1.Proximal ligation after the side-to-end anastomosis recovery technique for lymphaticovenous anastomosis
Yushi SUZUKI ; Hisashi SAKUMA ; Jun IHARA ; Yusuke SHIMIZU
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2019;46(4):344-349
BACKGROUND: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis is an important surgical treatment for lymphedema, with lymphaticovenous side-to-end anastomosis (LVSEA) and lymphaticovenous end-to-end anastomosis being the most frequently performed procedures. However, LVSEA can cause lymphatic flow obstruction because of regurgitation and tension in the anastomosis. In this study, we introduce a novel and simple procedure to overcome this problem. METHODS: Thirty-five female patients with lower extremity lymphedema who underwent lymphaticovenous anastomosis at our hospital were included in this study. Eighty-five LVSEA procedures were performed, of which 12 resulted in insufficient venous blood flow. For these 12 anastomoses, the proximal lymphatic vessel underwent clipping after the anastomotic procedure and the venous inflow was monitored. Subsequently, the proximal ligation after side-to-end anastomosis recovery (PLASTER) technique, which involves ligating the proximal side of the lymphatic vessel, was applied. A postoperative evaluation was performed using indocyanine green 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Despite the clipping procedure, three of the 12 anastomoses still showed poor venous inflow. Therefore, it was not possible to apply the PLASTER technique in those cases. Among the nine remaining anastomoses in which the PLASTER technique was applied, three (33%) were patent. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that achieving patent anastomosis is challenging when postoperative venous inflow is poor. We achieved good results by performing proximal ligation after LVSEA. Thus, the PLASTER technique is a particularly useful recovery technique when LVSEA does not result in good run-off.
Edema
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Indocyanine Green
;
Ligation
;
Lower Extremity
;
Lymphatic Diseases
;
Lymphatic Vessels
;
Lymphedema
;
Microsurgery
2.Treatment for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection among Chronic Hepatitis C Patients.
Norihiro FURUSYO ; Ahmed H WALAA ; Kunimitsu EIRAKU ; Kazuhiro TOYODA ; Eiichi OGAWA ; Hiroaki IKEZAKI ; Takeshi IHARA ; Takeo HAYASHI ; Mosaburo KAINUMA ; Masayuki MURATA ; Jun HAYASHI
Gut and Liver 2011;5(4):447-453
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori infection causes gastritis, peptic ulcers and gastric malignancies, and its eradication has been advocated by many groups. We determined the H. pylori carrier status and eradication rates of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: In total, 76 chronically HCV-infected patients were enrolled for comparison with 228 HCV-noninfected, age- and sex-matched controls. H. pylori infection was confirmed by H. pylori antibody and urea breath testing. RESULTS: The H. pylori infection rate was significantly higher for HCV-infected patients (67 of 76, 88.2%) than for HCV-noninfected controls (158 of 228, 69.3%). Endoscopic findings showed that the rates of gastric ulcers and gastritis were significantly higher for the 67 HCV-infected patients with H. pylori infection (34.3% and 77.6%) than for the 158 HCV-noninfected controls with H. pylori infection (15.2% and 57.6%). Treatment to eradicate H. pylori had a significantly higher success rate for HCV-infected patients (61 of 67, 91.0%) than for HCV-noninfected controls (115 of 158, 72.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The markedly high H. pylori eradication rate observed in this study shows that eradication of H. pylori holds promise for the improvement of the long-term health condition of patients with chronic HCV infection.
Gastritis
;
Helicobacter
;
Helicobacter pylori
;
Hepatitis C, Chronic
;
Hepatitis, Chronic
;
Humans
;
Peptic Ulcer
;
Stomach Ulcer
;
Urea
;
Viruses