1.Development and reliability and validity test of peer support demand scale for patients with malignant tumor
Lushan CHENG ; Qian CHAO ; Qingqing SHEN ; Julian XIONG ; Chen CHEN
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2017;23(9):1260-1263
Objective To develop a peer support demand scale for patients with malignant tumor, and to test its reliability and validity,so as to provide an assessment tool for evaluating demand of peer support in patients with malignant tumor.Methods Guided by peer support theory,with theoretical review and qualitative interview,item pool of the peer support demand scale was preliminarily made. After a two-round expert consultation and preliminary scale investigation,first draft of the items was determined. 300 patients with malignant tumor were surveyed by the first draft of the scale,so that reliability and validity of the scale were tested.Results In the peer support demand scale for patients with malignant tumor,4 factors with 21 items were included,namely demands on peer support understanding,emotion,information and evaluation,The cumulative variance contribution rate was 59.684%. The content validity (S-CVI) was 0.920. Cronbacha′s α coefficient of the internal consistency reliability was 0.815,and the retest reliability was 0.824. Conclusions Content validity and internal consistency reliability are within acceptable range,which makes it basically qualified and can be used for investigation on patients with malignant tumor about their peer support demands.
2.Genomic Shift in Population Dynamics of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli in Human Carriage
Shen YINGBO ; Zhang RONG ; Shao DONGYAN ; Yang LU ; Lu JIAYUE ; Liu CONGCONG ; Wang XUEYANG ; Jiang JUNYAO ; Wang BOXUAN ; Wu CONGMING ; Parkhill JULIAN ; Wang YANG ; R.Walsh TIMOTHY ; F.Gao GEORGE ; Shen ZHANGQI
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2022;(6):1168-1179
Emergence of the colistin resistance gene,mcr-1,has attracted worldwide attention.Despite the prevalence of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli(MCRPEC)strains in human carriage showing a significant decrease between 2016 and 2019,genetic differences in MCRPEC strains remain largely unknown.We therefore conducted a comparative genomic study on MCRPEC strains from fecal samples of healthy human subjects in 2016 and 2019.We identified three major differences in MCRPEC strains between these two time points.First,the insertion sequenceISApll1 was often deleted and the percentage of mcr-1-carrying IncI2 plasmids was increased in MCRPEC strains in 2019.Second,the antibiotic resistance genes(ARGs),aac(3)-Ⅳa and blaCTX-M-1,emerged and coexisted with mcr-1 in 2019.Third,MCRPEC strains in 2019 contained more viru-lence genes,resulting in an increased proportion of extraintestinal pathogenic E.coli(ExPEC)strains(36.1%)in MCRPEC strains in 2019 compared to that in 2016(10.5%),implying that these strains could occupy intestinal ecological niches by competing with other commensal bacteria.Our results suggest that despite the significant reduction in the prevalence of MCRPEC strains in humans from 2016 to 2019,MCRPEC exhibits increased resistance to other clinically important ARGs and contains more virulence genes,which may pose a potential public health threat.
3.Correlation between silent information regulator 1 polymorphisms and intracerebral hemorrhage susceptibility in Han ethnic population of South China
Xiehua XUE ; Qingping SU ; Wei WEI ; Julian SHEN ; Min XIA ; Zhicheng LIN
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine 2017;16(11):1091-1097
Objective To investigate the association of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) polymorphisms with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) susceptibility.Methods From September 1,2013 to May 30,2017,Han ethnic 201 ICH patients and 203 controls from South China were enrolled in this study.Genotyping and sequencing ofSIRT1 polymorphisms (rs7069102,rs2273773 and rs7895833) were performed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP).The correlation of SIRT1 polymorphisms with ICH was analyzed.Results (1) The rs7895833 A allele frequency distribution was significantly higher and the rs7895833 GG+AG gene frequency distribution was significantly lower in the ICH group than those in the control group (P<0.05);the rs7069102 C allele frequency distribution was lower and the GG+CG gene frequency distribution was higher in the ICH group than those in the control group,without significant differences (P>0.05).(2) Logistic regression analysis indicated rs7895833 AA genotype carriers had increased risk for ICH (OR:1.57,95%CI:1.14-2.18,P=0.006).(3) As compared with patients with rs2273773 TT genotype,patients with CC and CT genotypes had significantly higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (P<0.05);there were no associations between rs2273773/rs7069102 and ICH.Conclusion SIRT1 rs7895833 is significantly associated with ICH susceptibility;rs2273773 genotypes affect plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in the Chinese Han ethnic population.
4.Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of osteoporosis among Singaporean women aged 65 years and above at two SingHealth polyclinics.
Dypti LULLA ; Chiang Wen TEO ; XiaoYou SHEN ; Zhi Bing Julian LOI ; Khai Wen QUEK ; Hosanna Liha Anak LIS ; Sheila Anthony KOH ; Eric Tao CHAN ; Sarah Woon Ching LIM ; Lian Leng LOW
Singapore medical journal 2021;62(4):190-194
INTRODUCTION:
Singapore has one of the world's most rapidly ageing populations. Osteoporosis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality from hip fractures in the elderly. This pilot study aims to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practice of osteoporosis among Singaporean women aged ≥ 65 years, and assess barriers to osteoporosis screening.
METHODS:
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 99 English-speaking women aged ≥ 65 years at two SingHealth polyclinics by convenience sampling. The validated Osteoporosis Prevention and Awareness Tool was used to assess their knowledge about osteoporosis prevention and awareness and perceived barriers to osteoporosis screening. Osteoporosis health education was provided, and bone mineral density (BMD) screening was offered to all participants.
RESULTS:
The response rate was 91.6%. The majority of the participants (54.5%) had low knowledge of osteoporosis, and only 12.1% had high knowledge scores. Higher education levels were associated with higher knowledge scores (p = 0.018). Although participants with higher knowledge scores were more willing to undergo osteoporosis screening, these findings did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.067). The top reasons for declining BMD testing were misconceptions that lifestyle management is sufficient to prevent osteoporosis, poor awareness and knowledge of the disease, and the perceived high cost of BMD testing.
CONCLUSION
Interventions should focus on osteoporosis education and, eventually, BMD screening for less-educated patients. Health education should rectify common misconceptions of the disease, increase awareness of osteoporosis and improve screening rates.