Most procedures were open repairs (67.7%), and laparoscopic repair constituted 32.3% of all the inguinal hernia repairs. Open repairs resulted in longer operating times than laparoscopic repairs (86.6 mins vs. 71.6 mins; p < 0.001), longer hospital stays (2.7 days vs. 0.7 days; p = 0.020) and a higher incidence of post-repair hypoaesthesia (6.8% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.018). However, there were no significant differences in recurrence or other complications between open and laparoscopic repair.

CONCLUSIONA general hospital with strict protocols and teaching methodologies can achieve inguinal hernia repair outcomes comparable to those of dedicated hernia centres.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Hernia, Inguinal ; surgery ; Herniorrhaphy ; methods ; standards ; Hospitals, General ; organization & administration ; Hospitals, Special ; organization & administration ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Records ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult