Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, involving all patients who underwent ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injection therapy at a single institution over 1 year. Patients were evaluated by two interventionists, who then performed standardized ultrasound-guided lumbar facet joint and pararadicular spinal injections. Results: There were 42 patients treated at our Sports Medicine Centre; with 27 patients (64.3%) receiving facet joint injections and 18 patients (42.9%) receiving nerve root injections. The majority (90.5%) of patients experienced an improvement of >30% in pain intensity at 3 months post-injection, using the Numerical Rating Scale pain score (p<0.001); with 40 patients (95.2%) reporting a reduction in Oswestry Disability Index score (p<0.001). No complications were reported. Conclusions Our initial experience confirms the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided lumbar spinal injection for the treatment of axial and radicular pain in an Asian multiethnic cohort.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, involving all patients who underwent ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injection therapy at a single institution over 1 year. Patients were evaluated by two interventionists, who then performed standardized ultrasound-guided lumbar facet joint and pararadicular spinal injections. Results: There were 42 patients treated at our Sports Medicine Centre; with 27 patients (64.3%) receiving facet joint injections and 18 patients (42.9%) receiving nerve root injections. The majority (90.5%) of patients experienced an improvement of >30% in pain intensity at 3 months post-injection, using the Numerical Rating Scale pain score (p<0.001); with 40 patients (95.2%) reporting a reduction in Oswestry Disability Index score (p<0.001). No complications were reported. Conclusions Our initial experience confirms the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided lumbar spinal injection for the treatment of axial and radicular pain in an Asian multiethnic cohort.

INTRODUCTIONSports concussion remains challenging to manage despite changes to policy and practice since the 2012 International Consensus Conference on Concussion in Sport. Emergency physicians (EPs) are usually the first line of medical care for athletes in amateur and youth collision sports. This single-centre cross-sectional study aimed to establish EPs' understanding and management of concussion in Singapore.

METHODSAn anonymised, 17-item online questionnaire was sent to EPs requesting for information on their clinical experience, training, exposure to concussion cases in the emergency department (ED) and assessed knowledge of the condition.

RESULTSOut of 65 EPs, 52 (80%) responded, 25 (48.1%) of whom were medical officers. Over 90% had not received formal training in concussion management, and 73.1% regularly assessed concussion. 40 (76.9%) EPs recognised that loss of consciousness was not essential for diagnosis and only 24 (46.2%) knew the most common symptom. 26 (50.0%) incorrectly reported that they would perform brain imaging. Among those who indicated onward referral, 29 (55.8%) would refer concussed patients to neurosurgery. There were no significant differences between clinical grade or training in concussion and positive responses for definition, imaging modality or most common symptom of concussion.

CONCLUSIONConcussion is a common presentation to EDs in Singapore. However, understanding of the condition, its clinical diagnosis, investigation and onward management is limited. Although EPs reported training in concussion, it is likely to be insufficient. Commencing relevant education programmes for undergraduate and postgraduate medical students may enable progressive acquisition of knowledge and thereby improve patient management in the future.