1.Clinical Trial on the Antianginal Effect of Trapidil.
Joo Hyun SON ; Jong Geol SHIM ; Jeong Hyun KIM ; Heun Kil LIM ; Bang Hun LEE ; Chung Kyun LEE
Korean Circulation Journal 1988;18(2):251-255
Antianginal effect of Trapidil was evaluated in 30 patients (18 male and 12 females) with angina rectoris. The results were follows : 1) Antianginal effect of the drug were good in 18 cases (60%) and fair in 8 cases (37%), and there was no effect in 4 cases(13%). 2) Improvement in ECG changes was observed in 29%. 3) There were no significant change in CBC, RUA, LFT, serum electrolyte and lipid study before and after medication. 4) The adverse effects of trapidil were constipation, gastric cramp and dizziness, respectively one case. But they were not required discontinuing the medicetion. On the basis of these results, Trapidol was evaluated to be promising antianginal drug.
Constipation
;
Dizziness
;
Electrocardiography
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Muscle Cramp
;
Trapidil*
2.A Case of Grouped Premature Sebaceous Hyperplasia.
Won Woo JIN ; Jong Wook PARK ; Jin Geol JUNG ; Ki Woong RO ; Sang Dai SHIM ; Myung Hwa KIM ; Yong Woo CINN
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2007;45(7):732-734
Sebaceous hyperplasia is not a rare disorder and commonly develops on the face over the age of forty. The typical clinical manifestation is 2~3 mm sized, single or multiple, soft, protuberant, yellowish nodules with central umbilication. Histological examination reveals a group of mature sebaceous lobules and central sebaceous ducts. We describe an unusual case of a 28-year old female patient with grouped premature sebaceous hyperplasia. The lesions presented clinically as grouped, yellowish, umbilicated papules on the left cheek, and had developed at 10 years of age.
Adult
;
Cheek
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hyperplasia*
3.Radiation Dose-escalation Trial for Glioblastomas with 3D-conformal Radiotherapy.
Jae Ho CHO ; Chang Geol LEE ; Kyoung Ju KIM ; Jino BAK ; Se Byeoung LEE ; Sam Ju CHO ; Su Jung SHIM ; Dok Hyun YOON ; Hee Jong CHANG ; Tae Gon KIM ; Dong Suk KIM ; Chang Ok SUH
The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 2004;22(4):237-246
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of radiation dose-escalation on the treatment outcome, complications and the other prognostic variables for glioblastoma patients treated with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Jan 1997 and July 2002, a total of 75 patients with histologically proven diagnosis of glioblastoma were analyzed. The patients who had a Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of 60 or higher, and received at least 50 Gy of radiation to the tumor bed were eligible. All the patients were divided into two arms; Arm 1, the high-dose group was enrolled prospectively, and Arm 2, the low-dose group served as a retrospective control. Arm 1 patients received 63~70 Gy (Median 66 Gy, fraction size 1.8~2 Gy) with 3D-conformal radiotherapy, and Arm 2 received 59.4 Gy or less (Median 59.4 Gy, fraction size 1.8 Gy) with 2D-conventional radiotherapy. The Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) was defined by the surgical margin and the residual gross tumor on a contrast enhanced MRI. Surrounding edema was not included in the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) in Arm 1, so as to reduce the risk of late radiation associated complications; whereas as in Arm 2 it was included. The overall survival and progression free survival times were calculated from the date of surgery using the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to progression was measured with serial neurologic examinations and MRI or CT scans after RT completion. Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group neurotoxicity scores. RESULTS: During the relatively short follow up period of 14 months, the median overall survival and progression free survival times were 15+/-1.65 and 11+/-0.95 months, respectively. There was a significantly longer survival time for the Arm 1 patients compared to those in Arm 2 (p=0.028). For Arm 1 patients, the median survival and progression free survival times were 21+/-5.03 and 12+/-1.59 months, respectively, while for Arm 2 patients they were 14+/-0.94 and 10+/-1.63 months, respectively. Especially in terms of the 2-year survival rate, the high-dose group showed a much better survival time than the low-dose group; 44.7% versus 19.2%. Upon univariate analyses, age, performance status, location of tumor, extent of surgery, tumor volume and radiation dose group were significant factors for survival. Multivariate analyses confirmed that the impact of radiation dose on survival was independent of age, performance status, extent of surgery and target volume. During the follow-up period, complications related directly with radiation, such as radionecrosis, has not been identified. CONCLUSION: Using 3D-conformal radiotherapy, which is able to reduce the radiation dose to normal tissues compared to 2D-conventional treatment, up to 70 Gy of radiation could be delivered to the GTV without significant toxicity. As an approach to intensify local treatment, the radiation dose escalation through 3D-CRT can be expected to increase the overall and progression free survival times for patients with glioblastomas.
Arm
;
Diagnosis
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Edema
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glioblastoma*
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neurologic Examination
;
Prospective Studies
;
Radiotherapy*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Survival Rate
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Tumor Burden