2.Gynaecologic robot-assisted cancer and endoscopic surgery (GRACES) in a tertiary referral centre.
Joseph Sy NG ; Yoke Fai FONG ; Pearl Sy TONG ; Eu Leong YONG ; Jeffrey J H LOW
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2011;40(5):208-212
INTRODUCTIONRobotic-assisted gynaecologic surgery is gaining popularity and it offers the advantages of laparoscopic surgery whilst overcoming the limitations of operative dexterity. We describe our experience with the fi rst 40 cases operated under the GRACES (Gynaecologic Robot- Assisted Cancer and Endoscopic Surgery) programme at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
MATERIALS AND METHODSA review was performed for the fi rst 40 women who had undergone robotic surgery, analysing patient characteristics, surgical timings and surgery-related complications. All cases were performed utilising the da Vinci® surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) with 3 arms and 4 ports. Standardised instrumentation and similar cuff closure techniques were used.
RESULTSSeventeen (56%) were for endometrial cancer and the rest, for benign gynaecological disease. The mean age of the patients was 52.3 years. The average docking time was 11 minutes (SD 0.08). The docking and operative times were analysed in tertiles. Data for patients with endometrial cancer and benign cases were analysed separately. There were 3 cases of complications- cuff dehiscence, bleeding from vaginal cuff and tumour recurrence at vaginal vault.
CONCLUSIONOur caseload has enabled us to replicate the learning curve reported by other centres. We advocate the use of a standard instrument set for the fi rst 20 cases. We propose the following sequence for successful introduction of robot-assisted gynaecologic surgery - basic systems training, followed shortly with a clinical case, and progressive development of clinical competence through a proctoring programme.
Adult ; Aged ; Endometrial Neoplasms ; economics ; surgery ; Female ; Genital Diseases, Female ; economics ; surgery ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; economics ; instrumentation ; methods ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Learning ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotics ; economics ; instrumentation ; Singapore ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; economics ; instrumentation ; methods ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome
3.A comparison of retinoblastoma cases in the Philippines
Roland Joseph D. Tan ; Gary John V. Mercado ; Patricia E. Cabrera ; Paulita Pamela P. Astudillo ; Rolando Enrique D. Domingo ; Josept Mari S. Poblete ; Charmaine Grace M. Cabebe ; Adriel Vincent R. Te ; Melissa Anne S. Gonzales ; Jocelyn G. Sy ; Beltran Alexis A. Aclan ; Jayson T. So ; Fatima G. Regala ; Kimberley Amanda K. Comia ; Josemaria M. Castro ; Mara Augustine S. Galang ; Aldous Dominic C. Cabanlas ; Benedicto Juan E. Aguilar ; Gabrielle S. Evangelista ; John Michael Maniwan ; Andrei P. Martin ; Calvin Y. Martinez ; John Alfred A. Lim ; Rena Ivy Bascuna ; Rachel M. Ng ; Kevin B. Agsaoay ; Kris Zana A. Arao ; Ellaine Rose V. Apostol ; Beatriz M. Prieto
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;49(2):106-114
OBJECTIVE
This study compared the demographics, clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of retinoblastoma patients seen at medical institutions in the Philippines between two time periods: 2010 to 2015 and 2016 to 2020.
METHODSThis was a multicenter, analytical, cohort study using review of medical charts and databases of retinoblastoma patients seen in 11 medical institutions from 2010 to 2020.
RESULTSThere were 636 patients (821 eyes) included in this study: 330 patients were seen in 2010 to 2015 while 306 in 2016 to 2020. More cases per annum were seen in the latter timeline. The number of patients with unilateral disease was not significantly different between the two time periods (p=0.51). Age at onset of symptom, age at initial consultation, and delay in consult were also not significantly different between the two time periods (p > 0.05). Patients had significantly different distributions of intraocular grades (p < 0.0001) and systemic staging (p < 0.0001) between the two time periods. Enucleation was the most common surgical treatment performed in both timelines. There was significant difference in the status of patients based on the need for systemic chemotherapy (p < 0.01). There was significant difference in outcome between the two time periods, including the proportions of living and deceased patients.
CONCLUSIONThis study compared the most comprehensive data on retinoblastoma patients in the country. There was no improvement in early health seeking behavior based on similar age at initial consult and delay in consult. Enucleation remained the most common treatment mode as opposed to chemotherapy due to similar percentage of patients with unilateral disease, an indication for enucleation rather than chemotherapy.
Human ; Retinoblastoma ; Philippines ; Epidemiology ; Treatment ; Therapeutics