OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and oral characteristics of cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates in the oncology and maxillofacial prosthesis departments of the General Hospital of Mexico between 2011 and 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients who received prior treatment with bisphosphonates; an intraoral examination was performed by 2 standardized examiners. RESULTS: The prevalence of bisphosphonate-related necrosis in 75 patients was 2.6%; the most common malignancy was breast cancer (84.0%), followed by prostate cancer (16.0%). Exostosis was present in 9.3% of patients and the mean Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth index was 4.64; 44.0% of the study group had a Community Periodontal Index value between 2 and 2.9 (mean, 0.60). CONCLUSION: A detailed intraoral assessment must be performed before initiating treatment with bisphosphonates to identify risk factors for osteonecrosis.
Breast Neoplasms ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diphosphonates* ; Exostoses ; Hospitals, General* ; Humans ; Jaw* ; Maxillofacial Prosthesis ; Mexico* ; Necrosis ; Osteonecrosis* ; Periodontal Index ; Prevalence* ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Risk Factors ; Tooth

Purpose: Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often present with sleep disturbances. We evaluated the effectiveness of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) in real clinical practice, focusing on a population of complex neuropediatric patients with highly refractory insomnia in Spain. Methods: The patients were aged 2 to 18 years, diagnosed with ASD, had sleep maintenance insomnia and/or early morning awakening insomnia, and were refractory to prior therapy. The starting dose of PedPRM was 2 or 5 mg (increased to 10 mg, if necessary). Evaluation at 6 months consisted of a sleep diary, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S). Results: The median age of the 23 patients was 11.0 years, 56.5% were male, 73.9% had epilepsy, and 78.3% had intellectual disability. One patient discontinued treatment. The mean total sleep time did not change significantly. PedPRM improved sleep latency (median 30.0 to 15.0 minutes; P=0.001) and reduced the number of nocturnal awakenings (median 3.00 to 1.0; P<0.001). PedPRM significantly improved PDSS scores (14.6±4.5 to 10.4±3.5; P<0.001) and SDSC total scores (75.1±12.9 to 61.6±10.9; P<0.001). The CGI-I scale improved in 73.3% of patients; 46.7% of patients were normal, borderline, or mildly ill per CGI-S scale at the end of treatment. Conclusion In real clinical practice, PedPRM significantly improved sleep parameters in patients with ASD who were heavily medicated for comorbidities and were highly refractory to other insomnia treatments.

Purpose: Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often present with sleep disturbances. We evaluated the effectiveness of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) in real clinical practice, focusing on a population of complex neuropediatric patients with highly refractory insomnia in Spain. Methods: The patients were aged 2 to 18 years, diagnosed with ASD, had sleep maintenance insomnia and/or early morning awakening insomnia, and were refractory to prior therapy. The starting dose of PedPRM was 2 or 5 mg (increased to 10 mg, if necessary). Evaluation at 6 months consisted of a sleep diary, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S). Results: The median age of the 23 patients was 11.0 years, 56.5% were male, 73.9% had epilepsy, and 78.3% had intellectual disability. One patient discontinued treatment. The mean total sleep time did not change significantly. PedPRM improved sleep latency (median 30.0 to 15.0 minutes; P=0.001) and reduced the number of nocturnal awakenings (median 3.00 to 1.0; P<0.001). PedPRM significantly improved PDSS scores (14.6±4.5 to 10.4±3.5; P<0.001) and SDSC total scores (75.1±12.9 to 61.6±10.9; P<0.001). The CGI-I scale improved in 73.3% of patients; 46.7% of patients were normal, borderline, or mildly ill per CGI-S scale at the end of treatment. Conclusion In real clinical practice, PedPRM significantly improved sleep parameters in patients with ASD who were heavily medicated for comorbidities and were highly refractory to other insomnia treatments.

Purpose: Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often present with sleep disturbances. We evaluated the effectiveness of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) in real clinical practice, focusing on a population of complex neuropediatric patients with highly refractory insomnia in Spain. Methods: The patients were aged 2 to 18 years, diagnosed with ASD, had sleep maintenance insomnia and/or early morning awakening insomnia, and were refractory to prior therapy. The starting dose of PedPRM was 2 or 5 mg (increased to 10 mg, if necessary). Evaluation at 6 months consisted of a sleep diary, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S). Results: The median age of the 23 patients was 11.0 years, 56.5% were male, 73.9% had epilepsy, and 78.3% had intellectual disability. One patient discontinued treatment. The mean total sleep time did not change significantly. PedPRM improved sleep latency (median 30.0 to 15.0 minutes; P=0.001) and reduced the number of nocturnal awakenings (median 3.00 to 1.0; P<0.001). PedPRM significantly improved PDSS scores (14.6±4.5 to 10.4±3.5; P<0.001) and SDSC total scores (75.1±12.9 to 61.6±10.9; P<0.001). The CGI-I scale improved in 73.3% of patients; 46.7% of patients were normal, borderline, or mildly ill per CGI-S scale at the end of treatment. Conclusion In real clinical practice, PedPRM significantly improved sleep parameters in patients with ASD who were heavily medicated for comorbidities and were highly refractory to other insomnia treatments.

Purpose: Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often present with sleep disturbances. We evaluated the effectiveness of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) in real clinical practice, focusing on a population of complex neuropediatric patients with highly refractory insomnia in Spain. Methods: The patients were aged 2 to 18 years, diagnosed with ASD, had sleep maintenance insomnia and/or early morning awakening insomnia, and were refractory to prior therapy. The starting dose of PedPRM was 2 or 5 mg (increased to 10 mg, if necessary). Evaluation at 6 months consisted of a sleep diary, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S). Results: The median age of the 23 patients was 11.0 years, 56.5% were male, 73.9% had epilepsy, and 78.3% had intellectual disability. One patient discontinued treatment. The mean total sleep time did not change significantly. PedPRM improved sleep latency (median 30.0 to 15.0 minutes; P=0.001) and reduced the number of nocturnal awakenings (median 3.00 to 1.0; P<0.001). PedPRM significantly improved PDSS scores (14.6±4.5 to 10.4±3.5; P<0.001) and SDSC total scores (75.1±12.9 to 61.6±10.9; P<0.001). The CGI-I scale improved in 73.3% of patients; 46.7% of patients were normal, borderline, or mildly ill per CGI-S scale at the end of treatment. Conclusion In real clinical practice, PedPRM significantly improved sleep parameters in patients with ASD who were heavily medicated for comorbidities and were highly refractory to other insomnia treatments.

Purpose: Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often present with sleep disturbances. We evaluated the effectiveness of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) in real clinical practice, focusing on a population of complex neuropediatric patients with highly refractory insomnia in Spain. Methods: The patients were aged 2 to 18 years, diagnosed with ASD, had sleep maintenance insomnia and/or early morning awakening insomnia, and were refractory to prior therapy. The starting dose of PedPRM was 2 or 5 mg (increased to 10 mg, if necessary). Evaluation at 6 months consisted of a sleep diary, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S). Results: The median age of the 23 patients was 11.0 years, 56.5% were male, 73.9% had epilepsy, and 78.3% had intellectual disability. One patient discontinued treatment. The mean total sleep time did not change significantly. PedPRM improved sleep latency (median 30.0 to 15.0 minutes; P=0.001) and reduced the number of nocturnal awakenings (median 3.00 to 1.0; P<0.001). PedPRM significantly improved PDSS scores (14.6±4.5 to 10.4±3.5; P<0.001) and SDSC total scores (75.1±12.9 to 61.6±10.9; P<0.001). The CGI-I scale improved in 73.3% of patients; 46.7% of patients were normal, borderline, or mildly ill per CGI-S scale at the end of treatment. Conclusion In real clinical practice, PedPRM significantly improved sleep parameters in patients with ASD who were heavily medicated for comorbidities and were highly refractory to other insomnia treatments.