1.Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 in female patients with eating disorders
Lian GU ; Jue CHEN ; Yue HUANG ; Qing KANG ; Jiabin HUANG ; Yanling HE ; Zeping XIAO
Chinese Mental Health Journal 2017;31(5):350-355
Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q 6.0) in female patients with eating disorders.Methods:A total of 239 patients with eating disorder and 142 healthy controls who were recruited consented to participate in the study and completed Chinese EDE-Q 6.0.Confirmatory factor analysis was used in patients to compare the original 4-factor model,1-factor model and 3-factor model.The criterion validity was tested with the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI).Mann-Whitney U analysis was used to compare the differences of EDE-Q 6.0 scores on the two samples to test the empirical validity,and ROC analysis was used to determine the cut-off value.The internal consistency of the scale was tested in two samples.Among all participants,89 patients and 31 healthy controls were retested 1 month later.Results:The original 4-factor model fit better than the other two.The EDE-Q 6.0 total score and the EDI total score had a high consistency in the total sample,patients and controls,respectively (ICC =0.88,0.87,0.73).Patients had higher scores on the EDE-Q 6.0 than controls (Ps <0.01).The mean area under the curve (AUC) of EDE-Q 6.0 was 0.91,the optimal cut-off point of EDE-Q 6.0 was total score ≥ 1.27,sensitivity and specificity were 79.4% and 88.2% respectively.The Cronbach α coefficients were 0.95,0.91,and 0.88 for the total sample,patients and controls respectively.The test-retest reliabilities were 0.73 for the total scale,0.58,0.68,0.69 and 0.71 for the 4 factors.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 have good psychometric properties and diagnosis accuracy,and it could be used to assess the severity of clinical symptoms.
2.Interferon-α2b spray inhalation did not shorten virus shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients: a preliminary matched case-control study.
Shao-Rui HAO ; Ren YAN ; Shan-Yan ZHANG ; Jiang-Shan LIAN ; Huan CAI ; Xiao-Li ZHANG ; Lin ZHENG ; Hong-Yu JIA ; Jian-Hua HU ; Guo-Dong YU ; Jue-Qing GU ; Chan-Yuan YE ; Ci-Liang JIN ; Ying-Feng LU ; Jiao-Jiao XIN ; Ji-Fang SHENG ; Yi-Da YANG
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2020;21(8):628-636
BACKGROUND:
Currently, there are no drugs that have been proven to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Because of its broad antiviral activity, interferon (IFN) should be evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially while COVID-19-specific therapies are still under development.
METHODS:
Confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China, from January 19 to February 19, 2020 were enrolled in a retrospective study. The patients were separated into an IFN group and a control group according to whether they received initial IFN-α2b inhalation treatment after admission. Propensity-score matching was used to balance the confounding factors.
RESULTS:
A total of 104 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 68 in the IFN group and 36 in the control group, were enrolled. Less hypertension (27.9% vs. 55.6%, P=0.006), dyspnea (8.8% vs. 25.0%, P=0.025), or diarrhea (4.4% vs. 19.4%, P=0.030) was observed in the IFN group. Lower levels of albumin and C-reactive protein and higher level of sodium were observed in the IFN group. Glucocorticoid dosage was lower in the IFN group (median, 40 vs. 80 mg/d, P=0.025). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the IFN group were ventilated (13.2% vs. 33.3%, P=0.015) and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) (16.2% vs. 44.4%, P=0.002). There were also fewer critical patients in the IFN group (7.4% vs. 25.0%, P=0.017) upon admission. Although complications during admission process were comparable between groups, the discharge rate (85.3% vs. 66.7%, P=0.027) was higher and the hospitalization time (16 vs. 21 d, P=0.015) was shorter in the IFN group. When other confounding factors were not considered, virus shedding time (10 vs. 13 d, P=0.014) was also shorter in the IFN group. However, when the influence of other factors was eliminated using propensity score matching, virus shedding time was not significantly shorter than that of the control group (12 vs. 15 d, P=0.206).
CONCLUSIONS
IFN-α2b spray inhalation did not shorten virus shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients.
Albumins/analysis*
;
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
C-Reactive Protein/analysis*
;
COVID-19
;
Case-Control Studies
;
China
;
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy*
;
Glucocorticoids/pharmacology*
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Interferon alpha-2/administration & dosage*
;
Nasal Sprays
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy*
;
Propensity Score
;
Retrospective Studies
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Sodium/blood*
;
Virus Shedding/drug effects*
;
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
3.Comparison of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with and without Wuhan exposure history in Zhejiang Province, China.
Jiang-Shan LIAN ; Huan CAI ; Shao-Rui HAO ; Xi JIN ; Xiao-Li ZHANG ; Lin ZHENG ; Hong-Yu JIA ; Jian-Hua HU ; Shan-Yan ZHANG ; Guo-Dong YU ; Jue-Qing GU ; Chan-Yuan YE ; Ci-Liang JIN ; Ying-Feng LU ; Ji-Fang SHENG ; Yi-da YANG
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2020;21(5):369-377
BACKGROUND:
A novel coronavirus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), first identified in Wuhan, China, has been rapidly spreading around the world. This study investigates the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Zhejiang Province who did or did not have a history of Wuhan exposure.
METHODS:
We collected data from medical records of confirmed COVID-19 patients in Zhejiang Province from Jan. 17 to Feb. 7, 2020 and analyzed epidemiological, clinical, and treatment data of those with and without recorded recent exposure in Wuhan.
RESULTS:
Patients in the control group were older than those in the exposure group ((48.19±16.13) years vs. (43.47±13.12) years, P<0.001), and more were over 65 years old (15.95% control vs. 5.60% exposure, P<0.001). The rate of clustered onset was also significantly higher in the control group than in the exposure group (31.39% vs. 18.66%, P<0.001). The symptom of a sore throat in patients in the exposure group was significantly higher than that in the control group (17.30% vs. 10.89%, P=0.01); however, headache in the exposure group was significantly lower than that in the control group (6.87% vs. 12.15%, P=0.015). More patients in the exposure group had a significantly lower level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) than those in the control group. There was no significant difference in any degree of COVID-19 including mild, severe, and critical between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
From the perspective of epidemiological and clinical characteristics, there was no significant difference between COVID-19 patients with and without Wuhan exposure history.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aspartate Aminotransferases
;
blood
;
Betacoronavirus
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
China
;
epidemiology
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
epidemiology
;
physiopathology
;
therapy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Infant, Newborn
;
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
;
blood
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
epidemiology
;
physiopathology
;
therapy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Young Adult