A 34-year-old woman presented with sudden breast enlargement that had occurred within 6 months. She also had an accessory breast mass on the left axilla. Clinical impression was phyllodes tumor. Needle biopsy revealed fibroepithelial tumor, a mixture of fibrous stroma and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. The final pathologic report was hamartoma associated with focal pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia and macromastia. This is the first reported case of bilateral breast hamartoma with hamartoma in ectopic breast tissue. The masses on the right and left breasts weighed 1,980 g and 1,233 g, respectively, while the mass on the left axilla weighed 36 g.
Adult ; Axilla ; Biopsy, Needle ; Breast* ; Female ; Hamartoma* ; Humans ; Hyperplasia* ; Phyllodes Tumor

PURPOSE: In the treatment of breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is useful to reduce breast cancer size before surgical intervention. Patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) to NAC have improved overall survival (OS). However, the relationship between prognosis and partial response is yet unclear. In this study, we evaluated prognostic factors and the tumor response ratio (TRR) method among patients who received NAC. METHODS: Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated to predict OS. The TRR was calculated by dividing pathologic tumor size by clinical tumor size. TRRs were then categorized into four groups, and the survival times for the different TRR groups were compared using statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Clinical N stage (p=0.02), overall stage (p=0.04), pathologic N stage (p=0.03), hormone receptor status (p=0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (p=0.02) were significantly associated with OS. Pathologic overall stage and TRR did not correlate with OS. Patients with a pCR exhibited the best survival rates using the current staging system and the TRR method. CONCLUSION: Clinicopathologic factors can be easily applied to predict OS, and clinicians could use these parameters until an accurate, simple, and highly discriminatory methods is developed to assess breast cancer patients with a partial.

PURPOSE: As 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has previously exhibited antitumor activity and few adverse effects in the treatment of breast cancer, we aimed to specifically assess the benefits of orally administered 5-FU in hormone receptor-negative small breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with pT1aN0 and hormone receptor-negative breast cancer who underwent surgery between 1993 and 2008 at Asan Medical Center. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on adjuvant doxifluridine (Didox; Shin Poong Pharm. Co., Ltd.) administration, and the disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed for each cohort. RESULTS: Both cohorts had similar ages and tumor sizes. The DFS and CSS did not significantly differ between the groups (p=0.399 and p=0.126, respectively). When the cohorts were assessed according to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, doxifluridine significantly improved DFS among patients with T1aN0 and HER2-positive breast cancer (p=0.037). CONCLUSION: Doxifluridine did not yield a significant reduction in DFS events in hormone receptor-negative early breast cancer. However, a clear benefit was observed in hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive T1aN0 breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The effect of delays in surgical treatment on survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer remains uncertain, but it is an issue of importance to both patients and clinicians. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of delayed surgical treatment on survival and tumor progression such as changes in tumor size and lymph node metastasis. METHODS: Among 1,219 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at Asan Medical Center between January 2008 and December 2008, 1,074 patients were finally included in the study following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups based on the interval between diagnosis and surgery: ≤30 days (group 1) and >30 days (group 2). We retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, changes in tumor size and axillary lymph-node status, and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. RESULTS: Between group 1 and group 2, there were no differences in clinical characteristics or in changes in tumor size between findings based on ultrasonography (USG) with biopsy at diagnosis and pathologic results (p=0.134). Furthermore, changes in tumor size and lymph-node status between USG results at Asan Medical Center and pathologic results also showed no differences (p=0.249 and p=0.233, respectively). There were also no significant differences in DFS (p=0.395) or OS (p=0.813). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that short-term delays of ≤2 months between diagnosis and surgery for breast cancer do not negatively affect cancer progression or survival rates.

PURPOSE: We sometimes encounter remnant or regrowth of benign breast tumors diagnosed as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) C4 in follow-up breast ultrasound after previous vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB). We aimed to evaluate the factors that influence remnant or regrowth tumors at post-VACB site or adjacent tissue. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2015, we analyzed 647 cases on follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups; group A was defined as patients without recurrent masses on breast ultrasonography during the follow-up period, and group B was defined as those with recurrent masses diagnosed as more than BI-RADS C4 on ultrasonography. RESULTS: Fibrocystic changes, proliferative disease without atypia, intraductal papilloma, apocrine cell change, atypical ductal hyperplasia, sclerosing adenosis, and radial scars were observed in 89.5% (n=579), 15.9% (n=103), 15.3% (n=99), 5.3% (n=34), 5.7% (n=37), 7.6% (n=49), and 6.3% (n=41) of patients, respectively. During the follow-up period, 85 patients were diagnosed as group B. Group B was significantly associated with proliferative diseases without atypia, sclerosing adenosis, and microcalcifications compared to group A (p=0.008, p=0.007, and p=0.001, respectively). After adjustment for confounding variables, group B was more significantly associated with proliferative breast diseases than group A (hazard ratio [HR], 0.558; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.343–0.907; p=0.018). Furthermore, group B was more significantly associated with intraductal papilloma (HR, 0.571; 95% CI, 0.342–0.953; p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Previously diagnosed proliferative diseases without atypia or microcalcification at first VACB were significantly associated with recurrent breast tumor. Intraductal papilloma was also significantly associated with tumor regrowth.
Biopsy* ; Breast Diseases ; Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Cicatrix ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Information Systems ; Papilloma, Intraductal ; Recurrence ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasonography, Mammary

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of re-excision and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 256 women who had clinical T2 breast cancer and planned to receive, as initial treatment either BCS (n=197) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=59) between January 2009 and December 2012 were included. The data, including age, initial tumor size, mammographic microcalcification, ultrasound multifocality and axillary nodal status, were collected. The pathologic tumor size, p-multifocality, histologic type, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Ki-67, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) were also reviewed. The re-excision and BCS success rates were investigated. Univariate analysis and regression model were used. To reduce the effect of selection bias, propensity score matching-based analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients, 178 patients (90.4%, 178/197) in the non-neoadjuvant group and 56 patients (94.9%, 56/59) in the neoadjuvant group received BCS (p=0.406). In propensity-matched cohorts (n=118), the re-excision rate was similar in the two groups (35.6% in neoadjuvant group vs. 35.6% in non-neoadjuvant group, p=1.000). BCS success rate was slightly higher in neoadjuvant group (94.9%, 56/59) than in non-neoadjuvant group (86.4% [51/59], p=0.205). In logistic regression model, clinicopathologic factors associated with re-excision were pathologic multifocality (odds ratio [OR], 4.56; p=0.0142), high Ki-67 (≥50%) (OR, 0.7; p=0.0243) and DCIS component (OR, 2.67; p=0.0261). CONCLUSION: This study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could increase the success rate of BCS but could not decrease that of re-excision. The re-excision rate is more associated with pathologic finding rather than the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Breast Neoplasms ; Breast* ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating ; Cohort Studies ; Drug Therapy* ; Estrogens ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Propensity Score ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor ; Receptors, Progesterone ; Retrospective Studies ; Selection Bias ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the magnitude of distress after breast cancer diagnosis and to investigate factors associated with distress, as well as to determine the effectiveness of psychological intervention. METHODS: This study was performed retrospectively, reviewing 264 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between November 2011 and May 2014. Distress was measured using the distress thermometer (DT) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) questionnaires before, as well as at 3 and 6 months postsurgery. Psychological intervention was recommended to high risk patients (DT score ≥5 or CES-D score ≥16). RESULTS: In total, 149 patients (56.4%) were classified as high risk in the initial assessment. In the following assessments, the proportion of those in the high risk group was 38.5% and 25.0% at 3 and 6 months postsurgery, respectively. Mastectomy was significantly associated with high levels of distress compared to breast-conserving surgery in the univariate (p=0.048) and multivariate analyses (p=0.014). However, there was no significant relationship between any of the various socioeconomic factors and distress. Distress level was reduced over time in both scales. Of the 149 high risk patients, only 21 received the psychological intervention. Using linear mixed models, the psychological intervention resulted in marginally significant reductions in DT (p=0.051) and CES-D (p=0.077) scores. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients experienced distress upon initial diagnosis, and the determined surgery type was an important factor associated with high distress level. It is important to identify high risk patients and to manage distress during the initial phase.
Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Diagnosis* ; Humans ; Mass Screening* ; Mastectomy ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Seoul ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Thermometers ; Weights and Measures

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the basic clinical characteristics and survival of patients with breast cancer whose disease had been stably maintained for more than 24 months after systemic therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with primary breast cancer who underwent surgery. Among these patients, patients with stage IV disease at diagnosis or those who developed distant metastasis during the follow-up period after surgery were included in this analysis. Patients whose disease remained stable for more than 24 months were classified as the long-term stable disease group. The remaining patients were classified as the control group. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were eligible for this analysis. Patients in the long-term stable disease group showed a lower rate of histologic type III, a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity, and received less adjuvant chemotherapy. In the long-term stable disease group, the most frequent site of metastasis was the lungs, whereas in the control group, it was the bones. Overall survival was significantly better in the long-term stable disease group than in the control group (p<0.001). In univariate analysis, factors affecting the overall survival rate were the duration from diagnosis to metastasis, the absence of lymphatic infiltration, and the presence of hormone receptors. In multivariate analysis, the duration from diagnosis to metastasis and the absence of lymphatic infiltration were significant factors affecting the overall survival rate. CONCLUSION: Disease progression was observed in many patients even after the disease had been stable for more than 24 months after systemic therapy. Although these patients had better outcomes compared with the others, continuous observation and possible additional treatment might be helpful for some patients.
Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Diagnosis ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lung ; Medical Records ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Survivors

Herein, we report five cases of occult breast cancer treated with axillary node dissection only, without breast surgery or whole breast radio-therapy. The patients complained of a large, hard mass in the axillary area, although no breast masses were palpable. Biopsy of the axillary mass was performed in each case, and histological examination showed a metastatic carcinoma. No malignant findings were observed by mammography or ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance imaging and systemic examinations revealed no extramammary primary lesions. All patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection without breast surgery, and were administered adjuvant chemotherapy but not whole breast radiation therapy. The median follow-up period was 56 months (range, 15–241 months). The patients were all alive with no evidence of disease at the end of the follow-up period.
Axilla ; Biopsy ; Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mammography ; Neoplasms, Unknown Primary ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors of upstaging from diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive cancer after surgical excision. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four patients diagnosed with DCIS based on biopsies between January 2009 and December 2014 were evaluated. Patients' clinicopathological variables were assessed to identify predictive factors of invasive carcinoma from final pathology. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four cases of DCIS were included. Of these, 42 were upstaged to invasive carcinoma on the final excision. Preoperative features such as age 40 years or younger at diagnosis, presence of a palpable mass, ultrasonography (USG)-guided core needle biopsy, tumor size ≥20 mm on USG, high grade DCIS, cribriform DCIS, comedo necrosis, presence of intraluminal calcification, estrogen receptor negativity, progesterone receptor negativity and triple-negative subtype were significantly associated with the risk of invasive carcinoma. Multivariate analysis showed that a tumor size ≥20 mm on USG and triple negative subtype were independently associated with upstaging. CONCLUSION: Tumor size ≥20 mm on USG and triple-negative subtype were independently associated with the upstaging of DCIS to invasive cancer.
Biopsy ; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle ; Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Carcinoma, Ductal* ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating* ; Diagnosis ; Estrogens ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Necrosis ; Pathology ; Receptors, Progesterone ; Ultrasonography