Background: Propofol is a short-acting intravenous sedative widely used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. However, pain during propofol injection is a distressing adverse effect. This study was designed to investigate whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) could reduce pain during propofol injection compared to sham TENS. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 80 patients were allocated to two groups: the active TENS group received electrical stimulation via two electrodes on the venous cannulation site, whereas the sham TENS group received no stimulus. After 20 min following TENS, propofol 0.5 mg/kg pain was injected intravenously and pain was evaluated using a four-point score (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Adverse effects associated with TENS were also recorded. Results: The overall incidence of pain during propofol injection was 47.5% in the TENS group and 87.5% in the sham group (P < 0.001). The incidence of moderate pain was significantly lower in the TENS group (7.5%) than in the sham TENS group (42.5%) (P < 0.001). There were no complications associated with TENS. Conclusion Pre-treatment with TENS significantly reduced the incidence and intensity of pain during propofol injection.

Objectives: Intradiscal steroid injection (ISI) use has been proven as a low-risk and rapid treatment for disc degeneration disease (DDD). However, the histological effects of steroids on human discs remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether ISI induces histologic degeneration of the disc. Methods: In this study, a histological analysis was carried out on the nucleus pulposus obtained from 150 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Among these individuals, 59 received ISI before the surgery, while 91 did not. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, the histological classification was performed based on chondrocyte proliferation (C1, C2, and C3) and granular matrix change (M1 and M2). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the main factors influencing chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix change.Additionally, histological differences between the ISI group and the non-ISI group were analyzed. Results: Chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix changes were not significantly different between the ISI and non-ISI groups. The logistic regression analysis indicated that age is the most significant risk factor for both chondrocyte proliferation (P = 0.02) and granular matrix changes (P < 0.01). Conclusions The most crucial factor in disc degeneration is age. ISI does not accelerate the histological degeneration of chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix. Therefore, the ISI could be considered as a histologically safe alternative in patients with DDD.

Objectives: Intradiscal steroid injection (ISI) use has been proven as a low-risk and rapid treatment for disc degeneration disease (DDD). However, the histological effects of steroids on human discs remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether ISI induces histologic degeneration of the disc. Methods: In this study, a histological analysis was carried out on the nucleus pulposus obtained from 150 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Among these individuals, 59 received ISI before the surgery, while 91 did not. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, the histological classification was performed based on chondrocyte proliferation (C1, C2, and C3) and granular matrix change (M1 and M2). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the main factors influencing chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix change.Additionally, histological differences between the ISI group and the non-ISI group were analyzed. Results: Chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix changes were not significantly different between the ISI and non-ISI groups. The logistic regression analysis indicated that age is the most significant risk factor for both chondrocyte proliferation (P = 0.02) and granular matrix changes (P < 0.01). Conclusions The most crucial factor in disc degeneration is age. ISI does not accelerate the histological degeneration of chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix. Therefore, the ISI could be considered as a histologically safe alternative in patients with DDD.

Objectives: Intradiscal steroid injection (ISI) use has been proven as a low-risk and rapid treatment for disc degeneration disease (DDD). However, the histological effects of steroids on human discs remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether ISI induces histologic degeneration of the disc. Methods: In this study, a histological analysis was carried out on the nucleus pulposus obtained from 150 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Among these individuals, 59 received ISI before the surgery, while 91 did not. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, the histological classification was performed based on chondrocyte proliferation (C1, C2, and C3) and granular matrix change (M1 and M2). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the main factors influencing chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix change.Additionally, histological differences between the ISI group and the non-ISI group were analyzed. Results: Chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix changes were not significantly different between the ISI and non-ISI groups. The logistic regression analysis indicated that age is the most significant risk factor for both chondrocyte proliferation (P = 0.02) and granular matrix changes (P < 0.01). Conclusions The most crucial factor in disc degeneration is age. ISI does not accelerate the histological degeneration of chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix. Therefore, the ISI could be considered as a histologically safe alternative in patients with DDD.

Objectives: Intradiscal steroid injection (ISI) use has been proven as a low-risk and rapid treatment for disc degeneration disease (DDD). However, the histological effects of steroids on human discs remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether ISI induces histologic degeneration of the disc. Methods: In this study, a histological analysis was carried out on the nucleus pulposus obtained from 150 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Among these individuals, 59 received ISI before the surgery, while 91 did not. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, the histological classification was performed based on chondrocyte proliferation (C1, C2, and C3) and granular matrix change (M1 and M2). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the main factors influencing chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix change.Additionally, histological differences between the ISI group and the non-ISI group were analyzed. Results: Chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix changes were not significantly different between the ISI and non-ISI groups. The logistic regression analysis indicated that age is the most significant risk factor for both chondrocyte proliferation (P = 0.02) and granular matrix changes (P < 0.01). Conclusions The most crucial factor in disc degeneration is age. ISI does not accelerate the histological degeneration of chondrocyte proliferation and granular matrix. Therefore, the ISI could be considered as a histologically safe alternative in patients with DDD.