Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of 90Sr- 90Y β-ray low dose applicator, topical timolol maleate, and their combination in the treatment of superficial infantile hemangioma (IH). Methods:From May 14, 2013 to April 11, 2017, 400 children (126 males, 274 females, age 5.3(3.9, 7.1) months) with superficial IH in Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First People′s Hospital of Foshan were prospectively enrolled. All patients were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups according to the proportion of 1∶1∶1∶1 by the method of random number table: topical timolol maleate (group A, control group), 90Sr- 90Y β-ray low dose applicator (group B), single course applicator combined with timolol (group C), and multi-course applicator combined with timolol (group D). Lesions were followed up to the 104 th week (W104). Cure rate of W104 was considered as primary end point. Efficacy and safety of different treatment were compared. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results:Totally, 438 lesions in 400 cases were included in this prospective study. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics among 4 groups ( χ2 values: 1.709-11.616, H values: 3.681-7.653, all P>0.05). As of W104, 11 lesions (2.51%, 11/438) were lost follow-up, 32 lesions (7.31%, 32/438) were with early withdrawal, 357 lesions (81.51%, 357/438) were cured, 15 lesions (3.42%, 15/438) were with residual, 23 lesions (5.25%, 23/438) were with rebound growth, and no serious adverse events occurred in the 4 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that lesions thickness (<3 mm vs ≥ 3 mm, odd ratio ( OR)=16.689, 95% CI: 7.908-35.223; χ2=54.555, P<0.001) and treatment (considering group A as reference category, OR (95% CI) of group B, C and D were 16.842(6.179-45.901), 4.801(2.167-10.638) and 39.127(10.468-146.243), respectively; χ2=47.663, P<0.001) were independent factors affecting the cure rate of W104. 90Sr- 90Y low-dose fractionation radiotherapy was significantly better than topical timolol maleate ( OR=16.842, 95% CI: 6.179-45.901), and the combination with timolol could significantly reduce the cumulative absorbed dose of radiotherapy (group D vs B: 16(8, 16) vs 16(16, 24) Gy; z=-4.947, P<0.001). Conclusion:90Sr- 90Y low dose applicator therapy is superior to topical timolol maleate for superficial IH, and the combination with timolol could significantly reduce the cumulative absorbed dose of applicator.

Objective:To investigate the value of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA) and pediatric critical illness score (PCIS) in predicting mortality of pediatric sepsis in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) from Southwest China.Methods:This was a prospective multicenter observational study. A total of 447 children with sepsis admitted to 12 PICU in Southwest China from April 2022 to March 2023 were enrolled. Based on the prognosis, the patients were divided into survival group and non-survival group. The physiological parameters of SIRS, pSOFA and PCIS were recorded and scored within 24 h after PICU admission. The general clinical data and some laboratory results were recorded. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare the predictive value of SIRS, pSOFA and PCIS in mortality of pediatric sepsis.Results:Amongst 447 children with sepsis, 260 patients were male and 187 patients were female, aged 2.5 (0.8, 7.0) years, 405 patients were in the survival group and 42 patients were in the non-survival group. 418 patients (93.5%) met the criteria of SIRS, and 440 patients (98.4%) met the criteria of pSOFA≥2. There was no significant difference in the number of items meeting the SIRS criteria between the survival group and the non-survival group (3(2, 4) vs. 3(3, 4) points, Z=1.30, P=0.192). The pSOFA score of the non-survival group was significantly higher than that of the survival group (9(6, 12) vs. 4(3, 7) points, Z=6.56, P<0.001), and the PCIS score was significantly lower than that of the survival group (72(68, 81) vs. 82(76, 88) points, Z=5.90, P<0.001). The predictive value of pSOFA (AUC=0.82) and PCIS (AUC=0.78) for sepsis mortality was significantly higher than that of SIRS (AUC=0.56) ( Z=6.59, 4.23, both P<0.001). There was no significant difference between pSOFA and PCIS ( Z=1.35, P=0.176). Platelet count, procalcitonin, lactic acid, albumin, creatinine, total bilirubin, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio were all able to predict mortality of sepsis to a certain degree (AUC=0.64, 0.68, 0.80, 0.64, 0.68, 0.60, 0.77, 0.75, 0.76, all P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with SIRS, both pSOFA and PCIS had better predictive value in the mortality of pediatric sepsis in PICU.