BACKGROUND: JES9501 is dehydroevodiamine, the extract of Evodia rutaecarpa, expected to be a new therapeutic for Alzheimer disease. This study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of JES9501 after single or multiple dosing. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose ascending, parallel study was conducted in healthy subjects. A single dose of JES9501 50.100.200.400 or 800 mg and multiple doses of JES9501 100.200 or 400 mg once-daily for 7days was administered. Serial blood and urine samples for PK evaluation were collected. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was measured for PD evaluation in multiple dose group. RESULTS: In the single dose study, means of dose-normalized peak concentration (Cmax) of 100.200.400 and 800 mg dose group are comparable except 50 mg dose group. Means of dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from dosing to the last quantifiable concentration of corresponding dose group were similar. At steady state in the multiple dose study, means of dose-normalized Cmax and AUC for dosing interval of 100.200 and 400 mg dose group decreased as the dose increased, however those were not relevant. There was no significant difference of AChE activity between three dosage groups and placebo group. Adverse events related to study drug were all mild and there were no remarkable findings. CONCLUSION: JES9501 was safe and well-tolerated after single or multiple doses in healthy male subjects. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the PK of optimized dosage form and to prove the drug effect in clinical trials for Alzheimer disease patients.
Acetylcholinesterase ; Administration, Oral* ; Alzheimer Disease ; Area Under Curve ; Dosage Forms ; Evodia ; Humans ; Male ; Pharmacokinetics* ; Plasma

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of daily oral doses of tamsulosin administered to fasted healthy Korean male volunteers for 5 days. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, crossover study, all 44 subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a newly developed generic capsule formulation (test) or a branded capsule formulation (reference) of tamsulosin 0.2 mg, followed by a 10-day washout period and administration of the other formulation. Plasma concentrations of tamsulosin were assessed after administration of five-day multiple doses, using HPLC-MS/MS. Clinical and laboratory adverse events (AE) were assessed. RESULTS: The mean (SD) pharmacokinetic properties with the test and reference formulations were as follows: Css,max, 9.0 (2.9) and 8.4 (2.6) ng/mL, respectively; median (range) tmax, 4 (2-6) and 5 (2-7) hours; AUCtau, 93.7 (31.5) and 88.2 (29.3) ng x h/mL; and t(1/2), 9.5 (2.6) and 10.0 (2.7) hours. The volume of distribution and clearance after oral administration of tamsulosin were 0.5 L/kg, and 0.04 L/h/kg, respectively. The accumulation ratios for 0.2 mg once-daily dosing regimen were 1.2. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the log-transformed AUCtau (1.005-1.131) and Css,max (1.000-1.136) values were within the acceptable range for bioequivalence. No serious AE was reported during the study. Both formulations were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the Css,max and AUCtau values in the fasted subjects were higher than those in the fed from other study, with a shorter tmax values.
Administration, Oral ; Cross-Over Studies ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Male* ; Pharmacokinetics ; Plasma ; Therapeutic Equivalency

BACKGROUND: This clinical study was conducted to compare pharmacokinetics of eperisone and aceclofenac of HCP1104, a new fixed dose combination drug with those in co-administration of eperisone 50 mg and aceclofenac 100 mg. The study used a partial replicated study design to characterize intra-subject variability of eperisone when co-administrated with aceclofenac. METHODS: A partial replicated crossover design was employed in 30 subjects. Each subject received a single dose of co-administration of eperisone 50 mg and aceclofenac 100 mg on two occasions and a single dose of 1 capsule of HCP1104. Blood samples were obtained for 24 hrs after dosing, and plasma was assayed for eperisone and aceclofenac by Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Using an average bioequivalence criterion, the 90 % confidence limits for Ln-transformed Cmax and AUClast for aceclofenac fell wihin the acceptable range of 80 - 125 %. Point estimates of eperisone AUClast and Cmax were 1.0152 and 1.0490, respectively and the 90 % confidence interval for Cmax was 0.8499 - 1.3025. The within-subject coefficient of variation of Cmax for the reference was 50.198 %. Acceptance range for eperisone Cmax based on new bioequivalence guidance for highly variable drugs was extended to 0.6984 - 1.4319. CONCLUSION: The extent of exposure and rate of absorption of both eperisone and aceclofenac with a single dose of HCP1104 capsule were equivalent to those with co-administration of a marketed eperisone 50 mg tablet and a marketed aceclofenac 100 mg tablet under fasting conditions in healthy adult males.
Absorption ; Adult ; Cross-Over Studies* ; Fasting ; Humans ; Male ; Pharmacokinetics* ; Plasma ; Spectrum Analysis ; Therapeutic Equivalency*

BACKGROUND: Levodropropizine is non-opioid agent whose peripheral antitussive action may result from its modulation of sensory neuropeptide levels. Currently, levodropropizine 60 mg is taken three-times daily. A controlled release formulation of levodropropizine (levodropropizine CR) 90 mg was developed, which can be taken twice daily. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic characteristics after multiple oral administrations of levodropropizine CR 90 mg tablets in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, cross-over study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers. Each subject received levodropropizine syrup 60 mg three times daily or levodropropizine CR 90 mg twice daily for 3 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and up to 24 hours on day 4. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted by non-compartmental method. Safety assessments including monitoring adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations and ECGs were performed throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 20 male volunteers completed the study. The maximum steady-state plasma concentration (Css,max) of levodropropizine syrup and levodropropizine CR were 313.28 ng/mL and 285.31 ng/mL and time to reach Css,max (Tmax,ss) were 0.48 hr and 0.88 hr, respectively. The area under the concentration-time curve to the last measured concentration of two groups were 2345.36 hr x ng/mL and 2553.81 hr x ng/mL, respectively. There was no serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Levodropropizine CR 90 mg tablet was safe and well-tolerated when administered twice daily for 3 days. No statistically significant differences were seen in Css,max and AUCss,24hr between the two formulations. This study provided pharmacokinetic evidences that the twice-daily dosing regimen of levodropropizine 90 mg may substitute the conventional 3-times-daily regimen of levodropropizine 60 mg.
Administration, Oral ; Cross-Over Studies ; Electrocardiography ; Humans ; Male* ; Methods ; Neuropeptides ; Pharmacokinetics* ; Physical Examination ; Plasma ; Tablets ; Vital Signs

BACKGROUND: Cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride (CFPN-PI) is an oral ester cephalosporin antibiotic with a broad spectrum. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of CFPN-PI following single oral administration in healthy Korean subjects. METHODS: An open label, dose escalation, parallel group study was conducted in 18 healthy male volunteers. A single dose of CFPN-PI was administered to 6 subjects in each treatment group of 100, 150 and 200 mg. Serial blood and urine samples were collected up to 12 h and 24 h after dosing, respectively. Plasma and urine concentrations of cefcapene were measured by HPLC-UV. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis. For the safety evaluation, adverse event monitoring, clinical laboratory tests and physical examination were performed throughout the study. RESULTS: Median values of time to peak plasma concentration were observed around 1.5 to 2.0 h. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 1.04 +/- 0.22, 1.24 +/- 0.46 and 1.56 +/- 0.43 mg/L (mean +/- SD), and area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUCinf) were 2.94 +/- 0.46, 3.97 +/- 1.28 and 4.70 +/- 1.19 h*mg/L in 100, 150 and 200 mg dose groups, respectively. The differences of dose normalized Cmax and AUCinf among three groups were not statistically significant. The fractions of drug excreted in urine unchanged were 31.5 % - 42.9 %. There were no serious adverse events or clinically significant abnormalities related to CFPN-PI. CONCLUSION: CFPN-PI was well tolerated with single oral administration and showed a linear PK property within 100 - 200 mg in healthy Korean male subjects.
Administration, Oral* ; Humans ; Male ; Pharmacokinetics ; Physical Examination ; Plasma

BACKGROUND: Amlodipine is a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, which has proven to be a useful drug against hypertension or angina. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, crossover study was conducted in twenty healthy male volunteers. Subjects were administered 5 mg of the test or reference formulation. After 2-week washout period, the other formulation was administered. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after drug administration, and plasma amlodipine concentrations were determined by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug safety was assessed using measurement of vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory test, electrocardiograms, and adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: All subjects were completed this study. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUClast were 1.078 (90 % CI, 0.968 - 1.200) and 1.095 (90 % CI, 1.011 - 1.186), respectively. There were no serious adverse events were reported by both formulations. CONCLUSION: This study showed the test and reference formulations had similar pharmacokinetics and safety profiles.
Amlodipine ; Calcium Channels ; Cross-Over Studies ; Electrocardiography ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Male* ; Mass Spectrometry ; Pharmacokinetics ; Physical Examination ; Plasma ; Vital Signs

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rosiglitazone/metformin in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. METHODS: A total of 982 patients were enrolled by 19 physicians from November 2003 to November 2010. Patients treated with rosiglitazone/metformin at least once, were included in safety assessment. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were estimated. The effectiveness of rosiglitazone/metformin was evaluated through change in fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial glucose (2hr PPG), Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). RESULTS: Of the 982 patients, 713 patients with the mean age of 56.4 +/- 11.5 years were included in the safety assessment. A total of 130 AEs were reported from 110 patients (15.4 %). The most frequent AEs were upper respiratory infection (2.4 %), oedema (2.2 %), gastritis (1.3 %), and weight increase (1.1 %). The incidence of unexpected AEs was 5.9 % (42/713, 47 AEs). Three SAEs such as bacterial pneumonia, hyperglycaemia, chest pain were reported in 2 patients. As it is about effectiveness, patients showed statistically significant reductions after treatment of rosiglitazone/metformin in FBG, 2hr PPG, and HbA1c (P<0.001 by paired t-test, for all). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that rosiglitazone/metformin is well tolerated and effective in Korean patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes.
Blood Glucose ; Chest Pain ; Fasting ; Gastritis ; Glucose ; Hemoglobins ; Humans ; Incidence ; Metformin ; Pneumonia, Bacterial ; Thiazolidinediones

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rosiglitazone/metformin in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. METHODS: A total of 982 patients were enrolled by 19 physicians from November 2003 to November 2010. Patients treated with rosiglitazone/metformin at least once, were included in safety assessment. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were estimated. The effectiveness of rosiglitazone/metformin was evaluated through change in fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial glucose (2hr PPG), Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). RESULTS: Of the 982 patients, 713 patients with the mean age of 56.4 +/- 11.5 years were included in the safety assessment. A total of 130 AEs were reported from 110 patients (15.4 %). The most frequent AEs were upper respiratory infection (2.4 %), oedema (2.2 %), gastritis (1.3 %), and weight increase (1.1 %). The incidence of unexpected AEs was 5.9 % (42/713, 47 AEs). Three SAEs such as bacterial pneumonia, hyperglycaemia, chest pain were reported in 2 patients. As it is about effectiveness, patients showed statistically significant reductions after treatment of rosiglitazone/metformin in FBG, 2hr PPG, and HbA1c (P<0.001 by paired t-test, for all). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that rosiglitazone/metformin is well tolerated and effective in Korean patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes.
Blood Glucose ; Chest Pain ; Fasting ; Gastritis ; Glucose ; Hemoglobins ; Humans ; Incidence ; Metformin ; Pneumonia, Bacterial ; Thiazolidinediones

BACKGROUND: In recent years, clinical trials have considerably increased and relevant education programs to clinical trials have been developed and implemented since 2008 in Korea. To enhance the quality as well as global competitiveness of clinical trial professionals (CTPs), a certification program of the human resource is needed. Accordingly, in Korea the first and the second certification examinations were implemented in February and October 2012, respectively. In this paper, introduction of the certification program of the human resource is described, and results of the certification examinations and questionnaire survey are presented. METHODS: Data including the examination results and questionnaire survey was collected by cooperative officials in Korea National Enterprise for Clinical Trials. Applicants who were selected eligible for examination by the steering committee were asked to complete questionnaires provided with the test papers on the day of the certification examination. RESULTS: In the first certification examination, a total of 221 eligible participants completed the examination. 99.5 % of the participants responded the questionnaire survey. In the second examination, a total of 223 applicants participated. The examination consisted of 50 multiple-choice questions with cut-off score of 70 per cent score.176 & 194 CTPs passed the first & second examinations respectively. CONCLUSION: This paper that described the results of the two certification tests and questionnaire surveys might be helpful in establishment and activation of the certification program in the future. Quality improvement of CTPs and international competitiveness of clinical trial in Korea can be anticipated by the certification program.
Certification ; Cytidine Triphosphate ; Humans ; Korea ; Quality Improvement ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Silanes

BACKGROUND: In recent years, clinical trials have considerably increased and relevant education programs to clinical trials have been developed and implemented since 2008 in Korea. To enhance the quality as well as global competitiveness of clinical trial professionals (CTPs), a certification program of the human resource is needed. Accordingly, in Korea the first and the second certification examinations were implemented in February and October 2012, respectively. In this paper, introduction of the certification program of the human resource is described, and results of the certification examinations and questionnaire survey are presented. METHODS: Data including the examination results and questionnaire survey was collected by cooperative officials in Korea National Enterprise for Clinical Trials. Applicants who were selected eligible for examination by the steering committee were asked to complete questionnaires provided with the test papers on the day of the certification examination. RESULTS: In the first certification examination, a total of 221 eligible participants completed the examination. 99.5 % of the participants responded the questionnaire survey. In the second examination, a total of 223 applicants participated. The examination consisted of 50 multiple-choice questions with cut-off score of 70 per cent score.176 & 194 CTPs passed the first & second examinations respectively. CONCLUSION: This paper that described the results of the two certification tests and questionnaire surveys might be helpful in establishment and activation of the certification program in the future. Quality improvement of CTPs and international competitiveness of clinical trial in Korea can be anticipated by the certification program.
Certification ; Cytidine Triphosphate ; Humans ; Korea ; Quality Improvement ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Silanes