1.An alternative approach to extruding a vertically impacted lower third molar using an orthodontic miniscrew: A case report with cone-beam CT follow-up.
Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez CORTES ; Juliana NO-CORTES ; Marcelo Gusmao Paraiso CAVALCANTI ; Emiko Saito ARITA
Imaging Science in Dentistry 2014;44(2):171-175
One of the most common oral surgical procedures is the extraction of the lower third molar (LTM). Postoperative complications such as paresthesia due to inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury are commonly observed in cases of horizontal and vertical impaction. The present report discusses a case of a vertically impacted LTM associated with a dentigerous cyst. An intimate contact between the LTM roots and the mandibular canal was observed on a panoramic radiograph and confirmed with cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) cross-sectional cuts. An orthodontic miniscrew was then used to extrude the LTM prior to its surgical removal in order to avoid the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. CBCT imaging follow-up confirmed the success of the LTM orthodontic extrusion.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*
;
Dentigerous Cyst
;
Follow-Up Studies*
;
Mandibular Nerve
;
Molar, Third*
;
Oral Surgical Procedures
;
Orthodontic Extrusion
;
Paresthesia
;
Postoperative Complications
2.Influence of receiver bandwidth on MRI artifacts caused by orthodontic brackets composed of different alloys
Reinaldo ABDALA-JUNIOR ; Juliana NO-CORTES ; Emiko Saito ARITA ; Jerome L. ACKERMAN ; Renan Lúcio BERBEL DA SILVA ; Jun Ho KIM ; Arthur Rodriguez GONZALEZ CORTES
Imaging Science in Dentistry 2021;51(4):413-419
Purpose:
The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the role of bandwidth on the area of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts caused by orthodontic appliances composed of different alloys, using different pulse sequences in 1.5 T and 3.0 T magnetic fields.
Materials and Methods:
Different phantoms containing orthodontic brackets (ceramic, ceramic bracket with a stainless-steel slot, and stainless steel) were immersed in agar gel and imaged in 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scanners. Pairs of gradient-echo (GE), spin-echo (SE), and ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences were used differing in bandwidth only. The area of artifacts from orthodontic devices was automatically estimated from pixel value thresholds within a region of interest (ROI). Mean values for similar pulse sequences differing in bandwidth were compared at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using analysis of variance.
Results:
The comparison of groups revealed a significant inverse association between bandwidth values and artifact areas of the stainless-steel bracket and the self-ligating ceramic bracket with a stainless-steel slot (P<0.05). The areasof artifacts from the ceramic bracket were the smallest, but were not reduced significantly in pulse sequences with higher bandwidth values (P<0.05). Significant differences were also observed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI using SE and UTE, but not using GE 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional pulse sequences.
Conclusion
Higher receiver bandwidth might be indicated to prevent artifacts from orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI using SE and UTE pulse sequences.